scholarly journals Comparison of Left Ventricular Outflow Geometry and Aortic Valve Area in Patients With Aortic Stenosis by 2-Dimensional Versus 3-Dimensional Echocardiography

2012 ◽  
Vol 109 (11) ◽  
pp. 1626-1631 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takeji Saitoh ◽  
Maiko Shiota ◽  
Masaki Izumo ◽  
Swaminatha V. Gurudevan ◽  
Kirsten Tolstrup ◽  
...  
Circulation ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 130 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeremy J Thaden ◽  
Michael Y Tsang ◽  
Saki Ito ◽  
Sorin V Pislaru ◽  
Vuyisile T Nkomo ◽  
...  

Introduction: Accurate stroke volume (SV) calculation is critical for calculating aortic valve area by echocardiography. 2D-Doppler estimation of SV (SV 2D ) assumes uniform blood flow velocities through the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT). Non-uniform flow through the LVOT, appreciated as spectral broadening of the LVOT Doppler signal, could result in inaccurate SV calculation. Hypothesis: Increased spectral broadening in the LVOT will result in overestimation of SV by the SV 2D method compared to 3D volumetric assessment of SV (SV 3D ). Methods: Fifty-one consecutive patients with aortic stenosis underwent comprehensive 2D-TTE and assessment of SV 3D . Patients with ≥ moderate mitral or aortic regurgitation were excluded. An LVOT pulse-wave Doppler signal with > 0.4 m/s difference between outer and inner edge of velocity spectral display (at time of peak velocity) was considered non-uniform flow (i.e., spectral broadening). Results: Spectral broadening was present in 33% of the cohort. These patients were commonly female with smaller ventricles and higher ejection fraction. Spectral broadening was associated with a significant overestimation of SV on Doppler-based measurements (101±20 ml vs 78±15 mL, SV 2D vs SV 3D , respectively; r=0.83, p<0.0001); such differences were not seen in patients with uniform flow velocities (82±15 vs 79±14 mL, r=0.83, p=0.03). Patient characteristics by spectral broadening are shown in table 1. Conclusion: In aortic stenosis patients with non-uniform flow, Doppler-based methods overestimated SV by 29.5% on average (maximum 64%) when compared to 3D methods. This results in a proportional increase in calculated valve area despite a similar mean gradient between groups. Substituting SV 3D resulted in similar SV, valve area, and mean gradient between uniform and non-uniform groups. When spectral broadening >0.40 cm/s is present, 3D volumetric assessment of SV should be considered for accurate estimation of aortic valve area.


Circulation ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 130 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sami Alnasser ◽  
Asim Cheema ◽  
Vamshi Kotha ◽  
Djeven Deva ◽  
Jeremy Edwards ◽  
...  

Background: Left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) measurement by Echo falsely assumes circular LVOT with implications for aortic valve area (AVA) determined using continuity equation. In this study, we investigated the utility of combining Echo Doppler and computed tomography (CT) based LVOT area for precise AVA assessment. Methods: AVA-echo was calculated using continuity equation and standard echocardiography techniques. CT-LVOT area was measured by 3 independent readers. Blinded measurements were obtained in candidates for percutaneous aortic valve replacement. AVA-CT was calculated using CT-LVOT area and echo Doppler measurements. The inter-observer variability for CT-LVOT area and correlation between AVA-echo and AVA-CT was analyzed using intra-class (ICC) and Spearman correlation coefficient. Results: Complete data for 66 patients was analyzed. The ICC for CT derived LVOT measurement by three observers was 0.96 demonstrating excellent reliability. The LVOT area by echo was significantly smaller than that obtained by CT (3.43±0.8 vs. 4.45±1.2 cm2, p<0.0001) and showing moderate correlation (r=0.66, p=0.006). Similarly, the AVA-echo was significantly lower compared to AVA-CT (0.76±0.46 vs. 0.97±0.53 cm2, p<0.0001). The correlation coefficient for AVA-echo and AVA-CT was 0.7 (p < 0.0001), 0.4 (p=0.06) and 0.9 (p<0.0001) for AVA-echo of 0.8 cm2 respectively. The regression analysis showed that AVA-CT could be predicted by applying a correction factor to the AVA-echo as AVA-CT = AVA-echo x 1.1+0.14. Conclusion: CT provides accurate and reliable LVOT assessment. Combining CT-LVOT and echo Doppler measurements result in a larger AVA compared to AVA-echo representing a true anatomic measurement. These findings have important implications for grading of aortic stenosis and management of patients with moderate to severe aortic stenosis.


2013 ◽  
Vol 34 (suppl 1) ◽  
pp. P277-P277
Author(s):  
G. Barone-Rochette ◽  
S. Pierard ◽  
S. Seldrum ◽  
C. De Meester De Ravensteen ◽  
J. Melchior ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document