Multidimensional assessment of vocal changes in benign vocal fold lesions after voice therapy

2013 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 291-297 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Schindler ◽  
Francesco Mozzanica ◽  
Patrizia Maruzzi ◽  
Murat Atac ◽  
Valeria De Cristofaro ◽  
...  
2006 ◽  
Vol 135 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. P195-P195
Author(s):  
Seth M Cohen ◽  
C Gaelyn Garrett

2018 ◽  
Vol 160 (3) ◽  
pp. 512-518 ◽  
Author(s):  
Milan R. Amin ◽  
Stratos Achlatis ◽  
Shirley Gherson ◽  
Yixin Fang ◽  
Binhuan Wang ◽  
...  

Objectives (1) To determine the short-term effectiveness of oral steroids in women with benign vocal fold lesions and (2) to determine the effectiveness of adjuvant oral steroids in women undergoing voice therapy for benign vocal fold lesions. Study Design Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Setting Tertiary voice care center. Subjects and Methods Thirty-six patients undergoing voice therapy for the treatment of phonotraumatic vocal fold lesions randomly received either a 4-day course of oral steroids or a placebo prior to initiating voice therapy. Voice Handicap Index–10 (VHI-10) scores, video and audioperceptual analyses, acoustic and aerodynamic analyses at baseline, and patient perception of improvement after a short course of steroids or a placebo and at the conclusion of voice therapy were collected. Results Thirty patients completed the study, of whom 27 (only female) were analyzed. The primary outcome measure, VHI-10, did not improve after the 4-day course of steroids or placebo. Secondary measures similarly showed no improvement with steroids relative to placebo. Voice therapy demonstrated a positive effect on both VHI-10 and patient-perceived improvement of voice in all subjects. Conclusion A short course of oral steroids did not benefit women with phonotraumatic vocal fold lesions. In addition, steroids had little beneficial effect when used adjunctively with voice therapy in this patient cohort.


2016 ◽  
Vol 155 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie Misono ◽  
Schelomo Marmor ◽  
Nelson Roy ◽  
Ted Mau ◽  
Seth M. Cohen

Objectives To assess perspectives of patients with voice problems and identify factors associated with the likelihood of referral to voice therapy via the CHEER (Creating Healthcare Excellence through Education and Research) practice-based research network infrastructure. Study Design Prospectively enrolled cross-sectional study of CHEER patients seen for a voice problem (dysphonia). Setting The CHEER network of community and academic sites. Methods Patient-reported demographic information, nature and severity of voice problems, clinical diagnoses, and proposed treatment plans were collected. The relationship between patient factors and voice therapy referral was investigated. Results Patients (N = 249) were identified over 12 months from 10 sites comprising 30 otolaryngology physicians. The majority were women (68%) and white (82%). Most patients reported a recurrent voice problem (72%) and symptom duration >4 weeks (89%). The most commonly reported voice-related diagnoses were vocal strain, reflux, and benign vocal fold lesions. Sixty-seven percent of enrolled patients reported receiving a recommendation for voice therapy. After adjusting for sociodemographic and other factors, diagnoses including vocal strain/excessive tension and vocal fold paralysis and academic practice type were associated with increased likelihood of reporting a referral for voice therapy. Conclusions The CHEER network successfully enrolled a representative sample of patients with dysphonia. Common diagnoses were vocal strain, reflux, and benign vocal fold lesions; commonly reported treatment recommendations included speech/voice therapy and antireflux medication. Recommendation for speech/voice therapy was associated with academic practice type.


2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 8-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arpit Sharma ◽  
Jyoti Dabholkar ◽  
Nitish Virmani

ABSTRACT Introduction Benign vocal cord lesions cause significant dysphonia by disrupting the normal vibratory function of the vocal fold mucosa. Multidimensional assessment of voice characteristics allows for an accurate analysis of voice impairment and can be used to assess the outcome of different treatment modalities. Aims To evaluate the outcome in patients treated for benign vocal fold lesions using multidimensional voice assessment Materials and methods Thirty adult patients with benign vocal fold lesions were treated according to standard protocols and followed up for 6 months. Voice was evaluated by visual analog scale (VAS), GRBAS (grade, roughness, breathiness, asthenia, strain) scale, maximum phonation time (MPT), S/Z ratio, and acoustic parameters using PRAAT. Pre- and posttreatment voice was compared. Results Benign lesions observed were vocal polyps (16), vocal nodules (7), vocal fold cysts (5), vocal cord papilloma (1), and sulcus vocalis (1). Mean VAS rating improved from 7.5 to 2 at 3 months and 1.6 at 6 months. Mean GRBAS score improved from 7.5 to 2.96 at 3 months and 2.3 at 6 months. Maximum phonation time increased from 9.43 seconds to 14.16 seconds at 3 months and 14.46 seconds at 6 months. S/Z ratio reduced from 1.37 to 1.16 at 3 months and 1.15 at 6 months. Jitter reduced from 1.81 to 1% at 3 months and 0.97% at 6 months; shimmer decreased from 6.07 to 2.19% at 3 months and to 2.03% at 6 months. Harmonic-to-noise ratio values improved from 8.01 to 10.78 dB at 3 months and 10.96 dB at 6 months; mean F0 increased from 207.27 to 217.89 Hz at 3 months and 219.65 Hz at 6 months. Conclusion A single measurement of voice cannot be used as a reliable outcome measure. Perceptual, aerodynamic, acoustic, and self-analysis together allow a multidimensional assessment of voice characteristics. How to cite this article Virmani N, Sharma A, Dabholkar J. Outcome Analysis in Patients with Benign Vocal Fold Lesions. Int J Phonosurg Laryngol 2016;6(1):8-13.


2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 474-482
Author(s):  
Sarah L. Schneider

PurposeVocal fold motion impairment (VFMI) can be the result of iatrogenic or traumatic injury or may be idiopathic in nature. It can result in glottic incompetence leading to changes in vocal quality and ease. Associated voice complaints may include breathiness, roughness, diplophonia, reduced vocal intensity, feeling out of breath with talking, and vocal fatigue with voice use. A comprehensive interprofessional voice evaluation includes auditory-perceptual voice evaluation, laryngeal examination including videostroboscopy, acoustic and aerodynamic voice measures. These components provide valuable insight into laryngeal structure and function and individual voice use patterns and, in conjunction with stimulability testing, help identify candidacy for voice therapy and choice of therapeutic techniques.ConclusionA comprehensive, interprofessional evaluation of patients with VFMI is necessary to assess the role of voice therapy and develop a treatment plan. Although there is no efficacy data to support specific voice therapy techniques for treating VFMI, considerations for various techniques are provided.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document