Colonic Diverticulosis and Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: Is There a Connection?

Background and Objectives: The development and severity of colonic diverticulosis and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) has been associated with several components of metabolic syndrome (MetS). Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate a possible connection between NAFLD, colonic diverticulosis, and MetS. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included patients diagnosed with diverticulosis between January 2017 and December 2019. Data regarding the patient demographics, Diverticular Inflammation and Complication Assessment (DICA) score and category, disease localization, hepatic steatosis, blood pressure, comprehensive metabolic panel, need for colonic surgery, and co-morbidities were collected from medical records. Results: A total of 407 patients with a median age of 68 years (range, 34–89 years) were included (male: 53.81%). The majority was diagnosed with left-sided diverticulosis (n = 367, 90.17%) and an uncomplicated disease course (DICA category 1, n = 347, 85.3%). Concomitant hepatic steatosis was detected in 47.42% (n = 193) of patients. The systolic blood pressure, triglycerides, total cholesterol, C-reactive protein (CRP), and fasting glucose were higher in the NAFLD group (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, and p < 0.001, respectively). A higher prevalence of hypertension (HTA), type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and hypothyroidism was noted in the same group of patients (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, and p = 0.008, respectively). High-density lipoprotein cholesterol was lower in patients with more severe forms of diverticulosis (DICA category 2 and 3), while CRP levels were significantly higher (p = 0.006 and p = 0.015, respectively). HTA and NAFLD were more common in patients with more severe forms of colonic diverticulosis (p = 0.016 and p = 0.025, respectively). Using a multivariate logistic regression, the DICA score, CRP, total cholesterol, HTA, and hypothyroidism were identified as discriminating factors for the presence of hepatic steatosis. Conclusion: Components of metabolic dysregulation were prominent in patients diagnosed with colonic diverticulosis and concomitant hepatic steatosis. HTA, T2DM, and hypothyroidism were more frequently observed in this group. Hepatic steatosis was more commonly detected in more severe forms of colonic diverticulosis.

The usage of antibiotic therapy for septic complications in colorectal surgery

Over the past few decades, surgeons have made many attempts to reduce the incidence of surgical site infections (SSI) after elective colorectal surgery. Routine faecal diversion is no longer practiced in elective colonic surgery and mechanical bowel preparation is on the verge of being eliminated altogether. Intravenous antibiotics have become the standard of care as prophylaxis against SSI for elective colorectal operations. However, the role of antibiotics is still being debated. The aim of the study was to reduce the proportion of antibiotic-resistant strains of pathogens of infectious complications in colorectal surgery by optimizing the use of antimicrobial drugs. Method: We analyzed data of 135 patients who were operated for colorectal cancer in our general surgery department in between 2019 and 2021. Age, gender, body mass index, presence of chronic pulmonary disease, surgery duration, disease location (colon or rectum), and surgeon volume were evaluated for associations with the development of superficial or deep surgical site infection. Results: All parameters were found to be significant for the development surgical site infection except sex. Cut-off values were 63.5 years for age, 167.5 minutes for surgery duration. Conclusion. The introduction of strict monitoring of compliance with the protocols of antibiotic prophylaxis and antibiotic therapy at the level of a separate surgical unit in a multidisciplinary hospital improves conditions for the rational use of antimicrobial drugs.

Study to Determine the Short-Term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Colonic Surgery

Introduction: The article presents early Outcomes in laparoscopic colorectal surgery according to tumour size, duration of surgery, duration of postoperative analgesic requirements, recovery of bowel function, postoperative complications, and mortality. Aim: The aim of the analysis is to describe the short-term outcomes of our patients who endured laparoscopic colonic surgery because of various colon pathologies. Study Design: A Retrospective Case Review cohort study. Methods: The surgical and clinical records of all laparoscopic assisted colon procedures were reviewed and selected for the study held in the Surgical department of Social Security Landhi Hospital Karachi for two years duration from June 2019 to June 2021. All patients underwent surgery under general anaesthesia. Results: During this period, 62 total laparoscopic assisted colon (LAC) procedures were achieved. 41were male and 21 females. 54 patients underwent cancer surgery out of which 51 patient had adenocarcinoma of colon, 2 patient had carcinoids of bowel , and 1 patient had Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Ileocecal tuberculosis was noted in 5 patients and submucosal polyps in one patient. Of these 54 procedures for colonic cancer , 12 were left hemicolectomy, 34 right hemicolectomy, 2 segmental splenic flexure resections, 3 segmental resection with transverse colostomy and 3 sigmoid colectomy The average time of LAC surgery was 140 minutes (range 60 to 250). The average duration of analgesic drugs was 3 days (range 3–6). The median time to the first movement in the bowel was 2.5 days (range 2–4) and the hospital stay was 6 days (range 5–10). Conclusions: Laparoscopically assisted colon procedures are associated with early return of bowel function, less analgesic consumption, short hospital stays, and a lower rate of post operative complication. Laparoscopic colorectal surgery is achievable with optimum operative time and is a logical advantage for good operative outcomes with advanced laparoscopic skills. Keywords: Laparoscopically assisted colon surgery, laparoscopy and Colon cancer.

Gastrointestinal surgery

This chapter discusses the anaesthetic management of gastrointestinal surgery. It begins with a description of management principles for major gastrointestinal (GI) surgery, both open and laparoscopic. Surgical procedures covered include colorectal surgery; laparoscopic surgery (including laparoscopic cholecystectomy and laparoscopic colonic surgery); appendicectomy; inguinal hernia repair, and anal/perianal procedures

A comparison of ultrasound guided bilateral single injection shot Erector Spinae Plane blocks versus wound infiltration for post-operative analgesia in laparoscopic assisted colonic surgery- a prospective randomised study

Background Both wound infiltration (WI) with local anaesthetic and Erector Spinae Plane block (ESPB) have been described for post-operative analgesia after abdominal surgery. This study compared the efficacy of WI versus ESPB for post-operative analgesia after laparoscopic assisted colonic surgery. Methods Seventy-two patients between 18 and 85 years of age undergoing elective surgery were randomised to receive either WI or ESPB. In the WI group a 40 ml bolus of 0.5% Ropivacaine, infiltrated at the ports and minimally invasive wound at subcutaneous and fascia layers. In the ESPB group at T8 level, under ultrasound guidance, a 22-gauge nerve block needle was passed through the Erector Spinae muscle to reach its fascia. A dose up to 40 ml of 0.5% Ropivacaine, divided into two equal volumes, was injected at each side. Both groups had a multimodal analgesic regime, including regular Paracetamol, dexamethasone and patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with Fentanyl. The primary end point was a post-operative pain score utilising a verbal Numerical Rating Score (NRS, 0–10) on rest and coughing in the post anaesthetic care unit (PACU) and in the first 24 h. Secondary outcomes measured were: opioid usage, length of stay and any clinical adverse events. Results There was no significant treatment difference in PACU NRS at rest and coughing (p-values 0. 382 and 0.595respectively). Similarly, there were no significant differences in first 24 h NRS at rest and coughing (p-values 0.285 and 0.431 respectively). There was no significant difference in Fentanyl use in PACU or in the first 24 h (p- values 0.900 and 0.783 respectively). Neither was there a significant difference found in mean total Fentanyl use between ESPB and WI groups (p-value 0.787). Conclusion Our observations found both interventions had an overall similar efficacy. Trial registration The study was registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry (ACTRN: 12619000113156).

Preoperative Localization in Colonic Surgery (PLoCoS Study): a multicentric experience on behalf of the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (SICCR)

The aim of this prospective multicentric study was to compare the accurate colonic lesion localization ratio between CT and colonoscopy in comparison with surgery. All consecutive patients from 1st January to 31st December 2019 with a histologically confirmed diagnosis of dysplastic adenoma or adenocarcinoma with planned elective, curative colonic resection who underwent both colonoscopy and CT scans were included. Each patient underwent conventional colonoscopy and CT to stage the tumour, and the localization results of each procedure were registered. CT and colonoscopic localization were compared with surgical localization, adopted as the reference. Our analysis included 745 patients from 23 centres. After comparing the accuracy of colonoscopy and CT (for visible lesions) in localizing colonic lesions, no significant differences were found between the two preoperative tools (510/661 vs 499/661 correctly localized lesions, p = 0.518). Furthermore, after analysing only the patients who underwent complete colonoscopy and had a visible lesion on CT, no significant difference was observed between conventional colonoscopy and CT (331/427 vs 340/427, p = 0.505). Considering the intraoperative localization results as a reference, a comparison between colonoscopy and CT showed that colonoscopy significantly failed to correctly locate the lesions localized in the descending colon (17/32 vs 26/32, p = 0.031). We did not identify an advantage in using CT to localize colonic tumours. In this setting, colonoscopy should be considered the reference to properly localize lesions; however, to better identify lesions in the descending colon, CT could be considered a valuable tool to improve the accuracy of lesion localization.

EP.TH.282Adherence to ERAS® Society recommendations following elective colonic surgery (2012) in regard to urinary drainage, postoperative nutritional care and intra-abdominal drainage

Aims Evaluating adherence to ERAS® recommendations for post-operative urinary drainage, nutritional care and intra-abdominal drain placement in elective colorectal surgery. Methods Approval was obtained by the audit department of a university teaching hospital. Data was collected prospectively over a seven-week period for nineteen (n = 19) patients. Results were compared against the standard set by the ERAS® Society (2012). Results Right colonic surgery (n = 5): catheter removed on post-operative day (POD) 1 n = 1 (20%), normal diet started on POD 0 or 1 n = 3 (60%), IV fluids discontinued on POD 1 n = 3 (60%) and n = 4 (80%) did not have a drain placed. High anterior resection or left/subtotal colectomy (n = 9): catheter removed on POD 1 n = 3 (33%), normal diet started on POD 0 or 1 n = 4 (44%), IV fluids discontinued on POD 1 n = 3 (33%) and n = 2 (22%) did not have a drain placed. Low rectal surgery (n = 4*, *one patient, n = 1, excluded from all domains except intra-abdominal drainage due to immediate post-op complication): catheter removed on POD 3 n = 4 (100%), normal diet started on POD 0 or 1 n = 2 (50%), IV fluids discontinued on POD 1 n = 1 (25%) and all patients had a drain placed n = 5 (100%). Conclusions Adherence for urinary drainage in low rectal surgery and intra-abdominal drainage for right colonic surgery was satisfactory. Multiple areas of improvement were identified, in order to optimise compliance, and recommendations were generated. The exception may be drains for lower rectal surgery where recent data has recommended selective drain placement.

A Modified Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy Regimen for Ovarian Cancer: Technique and Treatment Outcomes

This study aimed to investigate treatment outcomes concerning three institutional modifications to intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy for patients with ovarian cancer. The medical records of 27 patients treated with IP chemotherapy were retrospectively reviewed. All patients had three IP chemotherapy institutional modifications; modified Gynecologic Oncology Group 172 regimen was used for the chemotherapy regimen. With institutional modifications, 63.0% (17/27) completed all six cycles of IP chemotherapy. Of the 17 and 10 patients with primary and recurrent ovarian cancer, respectively, 55.6% (15/27) underwent left colonic surgery, including low anterior resection. In patients with primary ovarian cancer, the IP chemotherapy completion rate was 76.5% (13/17). In patients with and without left colonic surgery, the IP chemotherapy completion rates were 53.3% (8/15) and 75.0% (9/12), respectively. No complications related to left colonic surgery during IP chemotherapy were identified. The most frequent grade 3–4 toxicities were gastrointestinal toxicities (33.3%) and neutropenia (29.6%). The median progression-free survival was 19.5 months in all patients and 25.2 months in patients with primary ovarian cancer. Three institutional modifications to IP chemotherapy increased the completion rate for planned IP chemotherapy, even after left colonic surgery. Further studies involving a larger study cohort are required to confirm survival outcomes using these modifications.

1411 Amoebic Colitis: Inaccurate Diagnosis; Inappropriate Surgery

Global prevalence of symptomatic Amoebiasis (pathogen Entamoeba histolytica) is approximately 50 million cases per year, with an annual mortality of up to 100,000. Despite this, a diagnosis of amoebiasis is rarely considered in the UK. Transmission is via the faeco-oral route, person-to-person contact or oral-anal sexual contact. The majority of cases diagnosed in the UK are in international travellers or immigrants. Symptoms of amoebiasis can closely mirror those of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) resulting in diagnostic uncertainty. A misdiagnosis could result in treatment with corticosteroids, immunosuppressant or biological agents when standard treatment for amoebiasis is actually Metronidazole. In exceptional circumstances, a misdiagnosis of IBD may lead to a patient requiring colectomy and formation of end ileostomy due to an apparent failure of medical management. Emergency colonic surgery is associated with a risk of complications such as wound infections and collections, together with the psychological consequences of major illness and surgery. We report on two patients who have undergone emergency subtotal colectomy and end ileostomy in whom a diagnosis of amoebic colitis was made on histology. Both British Asian patients were under 55 years of age, had a travel history to India and presented with diarrhoea. The diagnosis of amoebiasis must be considered in the differential diagnosis for all returning travellers and immigrants who present with GI symptoms, consistent with IBD. A correct diagnosis allows appropriate, simple, curative treatment and avoids unnecessary surgery with its attendant morbidity. Polymerase chain reaction is the gold standard diagnostic test and is currently significantly under-utilised.