Same Day Total Hip Arthroplasty Performed at an Ambulatory Surgical Center: 90-Day Complication Rate on 549 Patients

2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 1103-1106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregg R. Klein ◽  
Jason M. Posner ◽  
Harlan B. Levine ◽  
Mark A. Hartzband
2020 ◽  
pp. 112070002094879
Author(s):  
Vittorio Bordoni ◽  
Niccolò Marelli ◽  
Davide Previtali ◽  
Paolo Gaffurini ◽  
Giuseppe Filardo ◽  
...  

Background: There is no consensus about the safety of outpatient total hip arthroplasty (THA). Therefore, the purpose of this meta-analysis was to quantitatively evaluate and compare outpatient and inpatient THA studies in terms of complication and readmission rates. Methods: A systematic search of the literature was performed on 26 July 2019 on PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane library, and on the grey literature databases. The papers thus collected were used for a meta-analysis comparing outpatient and inpatient THA in terms of complication and readmission rates. Risk of bias and quality of evidence were defined according to Cochrane guidelines. The PRISMA guidelines were used to determine which papers to include in this study. Results: The literature search resulted in 2317 articles; of these, 8 articles were used for the meta-analysis. A total of 66,971 patients were included, of which 1428 were THA outpatients. The overall complication rate for outpatient THAs was 3.0%, while inpatient THAs had an overall complication rate of 4.7%. The readmission rate was 1.4% in outpatient THAs and 3.0% in inpatient THAs. Only 6 studies reported the number of deaths, which ranged from 0% to 0.01%. The included studies present a moderate risk of bias and, according to GRADE guidelines, the level of evidence for complications and readmissions is very low. Conclusions: This meta-analysis documented that outpatient THA is a feasible approach since it does not increase complications or readmissions with respect to inpatient THA, but the available studies present a moderate risk of bias and the quality of evidence of these findings is very low. Future high-level studies are needed to confirm results and indications for outpatient THA.


2016 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 658-661 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tatsuya Tamaki ◽  
Kazuhiro Oinuma ◽  
Yoko Miura ◽  
Hidetaka Higashi ◽  
Ryutaku Kaneyama ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 28 (8) ◽  
pp. 45-47 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine M. Pui ◽  
Mathias P. Bostrom ◽  
Geoffrey H. Westrich ◽  
Craig J. Della Valle ◽  
William Macaulay ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Weiguang Yu ◽  
Xiulan Han ◽  
Wenli Chen ◽  
Shuai Mao ◽  
Mingdong Zhao ◽  
...  

Abstract Background At present, it is unclear which device (uncemented or cemented total hip arthroplasty [UTA or CTA, respectively]) is more suitable for the conversion of a failed proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA). The aim of this review was to assess the outcomes of failed PFNAs converted to a UTA or CTA device in elderly individuals with intertrochanteric femoral fractures (IFFs). Methods Two hundred fifty-eight elderly individuals (258 hips) with IFFs who underwent a conversion to a UTA or CTA device following failed PFNAs during 2007–2017 were retrospectively identified from the China Southern Medical Centre (CSMC) database. The primary endpoint was the Harris Hip Score (HHS); secondary endpoint was the key orthopaedic complication rate. Results The median follow-up was 65 months (60–69 months). Significant distinctions were observed (87.26 ± 16.62 for UTA vs. 89.32 ± 16.08 for CTA, p = 0.021; 86.61 ± 12.24 for symptomatic UTA vs. 88.68 ± 13.30 for symptomatic CTA, p = 0.026). A significant difference in the overall key orthopaedic complication rate was detected (40.8% [40/98] vs. 19.0% [19/100], p = 0.001). Apparent distinctions were detected in terms of the rate of revision, loosening, and periprosthetic fracture (11.2% for UTA vs 3.0% for CTA, p = 0.025; 13.2% for UTA vs 5.0% for CTA, p = 0.043; 10.2% for UTA vs 3.0% for CTA, p = 0.041, respectively). Conclusion For elderly individuals with IFFs who suffered a failed PFNA, CTA devices may have a noteworthy advantage in regard to the revision rate and the rate of key orthopaedic complications compared with UTA devices, and CTA revision should be performed as soon as possible, regardless of whether these individuals have symptoms.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linbo Peng ◽  
Junfeng Zeng ◽  
Yi Zeng ◽  
Yuangang Wu ◽  
Jing Yang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Verify if the elevated preoperative International Normalized Ratio (INR) can increase transfusion and complication rate in primary total hip arthroplasty.Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the database of adults who underwent primary total hip arthroplasty between 2014 to 2018 by the same surgeon. 552 cases were assigned into 3 groups by preoperative INR class: INR≤0.9, 0.9<INR<1.0, and INR≥1.0 eventually. We regarded the transfusion rate as the primary outcome. We also included perioperative blood loss, maximum Hb-drop, postoperative anemia needs medicine, length of stay (LOS), re-operation, the complication rate in 90 days and mortality as the secondary outcomes. Univariable analyses were utilized to compare baselines and outcomes between groups. Binary Logistic Regression was used to adjust differences of baselines among groups.Results: All the cases had an INR<1.5. Among all the cases, 93(16.8%) had INR≤0.9, 268 (48.6%) had 0.9<INR<1.0, and 191 (34.6%) had INR≥1.0, respectively. In the univariable analyses, with the INR elevated, The transfusion rates increased from 1.08% for INR≤0.9, 1.12% for 0.9<INR<1.0 to 5.76% for INR≥1.0 (p<0.05). The overall complication rate increased from 10.8% for INR≤0.9, 16.4% for 0.9<INR<1.0 to 22.5% for INR≥1.0 (p<0.05). When controlling for the demographics and comorbidities characteristics, there was no statistically significant difference when evaluating the odds of transfusion nor overall complication rate between the groups (p>0.05).Conclusions: The transfusion and complication rate cannot increase along with the INR elevated in primary THA. With the improvement of arthroplasty protocol and use of tranexamic acid, the INR<1.5 was still a conventional safe threshold.


Author(s):  
Itay Perets ◽  
John P. Walsh ◽  
Mary R. Close ◽  
Brian H. Mu ◽  
Leslie C. Yuen ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 215145932110132
Author(s):  
Zhenfa Zhang ◽  
Guixing Xu ◽  
Lei Cao ◽  
Wei Sun ◽  
Xianshang Zeng ◽  
...  

Introduction: Patient outcomes following modern dual-mobility cup total hip arthroplasty (DM-THA) remains a concern. Few reports have focused on the use of modern DM-THA in the setting of Asian populations for displaced osteoporotic femoral neck fractures (FNFs). This study aimed to investigate the outcomes of Chinese population with displaced osteoporotic FNFs initially treated with modern DM-THA. Materials and Methods: Data from 112 consecutive patients (112 hips) with displaced osteoporotic FNFs initially treated with modern DM-THA during 2011-2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Follow-ups were performed at 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and then every 1 year after surgery. The primary endpoint was the Harris Hip Score (HHS); the secondary endpoint was the main orthopedic complication rate. Results: The mean HHS improved from 58.62 (±15.79) prior to surgery to 86.13 (±9.92) at the final follow-up. The main complication rate was 14.2% (16/112). Sixteen complications in 10 patients were recorded. Of the 16 complications, there were 2 (1.7%) cases requiring revision DM-THA, 3 (2.6%) cases of loosening, 2 (1.7%) cases of migration, 3 (2.6%) intra-prosthetic dislocation (IPD), 4 (3.5%) cases of tilting, and 2 (1.7%) cases of severe wear. The need for revision was attributed to prosthesis loosening associated with poor bony quality. Conclusion: In patients with displaced osteoporotic FNFs, DM-THA may yield favorable functional outcomes and a low rate of main orthopedic complications, in particular, a low dislocation rate.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document