Pathology and surgical outcomes of anterior traumatic shoulder instability in gymnasts (235)

Objectives: For shoulders of artistic gymnasts, stability against various forces such as weight bearing, torsion, and traction is required as well as wide range of motion. The prevalence of shoulder instability in gymnasts has been reported to be high, particularly in female gymnasts; however, there has been no report on its pathology and the surgical outcomes. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively investigate the pathology and surgical outcomes of anterior traumatic shoulder instability in gymnasts. Methods: The subjects of this study were 18 shoulders of 16 gymnasts that underwent arthroscopic surgery for anterior traumatic shoulder instability. They consisted of 4 male and 14 female shoulders with a mean age of 18 years (range, 16-20). The mean follow-up was 30 months (range, 10-66 months). All surgeries were performed arthroscopically, and procedures were determined according to the intraoperative findings. Patients were immobilized with a brace for 3 weeks and started range of motion exercise after the immobilization period. Hand-stand or hanging were normally allowed at 3 month after surgery according to patients’ functional recovery. We investigated injury mechanism, intraoperative findings, surgical procedures, times to start hand-stand or hanging and to start giant swing, time to complete return to gymnastics, and recurrence of instability. Results: Three shoulders experienced dislocations that self-reduction was impossible. The remaining 15 shoulders had self-reducible dislocations or subluxations, and 10 of 15 shoulders were injured with the shoulder hyper-flexed: e.g., pulling up hands during somersaults; pushing off the vault (Figure). Bankart lesion was identified during surgery in 14 shoulders including one bony Bankart lesion. Capsular tear was found in 5 shoulders, and only one lesion was concomitant with Bankart lesion. All lesions were arthroscopically repaired. We additionally performed rotator interval closure in 10 shoulders, superior labrum repair in 13, and rotator cuff repair in 2. One patient retired from gymnastics immediately after surgery, and 2 patients were lost to follow-up. The remaining 13 patients returned to gymnastics. The mean time to start hand-stand or hanging was 4 months (range, 3-10 months), and that to start giant swing was 6 months (range, 3-15 months). The mean time to complete return was 9 months (range, 5-17 months). Two shoulders experienced recurrence (1 dislocation and 1 subluxation) after return to gymnastics. Both shoulders underwent revision surgery and returned to gymnastics. Conclusions: Capsular tear without Bankart lesion was more common (4 shoulder, 22%) in gymnasts than general population. The sport-related characteristics might be associated with the high incidence of capsular tear. The outcomes of arthroscopic stabilization for gymnasts was good with the high complete return rate.

Pathology and clinical outcomes after arthroscopic stabilization in shoulders with traumatic anterior instability older than 40 years: Comparison between shoulders with the first dislocation before or after 40 years (241)

Objectives: Traumatic anterior shoulder instability is common in young population but sometimes seen in middle-aged and elderly patients. The higher incidence of rotator cuff tears has been reported in middle-aged and elderly patients with anterior shoulder instability than young population. We, however, had an impression through clinical experiences that the pathology, including the incidence of rotator cuff tears, might be different by age at the first dislocation. There have been few articles that reported the pathology of shoulders with anterior shoulder instability in older population. The purpose of this study was to investigate pathology and clinical outcomes in patients who underwent arthroscopic stabilization at 40 years or older and to compare them between shoulders with the first dislocation before or after 40 years. Methods: The inclusion criteria of this study were as follows: 1) shoulders that underwent arthroscopic stabilization between October 2005 and September 2017, 2) traumatic anterior shoulder instability, and 3) 40 year old or older. The exclusion criterion was < 2-year follow-up. Glenoid morphology was evaluated with preoperative 3-dimensional computed tomography, and the size of glenoid bone defect was measured. Intraoperative findings, including rotator cuff tear, Bankart lesion, and humeral avulsion of the glenohumeral ligament (HAGL) lesion, and surgical procedures were investigated with surgical records. Range of motion was assessed preoperatively and at the final follow-up. Postoperative re-dislocation was also investigated. The subjects were divided into two groups according to the age at the first dislocation: Group 1, < 40 years; Group 2, 40 years or older. The findings and outcomes were compared between the two groups. The unpaired t-test was used to compare continuous data between the groups, and the paired t-test was used for pre- and postoperative comparison of continuous data. The chi-square test was used for categorical variables. The level of significance was set at p < 0.05. Results: Between October 2005 and September 2017, 198 shoulders (198 patients) underwent arthroscopic shoulder stabilization for traumatic anterior shoulder instability at 40 years or older. Fifty-six shoulders were excluded due to < 2-year follow-up, and 142 shoulders (142 patients) were included in this study. They consisted of 69 males and 73 females with a mean age of 51 (range, 40-78) years. The mean follow-up was 4 (range, 2-12) years. Group 1 included 105 shoulders (52 males and 53 females] with a mean age of 48 (range, 40-77) years. Group 2 included 37 shoulders (17 male and 20 females) with a mean age of 59 (range, 40-78) years. Group 1 had a longer time from the first dislocation to surgery (P<.001) and larger number of dislocation (P<.001) than Group 2 (Table 1). Bony Bankart lesion was more frequently seen in Group 2 than Group 1 (P=.02), and bone defect was greater in Group 1 than Group 2 (P=.02). The incidence of Bankart lesion or HAGL lesion was not significantly different between the groups. There were 2 full-thickness (1 small and 1 medium) and 16 joint-side partial-thickness rotator cuff tears in Group 1, while 16 full-thickness (4 small, 4 medium, 5 large, and 3 massive) and 8 joint-side partial-thickness tears were found in Group 2. The difference in the incidence of rotator cuff tears was significant between the groups (P<.001). Arthroscopic Bankart repair (ABR) with or without augmentation was performed in 103 shoulders (98 %) in Group 1 and in 35 shoulders (95%) in Group 2 (Table 2). There were 2 isolated HAGL repairs (2 %) in Group 1 and 2 isolated rotator cuff repairs (6 %) in Group 2. Two shoulders (6%) in Group 2 experienced re-dislocation. Forward flexion showed significant improvement from 159 (range, 100-180) to 170 (range, 140-180) degrees in Group 1 and from 148 (range, 40-180) to 163 (range, 70-180) degrees in Group 2 (P<.001 for each). Postoperative forward flexion showed no significant difference between the groups. External rotation showed no postoperative changes in both groups, while Group 1 had significantly better pre- and postoperative external rotation than Group 2. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that the incidence of rotator cuff tears was much higher in shoulders with the first dislocation after 40 years compared to shoulders with the first dislocation before 40 years. Shoulders with the first dislocation before 40 years had larger glenoid bone loss, while 51% of shoulders with the first dislocation after 40 years retained bony fragments. The longer time from the initial injury to surgery might be associated with the larger glenoid bone loss and absorption of bone fragments. Both groups showed satisfactory outcomes with the low rate of complications.

“Double-Pulley” Dual-Row Technique for Arthroscopic Fixation of Large Bony Bankart Lesion: Minimum 2-Year Follow-up With CT Evaluation

Background: A “double-pulley” dual-row technique had been applied for arthroscopic fixation of large bony Bankart lesion in which the fragment has a wide base. Purpose: To investigate clinical outcomes and glenoid healing after arthroscopic fixation of bony Bankart lesion using the double-pulley dual-row technique. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A total of 25 patients were included in this retrospective study. The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, pain visual analog scale (VAS) score, and range of motion of the affected shoulder were assessed. Radiographs and computed tomography (CT) scans (preoperatively, immediately after surgery, and at 1 year postoperatively) were performed to evaluate arthritic changes (Samilson-Prieto classification) and glenoid size. The intraobserver reliability of the CT measurements was analyzed. Results: At a mean follow-up of 3.4 years, the mean ASES and VAS scores were 94.87 ± 5.02 and 0.48 ± 0.59, respectively. Active forward elevation, external rotation with the arm at the side, and internal rotation were 165.80° ± 11.70°, 33.20° ± 8.02°, and T9 (range, T6-S1), respectively. No patient reported a history of redislocation or instability. The intraobserver reliability of the CT measurements was moderate to excellent. The mean preoperative size of the bony fragment was measured as 23.4% ± 7.8% of the glenoid articular surface. The quality of the reduction was judged to be excellent in 13 (52%) cases, good in 8 (32%), and fair in 4 (16%). The mean immediate postoperative glenoid size was 96.8% ± 4.3%, and bone union was found in all cases. There were no significant differences between reconstructed and immediate postoperative glenoid size or between preoperative and final Samilson-Prieto grades. Conclusion: The arthroscopic double-pulley method was a reliable technique for the fixation of large bony Bankart lesions with a wide base. Satisfactory results can be expected regarding the restoration of the glenoid morphology and stability of the shoulder. High healing rate and good shoulder function can be achieved. No radiological evidence of cartilage damage caused by suture abrasion was found at 2- to 5-year follow-up.

Arthroscopic Repair of the Bankart Lesion Using Dual-Row Labral Repair

Background: The most common technique described for bankart repair is the single-row labral repair. Recent interest has been the use of a dual-row, double pulley technique, first described by Zhang et al and popularized by Millett et al as the “bony Bankart bridge” technique. The aim of this study is to report a double-row all-suture labral fixation technique using knotless anchors. Technique: Step 1: glenohumeral debridement, and preparation of the glenoid labral and Bankart. The patient is first placed in the beach-chair position and surface landmarks are created. The standard posterior portal is first created and the glenohumeral joint is evaluated. Once the lesion is identified, the relevant working anterosuperior and anteroinferior portals are established using the outside-in technique. The synovitis is debrided to allow visualization and the labrum is liberated from the anterior glenoid. The Bankart lesion fragment is liberated, and partial fragments are osteotomized. With the anterolateral portal as the viewing portal, the anterior rim of the glenoid is now decorticated using a motorized shaver and rasp to create a bleeding bony surface. Step 2: the low rim anchor (5:30 o’clock). At the anterior-inferior aspect of the glenoid, the drill guide is positioned as low as possible (5:30 o’clock position for the right shoulder) and about 7 to 10 mm medial to the rim of the glenoid. The first 1.8 mm single-loaded suture anchor (Q-FIX All-Suture Anchor) is then inserted via the posterior portal. Step 3: the anterior-inferior-medial (AIM) anchor (4 o’clock). Step 4: the knotless high rim anchor (3 o’clock). Step 5: tying of sutures. The sutures from each anchor are tied in a mattress configuration, eventually creating a suture bridge over the labral repair Discussion/Conclusion: This dual row labral repair technique allows for maximum compression and contact between the fragment and the glenoid bed, allowing healing over a contact area rather than just the rim. The other added advantage is the use of curved tip anchors which allow negotiation of difficult corners, especially in the 5 to 6 o’clock position.

Bilateral Proximal Humerus Fracture with Anterior Shoulder Dislocation and Unilateral Chronic Bankart Lesion – A Case Report

Introduction: Anterior shoulder dislocation is a common presentation in orthopedic emergency but a bilateral fracture dislocation is a rare entity. Only a few cases have been reported in the literature and their management is still not clear. We present a bilateral four part fracture dislocation with Bankart lesion on right side in a 48 years old. Case Report: A 48-year-old male presented with bilateral proximal humerus fracture with anterior shoulder dislocation following a seizure. He was managed with bilateral PHILOS and Latarjet procedure on right side for a chronic bony Bankart lesion. Superficial infection on left side was managed with debridement. After 1 year period patient had a satisfactory outcome with DASH score of 19.2. Conclusion: Bilateral four part proximal humerus fracture with shoulder dislocation is encountered rarely. Recurrent dislocations results in chronic glenoid bones loss which needs fixation along with fracture. Addressing both sides subsequently or in a single sitting is still debatable. Keywords: Bilateral humerus fracture, anterior dislocation, Bankart repair.

Labral lesions in first-time traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation: it’s more than just Bankart …

Introduction Traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation occurs frequently and usually affects young, active male patients. Detachment of the anteroinferior labrum, known as the Bankart lesion, is a common result. However, more extensive entities including bony lesions and disruptions of the labral ring can also be found. The aim of the present work was to analyze all cases of first-time traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation at a level‑1 trauma center with regard to the type of labral lesion. Focus was placed on the frequency and distribution of complex lesions and the extent of the surgical repair. Patients and methods The clinical database of a level‑1 trauma center with a specialized shoulder unit was searched to identify all patients with first-time anterior shoulder dislocation treated between 2015 and 2019. Of 224 patients, 110 underwent primary surgical repair after first-time dislocation (mean age 40 years). Results A total of 62% of patients had only a soft tissue injury, while 38% (n = 40) showed a bony Bankart lesion/fracture of the glenoid fossa with a mean defect size of 26%. In only 31% of patients (n = 34), a classic Bankart repair was performed, whereas the remaining 69% underwent additional procedures. Conclusion In this series of surgically treated first-time traumatic anterior shoulder dislocations, the majority of cases presented with more complex lesions than an isolated classic Bankart lesion. The risk for bony involvement and associated pathologies, such as cuff tears and greater tuberosity fracture, increases with age and requires a more extensive surgical approach. Disruption of the labral ring was frequently found in both soft tissue and bony lesions and directly affected the surgical procedure.