Skip and save: utility of pelvic x-rays in the initial evaluation of blunt trauma patients

2015 ◽  
Vol 210 (6) ◽  
pp. 1076-1081 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jose Raul Soto ◽  
Cathy Zhou ◽  
David Hu ◽  
Antonio C. Arazoza ◽  
Ernest Dunn ◽  
...  
Injury ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 50 (2) ◽  
pp. 621
Author(s):  
Jessica van Trigt ◽  
Niels Schep ◽  
Rolf Peters ◽  
Carel Goslings ◽  
Tim Schepers ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (9) ◽  
pp. 724-727 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shahram Paydar ◽  
Fariborz Ghaffarpasand ◽  
Mehdi Foroughi ◽  
Ali Saberi ◽  
Maryam Dehghankhalili ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Luca GA Pivetta ◽  
Cristiano Below ◽  
Giovanna Z Rondini ◽  
Jacqueline AG Perlingero ◽  
José C Assef ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Background There is an excessive number of unnecessary chest X-rays (CXRs) in minor blunt trauma patients. Objective To identify, using routine clinical criteria, a subgroup of blunt trauma patients that do not require CXR for assessment. Materials and methods This was a retrospective analysis of trauma registry data collected over a 24-month period. Adult blunt trauma patients undergoing CXR on admission were analyzed. The following clinical criteria were assessed: Normal neurologic examination on admission (NNEx), hemodynamic stability (HS), normal physical examination of the chest on admission (NCEx), age ≤ 60 years, and absence of distracting injuries (Abbreviated Injury Scale >2 in head, abdomen, and extremities). These clinical criteria were progressively merged to select a group with lowest risk of exhibiting abnormal CXR on admission. Results Out of 4,647 patients submitted to CXR on admission, 268 (5.7%) had abnormal findings on scans. Of 2,897 patients admitted with NNEx, 116 (4.0%) had abnormal CXR. Of 2,426 patients with NNEx and HS, 74 (3.0%) had abnormal CXR. Of 1,698 patients with NNEx, HS, and NCEx, 24 (1.4%) had abnormal CXR. Of 1,347 patients with NNEx, HS, NCEx, and age < 60 years, 12 had thoracic injury (0.9% of total individuals receiving CXR). A total of 4 patients underwent chest drainage. Among 1,140 cases with all clinical criteria, 8 had confirmed thoracic injuries and 2 underwent chest drainage. Conclusion A subgroup of blunt trauma patients with low probability of exhibiting abnormalities on CXR at admission was identified. The need for CXR in this subgroup should be reviewed. How to cite this article Pivetta LGA, Parreira JG, Below C, Rondini GZ, Perlingero JAG, Assef JC. Optimizing Chest X-ray Indication in Blunt Trauma Patients using Clinical Criteria. Panam J Trauma Crit Care Emerg Surg 2017;6(1):30-34.


2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shahram Paydar ◽  
Hamed Ghoddusi Johari ◽  
Fariborz Ghaffarpasand ◽  
Danial Shahidian ◽  
Afsaneh Dehbozorgi ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 82 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea A. Zaw ◽  
Donovan Stewart ◽  
Jason S. Murry ◽  
David M. Hoang ◽  
Beatrice Sun ◽  
...  

Blunt aortic injury (BAI) after chest trauma is a potentially lethal condition. Rapid diagnosis is important to appropriately treat patients. The purpose of this study was to compare CT with intravenous contrast (CTI) to CT with angiography (CTA) in the initial evaluation of blunt chest trauma patients. This was a retrospective review of all blunt trauma patients who received a CTI or CTA during the initial evaluation at an urban Level I trauma center from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2013. Two-hundred and eighty-one trauma patients met inclusion criteria. Most, 167/281 (59%) received CTI and 114/281 (41%) received CTA. There were no differences between cohorts in age, gender, initial heart rate, systolic blood pressure, and Glasgow Coma Scale in emergency department. Mortality rates were similar for CTI and CTA (4% vs 8%, P = 0.20). CTI identified an injury in 54 per cent compared with 46 per cent in CTA ( P = 0.05). Overall, 2 per cent of patients had BAI with similar rates in CTI and CTA (2% vs 2%, P = 0.80). BAI was not missed using either CTI or CTA. Trauma patients studied with CTI had similar diagnostic findings as CTA. CTI may be preferable to CTA during the initial assessment for possible BAI because of a single contrast injection for whole body CT.


1995 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 191-195 ◽  
Author(s):  
G ERSOY ◽  
?? KARCIO??LU ◽  
Y ENG??NBA?? ◽  
O ERAY ◽  
C AYRIK

2011 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. 498-502 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fariborz Ghaffarpasand ◽  
Shahram Paydar ◽  
Hamidreza Abbasi ◽  
Shahram Bolandparvaz ◽  
Mehdi Foroughi ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 58 (4) ◽  
pp. S180
Author(s):  
B. Kea ◽  
R. Gamarallage ◽  
H. Vairamuthu ◽  
G. Prager ◽  
J. Fortman ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 000313482199866
Author(s):  
Emily Leede ◽  
Tatiana C. P. Cardenas ◽  
Brent J. Emigh ◽  
Lawrence H. Brown ◽  
Pedro G. Teixeira ◽  
...  

Background This study evaluates the utility of chest (CXR) and pelvis (PXR) X-ray, as adjuncts to the primary survey, in screening geriatric blunt trauma (GBT) patients for abdominal injury or need for laparotomy. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of patients 65-89 years in the 2014 National Trauma Data Bank. X-ray injuries were identified by ICD9 codes and defined as any injury felt to be readily detectable by a non-radiologist. X-ray findings were dichotomized as “both negative” (no injury presumptively apparent on CXR or PXR) or “either positive” (any injury presumptively apparent on CXR or PXR). Rates of abdominal injuries and laparotomy were compared and used to calculate sensitivity and specificity. The primary outcomes were abdominal injury and laparotomy. The secondary outcomes included mortality, ventilator days, and hospital days. Results A total of 202 553 patients met criteria. Overall, 9% of patients with either positive X-rays had abdominal injury and 2% laparotomy vs. 1.1% and .3% with both negative ( P < .001). The specificity for any positive X-ray was 79% for abdominal injury and 78% for laparotomy. The sensitivity was 69% for abdominal injury and laparotomy. The either positive group had fewer ventilator days (.3 vs. .8, P < .0001), longer length of stay (7 vs. 5, P < .0001), and higher mortality (6% vs. 4%, P < .0001) vs both negative. Conclusion CXR and PXR can be used to assess for intra-abdominal injury and need for laparotomy. GBT patients with either positive X-rays should continue workup regardless of mechanism due to the high specificity of this tool for abdominal injury and need for laparotomy.


Injury ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 49 (11) ◽  
pp. 2024-2031 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica van Trigt ◽  
Niels W.L. Schep ◽  
Rolf W. Peters ◽  
J. Carel Goslings ◽  
Tim Schepers ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document