scholarly journals Speech audiometry in noise: Development of the French-language VRB (vocale rapide dans le bruit) test

2018 ◽  
Vol 135 (5) ◽  
pp. 315-319 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Leclercq ◽  
C. Renard ◽  
C. Vincent
1999 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 30-43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michel Picard ◽  
Roch Banville ◽  
Théodor Barbarosie ◽  
Michaela Manolache

PMLA ◽  
1935 ◽  
Vol 50 (4) ◽  
pp. 1295-1299
Author(s):  
H. Carrington Lancaster

1969 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 176-176

In the November 1968 issue of this journal, Margaret M. Martyn’s name was misspelled Martin on page 315. In the same issue, page 325, column 2 (Jerger, Speaks, and Trammell, “A New Approach to Speech Audiometry”), the sentence reading “Whenever the loss is sloping, however, the PB area underestimates and the SSI area overestimates the amount of handicap” should read as follows: “Whenever the loss is sloping, however, the PB area overestimates and the SSI area underestimates the amount of the handicap.”


1968 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 817-824
Author(s):  
David J. Lilly ◽  
Richard L. Franzen

Between 1956 and 1958, Technisonic Studios changed the groove shape on the lateral-cut monophonic recordings that they supply for speech audiometry. A stylus that has a spherical tip with a radius of 1/1000 inch (1.0 mil) is the most appropriate one for reproducing (playing) Technisonic discs pressed since 1959. The tone arms on many speech audiometers, however, still are equipped with a larger (2.5 mil) stylus. This report presents a rationale for using the 1.0-mil stylus. Methods are suggested for identification of groove shape on the Technisonic discs and for identification of stylus size.


2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Takahashi ◽  
N. Maionchi-Pino ◽  
A. Magnan ◽  
R. Kawashima

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document