scholarly journals 1129: Factors affecting hospital length of stay after cesarean delivery

2020 ◽  
Vol 222 (1) ◽  
pp. S694-S695
Author(s):  
Kathy C. Matthews ◽  
Rebkah Tesfamariam ◽  
Stephen T. Chasen ◽  
Robin B. Kalish
1999 ◽  
Vol 52 (11) ◽  
pp. 1031-1036 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yael C Cohen ◽  
Haya R Rubin ◽  
Laurence Freedman ◽  
Benjamin Mozes

2013 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hassan Haghparast-Bidgoli ◽  
Soheil Saadat ◽  
Lennart Bogg ◽  
Mohammad Hossein Yarmohammadian ◽  
Marie Hasselberg

Spine ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 39 (6) ◽  
pp. 497-502 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bryce A. Basques ◽  
Michael C. Fu ◽  
Rafael A. Buerba ◽  
Daniel D. Bohl ◽  
Nicholas S. Golinvaux ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Julia K. Shinnick ◽  
Merima Ruhotina ◽  
Phinnara Has ◽  
Bridget J. Kelly ◽  
E. Christine Brousseau ◽  
...  

Objective The aim of this study is to assess the effect of a resident-led enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol for scheduled prelabor cesarean deliveries on hospital length of stay and postpartum opioid consumption. Study Design This retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent scheduled prelabor cesarean deliveries before and after implementation of an ERAS protocol at a single academic tertiary care institution. The primary outcome was length of stay following cesarean delivery. Secondary outcomes included protocol adherence, inpatient opioid consumption, and patient-centered outcomes. The protocol included multimodal analgesia and antiemetic medications, expedited urinary catheter removal, early discontinuation of maintenance intravenous fluids, and early ambulation. Results A total of 250 patients were included in the study: 122 in the pre-ERAS cohort and 128 in the post-ERAS cohort. There were no differences in baseline demographics, medical comorbidities, or cesarean delivery characteristics between the two groups. Following protocol implementation, hospital length of stay decreased by an average of 7.9 hours (pre-ERAS 82.1 vs. post-ERAS 74.2, p < 0.001). There was 89.8% adherence to the entire protocol as written. Opioid consumption decreased by an average of 36.5 mg of oxycodone per patient, with no significant differences in pain scores from postoperative day 1 to postoperative day 4 (all p > 0.05). Conclusion A resident-driven quality improvement project was associated with decreased length of hospital stay, decreased opioid consumption, and unchanged visual analog pain scores at the time of hospital discharge. Implementation of this ERAS protocol is feasible and effective. Key Points


2008 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. 447-451 ◽  
Author(s):  
Athanasios Xafenias ◽  
Ioannis Diakogiannis ◽  
Apostolos Iacovides ◽  
Konstantinos Fokas ◽  
Georgios Kaprinis

2017 ◽  
Vol 117 (3) ◽  
pp. 529-534 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ying Guo ◽  
Eugene Chang ◽  
Mehtap Bozkurt ◽  
Minjeong Park ◽  
Diane Liu ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-16
Author(s):  
Marcello Difonzo

Introduction. The clinical components of the rapid response system (RRS) are the afferent limb, to ensure identification of in-hospital patients who deteriorate and activation of a response, and the efferent limb, to provide the response. This review aims to evaluate the factors that influence the performance of the afferent limb in managing deteriorating ward patients and their effects on patient outcomes. Methods. A systematic review was performed for the years 1995–2017 by employing five electronic databases. Articles were included assessing the ability of the ward staffs to monitor, recognize, and escalate care to patient deterioration. The findings were summarized using a narrative approach. Results. Thirty-one studies met the inclusion criteria. The analysis revealed major themes enclosing several factors affecting management of patients having sudden deterioration. The monitoring and recognition process was conditioned by the lack of recording of physiological parameters, the influence of facilitators, including staff education and training, and barriers, including human and environmental factors, and poor compliance with the calling criteria. The escalation of care process highlighted the influence of cultural barriers and personal judgment on RRS activation. Mainly, delayed team calls were factors strongly associated with the increased risk of unplanned admissions to the intensive care unit and length of stay, hospital length of stay and mortality, and 30-day mortality. Conclusions. A combination of factors affects the timely identification and response to sudden deterioration by general ward staffs, leading to suboptimal care of patients, delayed or failed activation of RRS teams, and increased risks of worsening outcomes. The research efforts and clinical involvement to improve the governance of the factors limiting the performance of the afferent limb may ensure proper management of hospitalized patients showing physiological deterioration.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document