Estimating seasonal variations of leaf area index using litterfall collection and optical methods in four mixed evergreen–deciduous forests

2015 ◽  
Vol 209-210 ◽  
pp. 36-48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhili Liu ◽  
Jing M. Chen ◽  
Guangze Jin ◽  
Yujiao Qi
2018 ◽  
Vol 64 (No. 11) ◽  
pp. 455-468
Author(s):  
Jakub Černý ◽  
Jan Krejza ◽  
Radek Pokorný ◽  
Pavel Bednář

Fast and precise leaf area index (LAI) estimation of a forest stand is frequently needed for a wide range of ecological studies. In the presented study, we compared side-by-side two instruments for performing LAI estimation (i.e. LaiPen LP 100 as a “newly developed device” and LAI-2200 PCA as the “world standard”), both based on indirect optical methods for performing LAI estimation in pure Norway spruce (Picea abies (Linnaeus) H. Karsten) stands under different thinning treatments. LAI values estimated by LaiPen LP 100 were approximate 5.8% lower compared to those measured by LAI-2200 PCA when averaging all collected data regardless of the thinning type. Nevertheless, when we considered the differences among LAI values at each measurement point within a regular grid, LaiPen LP 100 overestimated LAI values compared to those from LAI-2200 PCA on average by 1.4%. Therefore, both instruments are comparable. Similar LAI values between thinning from above (A) and thinning from below (B) approaches were indirectly detected by both instruments. The highest values of canopy production index and leaf area efficiency were observed within the stand thinned from above (plot A).


2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wenjuan Zhu ◽  
Wenhua Xiang ◽  
Qiong Pan ◽  
Yelin Zeng ◽  
Shuai Ouyang ◽  
...  

Abstract. Leaf area index (LAI) is an important parameter related to carbon, water and energy exchange between canopy and atmosphere, and is widely applied in the process models to simulate production and hydrological cycle in forest ecosystems. However, fine-scale spatial heterogeneity of LAI and its controlling factors have not been fully understood in Chinese subtropical forests. We used hemispherical photography to measure LAI values in three subtropical forests (i.e. Pinus massoniana – Lithocarpus glaber coniferous and evergreen broadleaved mixed forests, Choerospondias axillaris deciduous broadleaved forests, and L. glaber – Cyclobalanopsis glauca evergreen broadleaved forests) during period from April, 2014 to January, 2015. Spatial heterogeneity of LAI and its controlling factors were analysed by using geostatistics method the generalised additive models (GAMs), respectively. Our results showed that LAI values differed greatly in the three forests and their seasonal variations were consistent with plant phenology. LAI values exhibited strong spatial autocorrelation for three forests measured in January and for the L. glaber – C. glauca forest in April, July and October. Obvious patch distribution pattern of LAI values occurred in three forests during the non-growing period and this pattern gradually dwindled in the growing season. Stand basal area, crown coverage, crown width, proportion of deciduous species on basal area basis and forest types affected the spatial variations in LAI values in January, while species richness, crown coverage, stem number and forest types affected the spatial variations in LAI values in July. Floristic composition, spatial heterogeneity and seasonal variations should be considered for sampling strategy in indirect LAI measurement and application of LAI to simulate functional processes in subtropical forests.


1998 ◽  
Vol 105 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 55-65 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Cutini ◽  
Giorgio Matteucci ◽  
Giuseppe Scarascia Mugnozza

2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (3) ◽  
pp. 810-824 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.C. González-Sanpedro ◽  
T. Le Toan ◽  
J. Moreno ◽  
L. Kergoat ◽  
E. Rubio

Silva Fennica ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sylvie Mussche ◽  
Roeland Samson ◽  
Lieven Nachtergale ◽  
An De Schrijver ◽  
Raoul Lemeur ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 45 (6) ◽  
pp. 721-731 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhili Liu ◽  
Xingchang Wang ◽  
Jing M. Chen ◽  
Chuankuan Wang ◽  
Guangze Jin

Optical methods have been widely used to estimate seasonal changes of the leaf area index (LAI) in forest stands because they are convenient and effective; however, their accuracy in deciduous broadleaf forests has rarely been evaluated. We estimate the seasonal changes in the LAI by combining periodic observations of leaf area variation with litter collection (LAIdir) in deciduous broadleaf forests and use these estimates to evaluate the accuracy of optical LAI measurements made using digital hemispherical photography (DHP). We also propose a method to correct DHP-derived LAI (LAIDHP) values for seasonal changes in major factors that influence the determination of LAI, including the woody to total area ratio (α), the element clumping index (ΩE, using three different methods), and the photographic exposure setting (E). Before these corrections were made, LAIDHP underestimates LAIdir by 14%–55% from 21 May to 1 October but overestimates it by 78% on 12 May and by 226% on 11 October. Although pronounced differences are observed between LAIdir and LAIDHP, they are significantly correlated (R2 = 0.85, RMSE = 0.32, P < 0.001). After considering seasonal changes in α, ΩE, and E, the accuracy of LAIDHP improves markedly, with a mean difference between the corrected LAIDHP and LAIdir of <17% in all periods. The results suggest that the proposed scheme for correcting LAIDHP is useful and effective for estimating seasonal LAI variation in deciduous broadleaf forests.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document