Surgical Aspects of Kidney Transplantation

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anupamaa Seshadri ◽  
Sayeed Malek

Kidney transplantation is the treatment of choice for patients with end-stage renal disease. This review discusses the surgical aspects of kidney transplantation in detail, beginning with the important features of the preoperative evaluation of a potential transplant recipient. We then explain in detail the technical aspects of living donor nephrectomy and kidney transplantation and provide guidance for managing variability in donor organ anatomy. Immediate postoperative management of the kidney transplant patient is briefly discussed. Finally, this review addresses the important postoperative complications to be aware of in the kidney transplant patient and management strategies, as well as outcomes of kidney transplantation. Key words: chronic kidney disease, deceased donor transplantation, delayed graft function, kidney transplant, living donor nephrectomy, living donor transplantation, lymphocele, renal artery stenosis, transplant workup, urologic complications

2020 ◽  
Vol 104 (11-12) ◽  
pp. 859-864
Author(s):  
Lucas Broudeur ◽  
Georges Karam ◽  
Reshma Rana Magar ◽  
Pascal Glemain ◽  
Thomas Loubersac ◽  
...  

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Right kidney living donor transplantation is considered more difficult and associated with more complications. The objective was to evaluate donor safety and graft function of right hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (HALDN). <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A total of 270 consecutive HALDN procedures have been performed in our institution up to April 2017. We retrospectively compared the outcomes of right-sided nephrectomy (R-HALDN) to left-sided nephrectomy (L-HALDN) to evaluate donor safety and graft function of R-HALDN. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Sixty-seven right kidneys were removed for functional asymmetry in favour of left kidney (35/67) or left kidney multiple arteries (28/67). Among the donors, neither conversion to open surgery nor preoperative blood transfusion was necessary. There was no significant difference in operative time, compared to L-HALDN group (170 ± 37 min vs. 171 ± 32 min; <i>p</i> value = 0.182). Warm ischaemia time was significantly longer for R-HALDN (4.0 ± 1.6 min vs. 3.0 ± 1.7 min; <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001). There was no significant difference in terms of post-operative complications and serum Cr levels. Among the recipients, there were no graft venous thrombosis. There was no significant difference in delayed graft function (3 for R-HALDN group and 8 for L-HALDN group; <i>p</i> value = 0.847), serum Cr levels, and graft survival. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> R-HALDN is a safe procedure for kidney donors, with excellent graft function for the recipients, compared to L-HALDN.


2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wolfgang Baar ◽  
Ulrich Goebel ◽  
Hartmut Buerkle ◽  
Bernd Jaenigen ◽  
Kai Kaufmann ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 53 (5) ◽  
pp. 1074-1078 ◽  
Author(s):  
Markus Giessing ◽  
Serdar Deger ◽  
Jan Roigas ◽  
Dietmar Schnorr ◽  
Florian Fuller ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-58 ◽  
Author(s):  
Albertus Marcelino ◽  
Chaidir Arif Mochtar ◽  
Irfan Wahyudi ◽  
Agus Rizal Hamid

2003 ◽  
Vol 75 (9) ◽  
pp. 1505-1512 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Daniel Mullins ◽  
Simu K. Thomas ◽  
Fran??oise G. Pradel ◽  
Stephen T. Bartlett

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 449-455 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giampaolo Siena ◽  
Graziano Vignolini ◽  
Andrea Mari ◽  
Vincenzo Li Marzi ◽  
Simone Caroassai ◽  
...  

Purpose. To describe our initial experience with a full robot-assisted approach for living donor nephrectomy (RALDN) and kidney transplantation (RAKT) in a dedicated twin operating room. Methods. From January to December 2017, 5 cases of RALDN and RAKT were performed in a single high-volume robotic center. All patients underwent a standard left RALDN. The renal hilum was controlled with Hem-O-Lok clips (WECK) and the kidney extracted through a Pfannenstiel incision. RAKT was performed according to the Vattikuti Urology Institute–Medanta technique. Results. RALDN: median estimated blood loss was 182 mL (range = 80-450 mL), no postoperative blood transfusion was required. The median (range) warm ischemia time was 175 (90-220 seconds). No conversion was registered. Median console time was 143 minutes (range = 115-220 minutes). No major surgical intraoperative and postoperative early and late complications occurred. RAKT: all 5 patients successfully underwent RAKT. Median (range) console time was 230 (190-200) minutes, vascular suture time was 58.7 (48-73) minutes, cold ischemia time was 46.2 (30-88) minutes, and rewarming time was 61.2 (55-72) minutes. No conversion was required. No major surgical intraoperative and postoperative early and late complications occurred. Mean glomerular filtration rate at days 1, 3, and 7 postoperatively was 26, 42, and 57 (range = 6-90) mL/min/1.73 m2, respectively. No case of delayed graft function was observed. No anastomosis revision, urological complications, lymphocele, and surgical site infection occurred. Conclusions. In our experience, RALDN and RAKT are safe and effective. The intuitiveness of the robotic approach provided substantial benefits both for the living donor and recipient from the very beginning of our series. No intraoperative and postoperative complications occurred.


2002 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 208-211 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas P. Slakey ◽  
Julie Cauvin Hahn ◽  
Ethan Rogers ◽  
Philippe M. Gauthier ◽  
Gilberto Ruiz-Deya ◽  
...  

Context Laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy has been shown to be a safe method for removing kidneys for transplantation, but concerns have been raised regarding safety and long-term kidney function. Objective To compare safety and long-term kidney function in hand-assisted laparoscopic, pure laparoscopic, and traditional open living donor nephrectomy. Method The charts of 48 patients with more than 1 year follow-up were reviewed. Thirty-four consecutive patients underwent laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy, and 14 had open donor nephrectomy. All kidneys functioned immediately at transplantation. In the laparoscopic group, 11 had the pure laparoscopic technique, and 23 patients had hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy. Results Total operative and warm ischemic times were reduced with the hand-assisted technique when compared with pure laparoscopy. Operative and warm ischemic times were similar in open nephrectomy and hand-assisted laparoscopy. Long-term follow-up of serum creatinine levels revealed no significant differences between the 3 groups. Complication rates in the 3 groups were similar. Conclusion Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy appears to be comparable to open donor nephrectomy in terms of safety and long-term graft function.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document