scholarly journals Reported Technical Aspects of Type II SLAP Lesion Repairs in Athletes

Author(s):  
Jack W. Weick ◽  
Will B. Workman ◽  
Christopher J. Bush ◽  
Katherine A. McCollum ◽  
Hiroyuki Sugaya ◽  
...  
2008 ◽  
Vol 57 (3) ◽  
pp. 481-484
Author(s):  
Koichi Kiyota ◽  
Yozo Shibata ◽  
Teruaki Izaki ◽  
Tsuyoshi Shinoda ◽  
Takeshi Teratani ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Francesco Franceschi ◽  
Umile Giuseppe Longo ◽  
Laura Ruzzini ◽  
Giacomo Rizzello ◽  
Rocco Papalia ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 247-253 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Franceschi ◽  
Umile Giuseppe Longo ◽  
Laura Ruzzini ◽  
Giacomo Rizzello ◽  
Nicola Maffulli ◽  
...  

Background Arthroscopic management has been recommended for some superior labrum anterior and posterior (SLAP) lesions, but no studies have focused on patients over 50 years of age with rotator cuff tear and a type II SLAP lesion. Hypothesis In patients over 50 years of age with an arthroscopically confirmed lesion of the rotator cuff and a type II SLAP lesion, there is no difference between (1) repair of both lesions and (2) repair of the rotator cuff tear without repair of the SLAP II lesion but with a tenotomy of the long head of the biceps. Study Design Randomized controlled clinical trial; Level of evidence, 1. Methods We recruited 63 patients. In 31 patients, we repaired the rotator cuff and the type II SLAP lesion (group 1). In the other 32 patients, we repaired the rotator cuff and tenotomized the long head of the biceps (group 2). Seven patients (2 in group 1 and 5 in group 2) were lost to final follow-up. Results At a minimum 2.9 years’ follow-up, statistically significant differences were seen with respect to the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) score and range of motion values. In group 1 (SLAP repair and rotator cuff repair), the UCLA showed a statistically significant improvement from a preoperative average rating of 10.4 (range, 6–14) to an average of 27.9 (range, 24–35) postoperatively ( P < .001). In group 2 (biceps tenotomy and rotator cuff repair), the UCLA showed a statistically significant improvement from a preoperative average rating of 10.1 (range, 5–14) to an average of 32.1 (range, 30–35) postoperatively ( P < .001) There was a statistically significant difference in total postoperative UCLA scores and range of motion when comparing the 2 groups postoperatively ( P < .05). Conclusions There are no advantages in repairing a type II SLAP lesion when associated with a rotator cuff tear in patients over 50 years of age. The association of rotator cuff repair and biceps tenotomy provides better clinical outcome compared with repair of the type II SLAP lesion and the rotator cuff.


2010 ◽  
Vol 26 (7) ◽  
pp. 1005-1008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sung-Hun Kim ◽  
Yong-Gon Koh ◽  
Chang-Hun Sung ◽  
Hong-Kyo Moon ◽  
Young-Sik Park

2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. e545-e550 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nata Parnes ◽  
Mario Ciani ◽  
Brian Carr ◽  
Paul Carey
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-41
Author(s):  
Sung Hyun Lee ◽  
Min Su Joo ◽  
Kyeong Hoon Lim ◽  
Jeong Woo Kim

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to evaluate results of superior labrum anterior to posterior (SLAP) repairs and debridement of type II SLAP lesions combined with Bankart lesions.METHODS: Between 2010 and 2014, total 58 patients with anterior shoulder instability due to a Bankart lesion combined with a type II SLAP lesion were enrolled. Patients were divided into two groups: group C consisted of 30 patients, each with a communicated Bankart and type II SLAP lesion and group NC consisted of 28 patients, each with a non-communicated Bankart and type II SLAP lesion. Bankart repairs were performed for all patients. SLAP lesions were repaired in group C and debrided in group NC. Clinical results were analysed to compare groups C and NC by using the visual analogue scale pain score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Constant scores, Rowe score for instability and range of motion assessments.RESULTS: The clinical scores were improved in both groups at final follow-up. Also, there were no differences between two groups. No significant difference was found in terms of the range of motion measured at the last follow-up. The number of suture anchors used was significantly higher in group C than in group NC (5.6 vs. 3.8; p=0.021).CONCLUSIONS: In this study, it is considered that Bankart repair and SLAP debridement could be a treatment option in patients with a non-communicated type II SLAP lesion combined with a Bankart lesion (study design: IV, therapeutic study, case series).


2011 ◽  
Vol 60 (4) ◽  
pp. 645-648
Author(s):  
Katsunori Yazawa ◽  
Junji Ide ◽  
Hiroshi Mizuta

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document