Human Error and Commercial Aviation Accidents: An Analysis Using the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System

Author(s):  
Scott Shappell ◽  
Cristy Detwiler ◽  
Kali Holcomb ◽  
Carla Hackworth ◽  
Albert Boquet ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
pp. 73-88 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott Shappell ◽  
Cristy Detwiler ◽  
Kali Holcomb ◽  
Carla Hackworth ◽  
Albert Boquet ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
John Schmidt ◽  
Dylan Schmorrow ◽  
Robert Figlock

Naval Aviation has redoubled its long-standing efforts to eliminate mishaps, especially those linked to human error. The focus was expanded not only to cover aircrew error, but maintainer error as well. To examine maintainer error, the Naval Safety Center's Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS) was adapted to analyze reportable Naval Aviation maintenance related mishaps (MRMs). A total of 470 MRMs for Fiscal Years 90–97 were analyzed. The HFACS Maintenance Extension effectively profiled the nature of maintenance errors and depicted the latent supervisory, working, and maintainer conditions that “set the stage” for subsequent maintainer acts that were the proximate factors leading to a MRM. The profile and general findings held true for both major MRMs and less severe, reportable MRMs.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gui Ye ◽  
Qin Tan ◽  
Xiaoli Gong ◽  
Qingting Xiang ◽  
Yuhe Wang ◽  
...  

Human errors are one of the major contributors of accidents. In order to improve the safety performance, human errors have to be addressed. Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS) has been developed as an analytical framework for the investigation of the role of human errors in aviation accidents. However, the HFACS framework did not reveal the relationships describing the effect among diverse factors at different levels. Similarly, its interior structure was not exposed. As a result, it is difficult to identify critical paths and key factors. Therefore, an improved Human Factors Analysis and Classification System in the construction industry (I-HFACS) was developed in this study. An analytical I-HFACS mechanism was designed to interpret how activities and decisions made by upper management lead to operator errors and subsequent accidents. Critical paths were highlighted. Similarly, key human factors were identified, that is, “regulatory factors,” “organizational process,” “supervisory violations,” “adverse spiritual state,” “skill underutilization,” “skill-based errors,” and “violations.” Findings provided useful references for the construction industry to improve the safety performance.


2015 ◽  
Vol 86 (8) ◽  
pp. 728-735 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tara N. Cohen ◽  
Douglas A. Wiegmann ◽  
Scott A. Shappell

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document