A comparison of Lewis and Fischer rat strains on autoshaping (sign-tracking), discrimination reversal learning and negative automaintenance

2006 ◽  
Vol 169 (2) ◽  
pp. 193-200 ◽  
Author(s):  
David N. Kearns ◽  
Maria A. Gomez-Serrano ◽  
Stanley J. Weiss ◽  
Anthony L. Riley

1961 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 227-232 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. J. Capaldi ◽  
Monte G. Senko






1965 ◽  
Vol 2 (1-12) ◽  
pp. 139-140 ◽  
Author(s):  
William N. Boyer ◽  
Henry A. Cross


2008 ◽  
Vol 58 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J. Beran ◽  
Emily D. Klein ◽  
Theodore A. Evans ◽  
Betty Chan ◽  
Timothy M. Flemming ◽  
...  


1970 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 239-245 ◽  
Author(s):  
Merrill F. Elias

Spatial discrimination reversal learning was explored for mice genetically selected for high brain weight and unselected controls with lower brain weights. Control-line Ss escaped from a water maze more rapidly, but high-line Ss made fewer errors and took less trials to reach criterion on the first reversal. Control-line Ss were unable to complete more than 1 reversal, while high-line Ss all completed at least 7 reversals. This positive relation between reversal learning and brain size is consistent with comparisons among species and experiments manipulating brain size by means of drugs or surgery.



1973 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 52-56 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. M. Warren ◽  
Helen B. Warren


1976 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 133-150 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keith M. Jonson ◽  
Jack G. Lyle ◽  
Marshall J. Edwards ◽  
Richard H.C. Penny


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document