Family history of premature coronary artery disease is not associated with coronary artery calcification

2021 ◽  
Vol 331 ◽  
pp. e231
Author(s):  
G. Koulaouzidis ◽  
D. Charisopoulou
2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
G Koulaouzidis ◽  
D Charisopoulou

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background Controversy exists regarding the association of family history(FH) of premature coronary artery disease (CAD) with coronary artery calcification (CAC). The purpose of this study was to assess the potential association between family history of premature CAD (<55 years in first-degree male relatives and <65 years in first-degree female relatives) and CAC. Methods A retrospective study of 3613 asymptomatic individuals who underwent assessment of CAC score (CACs) according with the Agatston method. Individuals were selected based on the presence or absence of FH of premature CAD. Individuals with history of hypercholesterolaemia, hypertension, diabetes mellitus or obesity (BMI> 30), smokers (current or previous) were excluded. Furthermore, we excluded subjects with late-onset family history of CAD (>55 years in first-degree male relatives and >65 years in first-degree female relatives). Results Mean age of the cohort was 50.4 ± 9.5 year (74.6% males) and 15.6% reported FH in a parent, sibling or both (prevalence was 12.8% in parents only, 1.9% in siblings only and 0.9% in both parents and siblings). The prevalence of CAC was similar in individuals with FH (35%) and those without (36%), p = 0.2; with no difference in the mean CACs between the two groups, p = 0.4 (Table 1). Individuals with FH in parents only or siblings only had a similar incidence of CAC compared to those without FH (p = 0.9 and 0.7, respectively), with no difference in the mean CACs, p= 0.9 in both. Additionally, the incidence of CAC was not different in individuals with FH in both parents and siblings compared to those without FH (p= 0.1) and again there was no difference in the mean CACs (p = 0.6). Conclusion In asymptomatic individuals with none of the conventional risk factors for atherosclerosis, there was no relationship between the incidence and extent of CAC and the presence of FH of premature CAD. CAC distribution based on FH of CAD No FH Yes FH FH in parents only FH in siblings FH in both Number 3047 566 464 68 34 Males 74.8% 73.3% 74.3% 69.1% 67.7% Age (mean ± SD) 52 ± 9.6 46.9 ± 8.2 46.6 ± 8.1 49.5 ± 8.4 47.3 ± 8.2 Prevalence of CAC 35% 36% 35.2% 36.7% 41% Log-transformed CACs (± SD) 0.5 ± 0.8 0.5 ± 0.8 0.5 ± 0.8 0.5 ± 0.8 0.7 ± 0.9


2016 ◽  
Vol 117 (3) ◽  
pp. 353-358 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed Abdi-Ali ◽  
AbdelAziz Shaheen ◽  
Danielle Southern ◽  
Mei Zhang ◽  
Merril Knudtson ◽  
...  

10.2223/1153 ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 80 (2) ◽  
pp. 135-140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ceres C. Romaldini ◽  
Hugo Issler ◽  
Ary L. Cardoso ◽  
Jayme Diament ◽  
Neusa Forti

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 134-149
Author(s):  
Hamat Hamdi Che Hassan ◽  

Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) events can be accelerated by positive family history of young coronary artery disease (CAD). Risk factors assessment sometimes fail to predict ACS occurrence. Additional investigations with coronary artery calcium (CAC) score can be used independently in screening for primary prevention in some population. This was a cross-sectional study in asymptomatic population with first degree relatives (FDR) having premature CAD compared with a matched population with no family history of CAD from September 2017 to March 2018 at the Cardiology Clinic of Univeristi Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre. A total of 36 subjects were recruited with equal number in each group. Female were the majority in each group (66.7%). The FDR group were slightly younger compared to the control group [mean (SD) age 36.9 (4.9) against 38 (3.8), respectively). Both groups represent high risk factors including overweight and obesity, abdominal obesity as well as dyslipidemia. Newly diagnosed dyslipidemia was significant in the group with family history (83.3% versus 44.4%, P<0.01). Both groups were screened either into the low or moderate risk Framingham Risk Score group. CAC score was higher in family history group (11.1% vs 0%, P>0.05). In conclusion, CAC may be irrelevant for screening in younger population. However, the yield of other risk factor is still alarming.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. e0215302 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tadeusz Osadnik ◽  
Natalia Pawlas ◽  
Kamila Osadnik ◽  
Kamil Bujak ◽  
Marta Góral ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document