Visual discrimination learning in zebrafish (Danio rerio)

2005 ◽  
Vol 70 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruth M. Colwill ◽  
Maria P. Raymond ◽  
Lisa Ferreira ◽  
Holly Escudero
1971 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 187-188 ◽  
Author(s):  
Don White ◽  
Paul Spong ◽  
Norm Cameron ◽  
John Bradford

1971 ◽  
Vol 85 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean N. Nazzaro ◽  
Rachel Rodrigues ◽  
James R. Nazzaro

1998 ◽  
Vol 19 (5) ◽  
pp. 415-425 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Head ◽  
H. Callahan ◽  
B.A. Muggenburg ◽  
C.W. Cotman ◽  
N.W. Milgram

2018 ◽  
Vol 148 ◽  
pp. 37-48
Author(s):  
Rodrigo Montefusco-Siegmund ◽  
Mauricio Toro ◽  
Pedro E. Maldonado ◽  
María de la L. Aylwin

1981 ◽  
Vol 33 (3b) ◽  
pp. 141-157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Dean ◽  
Sian G. Pope

It has been suggested that, for some species, lesions of the superior colliculus affect visual discrimination learning, but only in certain conditions: (a) when problems are first learnt only after operation, or (b) when discriminanda require detailed scanning, or (c) when “approach” responses to the discriminanda are measured, rather than the response of actually touching them. These suggestions were examined in rats learning visual discriminations in a modified jumping-stand apparatus, after sustaining large lesions of the superior colliculus (and in some cases also of the pretectum). The lesions produced open-field hyperactivity and reduced exploration, indicating effective tectal damage, but the rats learnt a series of difficult discriminations in a door-push task as fast as normal rats, and they did not make more approach errors. Their main abnormality in the discrimination apparatus was that they looked less often between the stimulus doors before stepping across to one of them from the central platform. It is suggested that in rats, as in other animals, lesions of the superior colliculus disrupt the control of scanning head and eye movements; in rats, however, such disruption need not affect discrimination learning (at least in some kinds of apparatus), possibly because the retina of the rat has a relatively poorly developed area centralis.


2003 ◽  
Vol 89 (2) ◽  
pp. 1161-1164 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. A. Hadland ◽  
M.F.S. Rushworth ◽  
D. Gaffan ◽  
R. E. Passingham

Macaques were taught a reward-conditional response selection task; they learned to associate each of two different actions to each of two different rewards and to select actions that were appropriate for particular rewards. They were also taught a visual discrimination learning task. Cingulate lesions significantly impaired selection of responses associated with different rewards but did not interfere with visual discrimination learning or performance. The results suggest that 1) the cingulate cortex is concerned with action reward associations and not limited to just detecting when actions lead to errors and 2) that the cingulate cortex's function is limited to action reinforcer associations and it is not concerned with stimulus reward associations.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document