External anal sphincter volume measurements using 3-dimensional endoanal ultrasound

2006 ◽  
Vol 194 (5) ◽  
pp. 1243-1248 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Thomas Gregory ◽  
Sarah Hamilton Boyles ◽  
Kimberly Simmons ◽  
Amy Corcoran ◽  
Amanda L. Clark
2015 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 164-170
Author(s):  
Kumaran Thiruppathy ◽  
Stuart Taylor ◽  
Kean Guan Kuan ◽  
Richard Cohen ◽  
Steve Halligan ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Yi-Jen Chen ◽  
Michelle B. Chen ◽  
Alan J. Liu ◽  
Julian Sanchez ◽  
Peter Tsai ◽  
...  

Background. We evaluated the anatomic location of the external anal sphincter (EAS) to pelvic bony landmarks related to 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DRT) and studied the dosimetric coverage of the EAS in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiation for rectal cancer.Methods. Sixty-four consecutive rectal cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation were included. All patients were treated in a prone position on a bellyboard by 3DRT. The inferior border of the RT fields was at least 3–5 cm inferior to the gross tumorous volume (GTV) or at the inferior border of the obturator foramen (IBOF), whichever was more inferior. The EAS was contoured and dose distributions were determined using dose-volume histograms.Results. In 53 out of 64 cases (82.8%), the EAS was completely inferior to the IBOF. In the remaining 11 cases, the EAS was either overlapping the IBOF (10 cases; 15.6%) or completely superior to the IBOF (1 case; 1.7%). The average mean dose delivered to the EAS was 2795 cGy. Lower mean doses were delivered to the EAS when the center of the EAS was located more distant from the GTV.Conclusions. Meticulous planning to define the inferior border of the RT field is recommended to avoid irradiating the EAS.


2016 ◽  
Vol 53 (4) ◽  
pp. 240-245 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcelo de Melo Andrade COURA ◽  
Silvana Marques SILVA ◽  
Romulo Medeiros de ALMEIDA ◽  
Miles Castedo FORREST ◽  
João Batista SOUSA

ABSTRACT Background Anal sphincter tone is routinely assessed by digital rectal examination in patients with fecal incontinence, although its accuracy in detecting sphincter defects or separating competent from incompetent muscles has not been established. Objective In this setting, we aimed to evaluate the accuracy of digital rectal examination in grading anal defects in order to separate small from extensive cases as depicted on 3D endoanal ultrasound, using a scoring sphincter defect and correlate anal tone to anal pressures. Methods Women with fecal incontinence were divided into two groups: small or extensive defects according to the ultrasound scoring system. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of digital rectal examination in grading global and external sphincter defects were calculated. Anal tone at digital rectal examination was compared to resting and incremental pressures. Results A cohort of 76 consecutive incontinent women were enrolled. The median Wexner score was 9. Sixty-eight showed sphincter defects on 3D endoanal ultrasound. Anal tone at digital rectal examination was considered abnormal in 62 cases. Abnormal digital rectal examination showed a sensitivity of 90%, specificity of 27.78% in distinguishing small from extensive defects of both sphincters. Five out of eight women with no sphincter defects had only abnormal squeeze tone at digital rectal examination. Abnormal squeeze tone at digital rectal examination had a sensitivity of 65.31% in distinguishing small from extensive external anal sphincter defects. Digital rectal examination sensitivity increased linearly from small to extensive external anal sphincter defects (P=0.001). Women with abnormal resting tone had lower resting pressures than women with normal tone at digital rectal examination (P=0.0001). Women with abnormal squeeze tone had lower incremental pressures than women with normal tone at digital rectal examination (P=0.017). Conclusion Digital rectal examination had good sensitivity and poor specificity in discerning small from severe global anal sphincter defects. Moreover, digital rectal examination had fair sensitivity and poor specificity in grading external anal sphincter defects, and its best accuracy was on complete external anal sphincter lesions. Anal resting and squeeze tone were correlated to anal pressures.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document