scholarly journals Effect of COVID-19 on management of patients with low back pain in the emergency department

Author(s):  
Sweekriti Sharma ◽  
Adrian C. Traeger ◽  
Gustavo C. Machado ◽  
Christina Abdel Shaheed ◽  
Caitlin Jones ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 70-77
Author(s):  
Larissa Faria Borges ◽  
Ligia Loiola Cisneros ◽  
Danielle Aquino Silva ◽  
Amabile Borges Dario ◽  
Manuela Ferreira ◽  
...  

Objective: To describe the demographic profile and the management of patients with low back pain (LBP) complaints presenting to the Emergency Department (ED) of a Brazilian public hospital. Methods: Retrospective, cross-sectional study using a convenience sample of patients with LBP triaged at the studied ED through the Manchester Triage System along a year. Data were extracted from electronic medical records. LBP presentations were classified as non-traumatic, traumatic, and non-spinal related pain according to the signs and symptoms reported. Data included patients’ demographic profile, pain severity and management (e.g., imaging exams, medication prescription and hospitalization). Results: Data from 2016 patients was analyzed. Most were middle-aged adults (mean age = 40.5years, SD 15.7), female (n = 1043, 51.7%) and presented moderate pain intensity (score range 4 to 7 on the Visual Analogue Scale, n=1,471; 74.1%). Non-traumatic pain (n = 1,016; 50.4%) was the main cause of care-seeking. A total of 36.9% (n = 743) underwent imaging exams and 42.2% (n = 850) received medication. Patients with non-spinal related pain were three times more likely to receive opioid medication (OR = 2.96; 95%CI 2.30 to 3.79). Conclusion: Non-traumatic LBP (i.e., no history of trauma or red flags) was the main cause of LBP care-seeking in a Brazilian ED. Most patients were treated conservatively and without hospitalization. Opioids prescription and imaging exams, although performed on a smaller scale, were still used for of the management of this type of LBP.


2018 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 437-438 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kirsten Strudwick ◽  
Megan McPhee ◽  
Anthony Bell ◽  
Melinda Martin-Khan ◽  
Trevor Russell

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (10) ◽  
pp. 1138-1145 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin W. Friedman ◽  
John Conway ◽  
Caron Campbell ◽  
Polly E. Bijur ◽  
E. John Gallagher

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 672-679 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Saverio Biagiarelli ◽  
Simone Piga ◽  
Antonino Reale ◽  
Pasquale Parisi ◽  
Marta Luisa Ciofi degli Atti ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander J Anshus ◽  
Jessica Oswald

Aim: To evaluate pain and length of stay outcomes in six patients who received an erector spinae plane block (ESPB) in the emergency department (ED) for low back pain. Materials & methods: A case series of six patients who received unilateral or bilateral ESPB after presenting to the ED for acute atraumatic axial low back pain. Results: The average visual analog scale pain score reduction was 81.8%, and length of stay after ESPB was 73.5 min. No postprocedure opiates in the ED or after discharge were required. Conclusion: The ESPB is a rapid, safe and opiate-sparing option for the treatment of acute low back pain.


Author(s):  
Adrian Traeger ◽  
Gustavo C Machado ◽  
Sally Bath ◽  
Martin Tran ◽  
Lucinda Roper ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Background Imaging for low back pain is widely regarded as a target for efforts to reduce low value care. We aimed to estimate the prevalence of overuse and underuse of lumbar imaging in the Emergency Department. Methods Retrospective chart review study of five public hospital Emergency Departments in Sydney, Australia, in 2019/20. We reviewed the clinical charts of consecutive adult patients who presented with a complaint of low back pain and extracted clinical features relevant to a decision to request lumbar imaging. We estimated the proportion of encounters where a decision to request lumbar imaging was inappropriate (overuse) or where a clinician did not request an appropriate and informative lumbar imaging test when indicated (underuse). Results 649 patients presented with a complaint of low back pain of which 158 (24.3%) were referred for imaging. 79 (12.2%) had a combination of features suggesting lumbar imaging was indicated according to clinical guidelines. The prevalence of overuse and underuse of lumbar imaging was 8.8% (57 of 649 cases, 95%CI 6.8% to 11.2%) and 4.3% (28 of 649 cases, 95%CI 3.0% to 6.1%), respectively. 13 cases were classified as underuse because the patient was referred for an uninformative imaging modality (e.g. referred for radiography for suspected cauda equina syndrome). Conclusion In this study of emergency care there was evidence of overuse of lumbar imaging, but also underuse through failure to request lumbar imaging when indicated or referral for an uninformative imaging modality. These three issues seem more important targets for quality improvement than solely focusing on overuse.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document