Barriers to pelvic floor physical therapy utilization for treatment of female urinary incontinence

2011 ◽  
Vol 205 (2) ◽  
pp. 152.e1-152.e9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Blair B. Washington ◽  
Christina A. Raker ◽  
Vivian W. Sung
2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tammy Ho ◽  
H Henry Lai

Stress urinary incontinence is a demoralizing complication of common urologic procedures such as radical prostatectomy. Basic evaluation of postprostatectomy incontinence should include a careful history and physical examination with a focus on assessing the degree of incontinence and amount of bother and to rule out detrusor dysfunction. Evaluation can be supplemented by a voiding diary, pad test, urodynamics, and cystoscopy as indicated. Management options include behavioral modification, pelvic floor physical therapy, external drainage devices, and occlusive penile clamps. Randomized controlled trials have shown that pelvic floor physical therapy improves continence or enhances recovery of continence in the postoperative period but only when initiated before or immediately after catheter removal. Men who have intrinsic sphincter deficiency can be evaluated for injection of urethral bulking agents, including collagen, carbon-coated zirconium oxide beads, calcium hydroxylapatite particles, and heat-vulcanized polydimethylsiloxane. Injectable bulking agents have the advantage of being minimally invasive and are generally considered safe. However, multiple reinjections are often required due to deteriorating efficacy over time and thus should be considered only in patients with mild stress incontinence or in patients who are poor surgical candidates for slings or the artificial urinary sphincter.   This review contains 3 figures and 54 references Key words: conservative management, injectable urethral bulking agents, pelvic floor physical therapy, postprostatectomy urinary incontinence, stress urinary incontinence


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tammy Ho ◽  
H Henry Lai

Stress urinary incontinence is a demoralizing complication of common urologic procedures such as radical prostatectomy. Basic evaluation of postprostatectomy incontinence should include a careful history and physical examination with a focus on assessing the degree of incontinence and amount of bother and to rule out detrusor dysfunction. Evaluation can be supplemented by a voiding diary, pad test, urodynamics, and cystoscopy as indicated. Management options include behavioral modification, pelvic floor physical therapy, external drainage devices, and occlusive penile clamps. Randomized controlled trials have shown that pelvic floor physical therapy improves continence or enhances recovery of continence in the postoperative period but only when initiated before or immediately after catheter removal. Men who have intrinsic sphincter deficiency can be evaluated for injection of urethral bulking agents, including collagen, carbon-coated zirconium oxide beads, calcium hydroxylapatite particles, and heat-vulcanized polydimethylsiloxane. Injectable bulking agents have the advantage of being minimally invasive and are generally considered safe. However, multiple reinjections are often required due to deteriorating efficacy over time and thus should be considered only in patients with mild stress incontinence or in patients who are poor surgical candidates for slings or the artificial urinary sphincter.   This review contains 3 figures and 54 references Key words: conservative management, injectable urethral bulking agents, pelvic floor physical therapy, postprostatectomy urinary incontinence, stress urinary incontinence


2014 ◽  
Vol 20 (6) ◽  
pp. 334-341 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel N. Pauls ◽  
Catrina C. Crisp ◽  
Kathleen Novicki ◽  
Angela N. Fellner ◽  
Steven D. Kleeman

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (6) ◽  
pp. 478-485 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claire Zar-Kessler ◽  
Braden Kuo ◽  
Elizabeth Cole ◽  
Anna Benedix ◽  
Jaime Belkind-Gerson

Objectives: Chronic constipation is a common childhood problem and often caused or worsened by abnormal dynamics of defecation. The aim of this study was to assess the benefit of pelvic floor physical therapy (PFPT), a novel treatment in pediatrics for the treatment of chronic constipation with dyssynergic defecation. Methods: This was a retrospective study of 69 children seen at a pediatric neurogastroenterology program of a large tertiary referral center for chronic constipation and dyssynergic defecation, determined by anorectal manometry and balloon expulsion testing. We compared the clinical outcome of patients who underwent PFPT (n = 49) to control patients (n = 20) whom received only medical treatment (laxatives/stool softeners). Additionally, characteristics of the treatment group were analyzed in relation to therapeutic response. Results: Thirty-seven (76%) of the patients who received physical therapy had improvement in constipation symptoms, compared to 5 (25%) of the patients on conservative treatment (p < 0.01). Additionally, patients who received pelvic physical therapy had fewer hospitalizations for cleanouts (4 vs. 25%, p = 0.01) and ­colonic surgery than those that were treated with medical therapy exclusively (0 vs. 10%, p = 0.03). Among the patients who received physical therapy, those that suffered from anxiety and/or low muscle tone had a higher response rate (100%). There were no adverse effects from the intervention. Conclusion: The new field of pediatric PFPT is a safe and effective intervention for children with dyssynergic defecation causing or contributing to chronic constipation, particularly in children whose comorbidities include anxiety and low ­muscle tone.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document