Corrigendum to “A novel approach to multi attribute group decision making based on trapezoidal interval type-2 fuzzy soft sets” [Appl. Math. Model. 37 (2013) 4948–4971]

There are many uncertain problems in practical life which need decision-making with soft sets and fuzzy soft sets. The purpose of this paper is to develop an approach to effectively solve the group decision-making problem based on fuzzy soft sets. Firstly, we present an adjustable approach to solve the decision-making problems based on fuzzy soft sets. Then, we introduce knowledge measure and divergence degree based on α-similarity relation to determine the experts’ weights. Further, we develop an effective group decision-making approach with unknown experts’ weights. Finally, sensitivity analysis about the parameters and comparison analysis with other existing methods are given.

Download Full-text

An interval type-2 hesitant fuzzy best-worst method

Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems ◽

10.3233/jifs-202801 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 1-28

Author(s):

Ashraf Norouzi ◽

Hossein Razavi hajiagha

Keyword(s):

Decision Making ◽

Fuzzy Sets ◽

Group Decision Making ◽

Group Decision ◽

Fuzzy Ahp ◽

Uncertain Data ◽

Interval Type ◽

Best Worst Method

Multi criteria decision-making problems are usually encounter implicit, vague and uncertain data. Interval type-2 fuzzy sets (IT2FS) are widely used to develop various MCDM techniques especially for cases with uncertain linguistic approximation. However, there are few researches that extend IT2FS-based MCDM techniques into qualitative and group decision-making environment. The present study aims to adopt a combination of hesitant and interval type-2 fuzzy sets to develop an extension of Best-Worst method (BWM). The proposed approach provides a flexible and convenient way to depict the experts’ hesitant opinions especially in group decision-making context through a straightforward procedure. The proposed approach is called IT2HF-BWM. Some numerical case studies from literature have been used to provide illustrations about the feasibility and effectiveness of our proposed approach. Besides, a comparative analysis with an interval type-2 fuzzy AHP is carried out to evaluate the results of our proposed approach. In each case, the consistency ratio was calculated to determine the reliability of results. The findings imply that the proposed approach not only provides acceptable results but also outperforms the traditional BWM and its type-1 fuzzy extension.

Download Full-text

An Interactive Signed Distance Approach for Multiple Criteria Group Decision-Making Based on Simple Additive Weighting Method with Incomplete Preference Information Defined by Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Sets

International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making ◽

10.1142/s0219622014500229 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 13 (05) ◽

pp. 979-1012 ◽

Cited By ~ 10

Author(s):

Ting-Yu Chen

Keyword(s):

Decision Making ◽

Group Decision Making ◽

Group Decision ◽

Preference Information ◽

Incomplete Preference ◽

Signed Distance ◽

Decision Making Problem ◽

Simple Additive Weighting ◽

Interval Type

Interval type-2 fuzzy sets (T2FSs) with interval membership grades are suitable for dealing with imprecision or uncertainties in many real-world problems. In the Interval type-2 fuzzy context, the aim of this paper is to develop an interactive signed distance-based simple additive weighting (SAW) method for solving multiple criteria group decision-making problems with linguistic ratings and incomplete preference information. This paper first formulates a group decision-making problem with uncertain linguistic variables and their transformation to interval type-2 trapezoidal fuzzy numbers. Concerning the relative importance of multiple decision-makers and group consensus of fuzzy opinions, a procedure using hybrid averages is then employed to construct a collective decision matrix. By an appropriate extension of the classical SAW approach, this paper utilizes the concept of signed distances and establishes an integrated programming model to manage multi-criteria group decisions under the incomplete and inconsistent preference structure. Further, an interactive procedure is established for group decision making. Finally, the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed methods are illustrated by a collaborative decision-making problem of patient-centered care (PCC).

Download Full-text