scholarly journals Sensitivity of the comprehensive trail making test to traumatic brain injury in adolescents

2008 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 351-358 ◽  
Author(s):  
C ARMSTRONG ◽  
D ALLEN ◽  
B DONOHUE ◽  
J MAYFIELD
2012 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 556-564 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel N. Allen ◽  
Nicholas S. Thaler ◽  
Erik N. Ringdahl ◽  
Sally J. Barney ◽  
Joan Mayfield

2005 ◽  
Vol 27 (7) ◽  
pp. 897-906 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rael T. Lange ◽  
Grant L. Iverson ◽  
Martin J. Zakrzewski ◽  
Patrick E. Ethel-King ◽  
Michael D. Franzen

2012 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 446-452 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. S. Thaler ◽  
D. N. Allen ◽  
J. S. Hart ◽  
J. R. Boucher ◽  
J. C. McMurray ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 433-447 ◽  
Author(s):  
J PERIANEZ ◽  
M RIOSLAGO ◽  
J RODRIGUEZSANCHEZ ◽  
D ADROVERROIG ◽  
I SANCHEZCUBILLO ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (08) ◽  
pp. 868-877 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Egeto ◽  
Shaylea D. Badovinac ◽  
Michael G. Hutchison ◽  
Tisha J. Ornstein ◽  
Tom A. Schweizer

Abstract Objectives: Guidelines on return-to-driving after traumatic brain injury (TBI) are scarce. Since driving requires the coordination of multiple cognitive, perceptual, and psychomotor functions, neuropsychological testing may offer an estimate of driving ability. To examine this, a meta-analysis of the relationship between neuropsychological testing and driving ability after TBI was performed. Methods: Hedge’s g and 95% confidence intervals were calculated using a random effects model. Analyses were performed on cognitive domains and individual tests. Meta-regressions examined the influence of study design, demographic, and clinical factors on effect sizes. Results: Eleven studies were included in the meta-analysis. Executive functions had the largest effect size (g = 0.60 [0.39–0.80]), followed by verbal memory (g = 0.49 [0.27–0.71]), processing speed/attention (g = 0.48 [0.29–0.67]), and visual memory (g = 0.43 [0.14–0.71]). Of the individual tests, Useful Field of Vision (UFOV) divided attention (g = 1.12 [0.52–1.72]), Trail Making Test B (g = 0.75 [0.42–1.08]), and UFOV selective attention (g = 0.67 [0.22–1.12]) had the largest effects. The effect sizes for Choice Reaction Time test and Trail Making Test A were g = 0.63 (0.09–1.16) and g = 0.58 (0.10–1.06), respectively. Years post injury (β = 0.11 [0.02–0.21] and age (β = 0.05 [0.009–0.09]) emerged as significant predictors of effect sizes (both p < .05). Conclusions: These results provide preliminary evidence of associations between neuropsychological test performance and driving ability after moderate to severe TBI and highlight moderating effects of demographic and clinical factors.


2013 ◽  
Vol 28 (8) ◽  
pp. 798-807 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. S. Thaler ◽  
J. F. Linck ◽  
D. J. Heyanka ◽  
N. J. Pastorek ◽  
B. Miller ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diego Iacono ◽  
Sorana Raiciulescu ◽  
Cara Olsen ◽  
Daniel P. Perl

We aimed to detect the possible accelerating role of previous traumatic brain injury (TBI) exposures on the onset of later cognitive decline assessed across different brain diseases. We analyzed data from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center (NACC), which provide information on history of TBI and longitudinal data on cognitive and non-cognitive domains for each available subject. At the time of this investigation, a total of 609 NACC subjects resulted to have a documented history of TBI. We compared subjects with and without a history of previous TBI (of any type) at the time of their first cognitive decline assessment, and termed them, respectively, TBI+ and TBI– subjects. Three hundred and sixty-one TBI+ subjects (229 male/132 female) and 248 TBI– subjects (156 male/92 female) were available. The analyses included TBI+ and TBI– subjects with a clinical diagnosis of Mild Cognitive Impairment, Alzheimer's disease, Dementia with Lewy bodies, Progressive supranuclear palsy, Corticobasal degeneration, Frontotemporal dementia, Vascular dementia, non-AD Impairment, and Parkinson's disease. The data showed that the mean age of TBI+ subjects was lower than TBI– subjects at the time of their first cognitive decline assessment (71.6 ± 11.2 vs. 74.8 ± 9.5 year; p < 0.001). Moreover, the earlier onset of cognitive decline in TBI+ vs. TBI– subjects was independent of sex, race, attained education, APOE genotype, and importantly, clinical diagnoses. As for specific cognitive aspects, MMSE, Trail Making Test part B and WAIS-R scores did not differ between TBI+ and TBI– subjects, whereas Trail Making Test part A (p = 0.013) and Boston Naming test (p = 0.008) did. In addition, data showed that neuropsychiatric symptoms [based on Neuropsychiatry Inventory (NPI)] were much more frequent in TBI+ vs. TBI– subjects, including AD and non-AD neurodegenerative conditions such as PD. These cross-sectional analyses outcomes from longitudinally-assessed cohorts of TBI+ subjects that is, subjects with TBI exposure before the onset of cognitive decline in the contest of different neurodegenerative disorders and associated pathogenetic mechanisms, are novel, and indicate that a previous TBI exposure may act as a significant “age-lowering” factor on the onset of cognitive decline in either AD and non-AD conditions independently of demographic factors, education, APOE genotype, and current or upcoming clinical conditions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document