scholarly journals Kidney transplantation: A new era of laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy in Indonesia

2018 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-58 ◽  
Author(s):  
Albertus Marcelino ◽  
Chaidir Arif Mochtar ◽  
Irfan Wahyudi ◽  
Agus Rizal Hamid
2008 ◽  
Vol 53 (5) ◽  
pp. 1074-1078 ◽  
Author(s):  
Markus Giessing ◽  
Serdar Deger ◽  
Jan Roigas ◽  
Dietmar Schnorr ◽  
Florian Fuller ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 75 (9) ◽  
pp. 1505-1512 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Daniel Mullins ◽  
Simu K. Thomas ◽  
Fran??oise G. Pradel ◽  
Stephen T. Bartlett

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 449-455 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giampaolo Siena ◽  
Graziano Vignolini ◽  
Andrea Mari ◽  
Vincenzo Li Marzi ◽  
Simone Caroassai ◽  
...  

Purpose. To describe our initial experience with a full robot-assisted approach for living donor nephrectomy (RALDN) and kidney transplantation (RAKT) in a dedicated twin operating room. Methods. From January to December 2017, 5 cases of RALDN and RAKT were performed in a single high-volume robotic center. All patients underwent a standard left RALDN. The renal hilum was controlled with Hem-O-Lok clips (WECK) and the kidney extracted through a Pfannenstiel incision. RAKT was performed according to the Vattikuti Urology Institute–Medanta technique. Results. RALDN: median estimated blood loss was 182 mL (range = 80-450 mL), no postoperative blood transfusion was required. The median (range) warm ischemia time was 175 (90-220 seconds). No conversion was registered. Median console time was 143 minutes (range = 115-220 minutes). No major surgical intraoperative and postoperative early and late complications occurred. RAKT: all 5 patients successfully underwent RAKT. Median (range) console time was 230 (190-200) minutes, vascular suture time was 58.7 (48-73) minutes, cold ischemia time was 46.2 (30-88) minutes, and rewarming time was 61.2 (55-72) minutes. No conversion was required. No major surgical intraoperative and postoperative early and late complications occurred. Mean glomerular filtration rate at days 1, 3, and 7 postoperatively was 26, 42, and 57 (range = 6-90) mL/min/1.73 m2, respectively. No case of delayed graft function was observed. No anastomosis revision, urological complications, lymphocele, and surgical site infection occurred. Conclusions. In our experience, RALDN and RAKT are safe and effective. The intuitiveness of the robotic approach provided substantial benefits both for the living donor and recipient from the very beginning of our series. No intraoperative and postoperative complications occurred.


2013 ◽  
Vol 95 (1) ◽  
pp. 100-105 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pranjal Modi ◽  
Bipinchandra Pal ◽  
Jayesh Modi ◽  
Suresh Singla ◽  
Chirag Patel ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anupamaa Seshadri ◽  
Sayeed Malek

Kidney transplantation is the treatment of choice for patients with end-stage renal disease. This review discusses the surgical aspects of kidney transplantation in detail, beginning with the important features of the preoperative evaluation of a potential transplant recipient. We then explain in detail the technical aspects of living donor nephrectomy and kidney transplantation and provide guidance for managing variability in donor organ anatomy. Immediate postoperative management of the kidney transplant patient is briefly discussed. Finally, this review addresses the important postoperative complications to be aware of in the kidney transplant patient and management strategies, as well as outcomes of kidney transplantation. Key words: chronic kidney disease, deceased donor transplantation, delayed graft function, kidney transplant, living donor nephrectomy, living donor transplantation, lymphocele, renal artery stenosis, transplant workup, urologic complications


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document