What counts for dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) in a quantity discrimination task?

2016 ◽  
Vol 122 ◽  
pp. 90-97 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Elena Miletto Petrazzini ◽  
Clive D.L. Wynne
2015 ◽  
Vol 129 (3) ◽  
pp. 237-246 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathaniel J. Hall ◽  
Kelsey Glenn ◽  
David W. Smith ◽  
Clive D. L. Wynne

Animals ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 2304
Author(s):  
Miina Lõoke ◽  
Lieta Marinelli ◽  
Carla Jade Eatherington ◽  
Christian Agrillo ◽  
Paolo Mongillo

Recent studies have showed that domestic dogs are only scantly susceptible to visual illusions, suggesting that the perceptual mechanisms might be different in humans and dogs. However, to date, none of these studies have utilized illusions that are linked to quantity discrimination. In the current study, we tested whether dogs are susceptible to a linear version of the Solitaire illusion, a robust numerosity illusion experienced by most humans. In the first experiment, we tested dogs’ ability to discriminate items in a 0.67 and 0.75 numerical ratio. The results showed that dogs’ quantity discrimination abilities fall in between these two ratios. In Experiment 2, we presented the dogs with the Solitaire illusion pattern using a spontaneous procedure. No evidence supporting any numerosity misperception was found. This conclusion was replicated in Experiment 3, where we manipulated dogs’ initial experience with the stimuli and their contrast with the background. The lack of dogs’ susceptibility to the Solitaire illusion suggests that numerical estimation of dogs is not influenced by the spatial arrangement of the items to be enumerated. In view of the existing evidence, the effect may be extended to dogs’ quantitative abilities at large.


2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 703-710 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Elena Miletto Petrazzini ◽  
Fabio Mantese ◽  
Emanuela Prato-Previde

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ines Pedro Perpetuo ◽  
Richard Meeson ◽  
Andrew Pitsillides ◽  
Michael Doube ◽  
Isabel Orriss

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernardo Lartigau ◽  
Gustavo Aprile ◽  
Mart�n Monteverde ◽  
Mario Santos Beade ◽  
Juan Manuel Lartigau ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 427-434 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Elena Miletto Petrazzini ◽  
Angelo Bisazza ◽  
Christian Agrillo

2013 ◽  
Vol 25 (8) ◽  
pp. 1142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Insung Hwang ◽  
Yeon Woo Jeong ◽  
Joung Joo Kim ◽  
Hyo Jeong Lee ◽  
Mina Kang ◽  
...  

Interspecies somatic cell nuclear transfer (iSCNT) is an emerging assisted reproductive technology (ART) for preserving Nature’s diversity. The scarcity of oocytes from some species makes utilisation of readily available oocytes inevitable. In the present study, we describe the successful cloning of coyotes (Canis latrans) through iSCNT using oocytes from domestic dogs (Canis lupus familiaris or dingo). Transfer of 320 interspecies-reconstructed embryos into 22 domestic dog recipients resulted in six pregnancies, from which eight viable offspring were delivered. Fusion rate and cloning efficiency during iSCNT cloning of coyotes were not significantly different from those observed during intraspecies cloning of domestic dogs. Using neonatal fibroblasts as donor cells significantly improved the cloning efficiency compared with cloning using adult fibroblast donor cells (P < 0.05). The use of domestic dog oocytes in the cloning of coyotes in the present study holds promise for cloning other endangered species in the Canidae family using similar techniques. However, there are still limitations of the iSCNT technology, as demonstrated by births of morphologically abnormal coyotes and the clones’ inheritance of maternal domestic dog mitochondrial DNA.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document