scholarly journals Effect of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy vs laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass on weight loss in Egyptian patients with morbid obesity

2022 ◽  
pp. 103235
Author(s):  
Mohamad Baheeg ◽  
Saed A. Elgohary ◽  
Mohamed Tag-Eldin ◽  
Ahmed M.E. Hegab ◽  
Mahmoud S. Shehata ◽  
...  
JAMA ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 319 (3) ◽  
pp. 255 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ralph Peterli ◽  
Bettina Karin Wölnerhanssen ◽  
Thomas Peters ◽  
Diana Vetter ◽  
Dino Kröll ◽  
...  

QJM ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 114 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Khaled A Gawdat ◽  
Basem H El Shayeb ◽  
Kerolos R Naguib

Abstract Background Obesity is caused by a combination of excessive food energy intake, lack of physical activity, and genetic susceptibility, although a few cases are caused primarily by genes, endocrine disorders, medications, or psychiatric illness. The main aim of obesity therapy is weight loss and maintenance by dietary interventions and increased physical activity. Aim of the Work to review two of the most commonly performed modalities of weight loss namely Sleeve Gastrectomy, Gastric Bypass, and to study their early post-operative complications, outcomes, effects regarding excess body weight loss (EBWL), life style changes and sustainability. Patients and Methods This is a prospective comparative randomize study included 40 patients presented with morbid obesity with BMI range between (40 to 60 kg/m2) were treated 20 cases by laparoscopic sleeve Gastrectomy and 20 cases by laparoscopic Gastric Bypass (15 cases one anastomosis gastric bypass – 5 cases Roux-en-Y bypass) in Ain Shams Hospital during the period from October 2017 till May 2018. Cases were followed up monthly for 6 months and after 1 year. Results Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy has higher incidence of complications (15%) than the incidence of complications of Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass (5%). Conclusion Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy and Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass are both safe and effective procedures for the surgical management of morbid obesity. Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass has slightly higher mean of (EBWL%) than Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy at 6 months, and a higher mean of (EBWL%) than Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy at 1 year follow up.


JAMA ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 319 (3) ◽  
pp. 241 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paulina Salminen ◽  
Mika Helmiö ◽  
Jari Ovaska ◽  
Anne Juuti ◽  
Marja Leivonen ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bandar Albeladi ◽  
Céline Bourbao-Tournois ◽  
Noel Huten

Background. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) is one of the most widely used bariatric procedures today, and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) as a single-stage procedure for the treatment of morbid obesity is becoming increasingly popular in Europe. The aim of this study was to compare short- and midterm results between LRYGB and LSG.Methods. An observational retrospective study from a database of patients undergoing LRYGB and LSG between January 2008 and June 2011. Seventy patients (mean age 39 years) were included. Patients were followed at 6, 12, and 18 months. Operative time, length of stay, weight loss, comorbidity improvement or resolution, postoperative complications, reinterventions and mortality were evaluated.Results. Thirty-six LRYGB and 34 LSG were included. Mean operative time of LSG was 106 min while LRYGB was 196 min (). Differences in length of stay, early and late complications, and improvement or resolution in comorbidities were not significant (). Eighteen months after surgery, average excess weight loss was 77.6% in LRYGB and 57.1% in LSG (). There was no surgery-related mortality.Conclusions. Both LRYGB and LSG are safe procedures that provide good results in weight loss and resolution of comorbidities at 18 months.


Author(s):  
Tantawi Abdel Naeem Mohamed ◽  
Salah Abdel- Razik ◽  
Ayman Mohamed Hassanien ◽  
Tohamy A. Tohamy ◽  
Ashraf Abdel Azeem ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 265 (3) ◽  
pp. 466-473 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ralph Peterli ◽  
Bettina Karin Wölnerhanssen ◽  
Diana Vetter ◽  
Philipp Nett ◽  
Markus Gass ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document