Particle motion and sound pressure in fish tanks: A behavioural exploration of acoustic sensitivity in the zebrafish

2019 ◽  
Vol 164 ◽  
pp. 38-47 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Campbell ◽  
Saeed Shafiei Sabet ◽  
Hans Slabbekoorn
2018 ◽  
Vol 143 (3) ◽  
pp. 1712-1712
Author(s):  
Christine Erbe ◽  
Miles Parsons ◽  
Alec J. Duncan ◽  
Klaus Lucke ◽  
Alexander Gavrilov ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Wakae Kozukue ◽  
Chinmoy Pal ◽  
Ichiro Hagiwara

Abstract A method for evaluating simultaneous optimization of a number of strucural/acoustic responses of a coupled strutural-acoustic problem is presented in this paper. Different and mutually conflicting criteria, the strucural response and sound pressure level etc., are taken as objective functions. The general inverse problem is solved to find out the required minimum change of plate thickness which is taken as design variable to satisfy/achieve the target values of the objective functions.


2016 ◽  
Vol 74 (3) ◽  
pp. 635-651 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony D. Hawkins ◽  
Arthur N. Popper

Increasing attention is being paid to the ecological consequences of underwater noise generated by human activities such as shipping and maritime industries including, but not limited to, oil and gas exploration and extraction, sonar systems, dredging and the construction of offshore renewable energy devices. There is particular concern over the extension of these activities into previously undeveloped areas of the oceans, including Polar Regions and areas of coral reef habitat. Most of the concern by regulators and others has focussed upon effects upon marine mammals and other protected species. However, examining the impacts upon the overall ecology of affected habitats is also important as it may be dominated by effects upon the far larger biomasses of fishes and invertebrates, which do not have the same degree of legal protection. Many of these assessments of the impact of noise on fishes and invertebrates have overlooked important issues, including the sensitivity of a substantial proportion of these species to particle motion rather than sound pressure. Attempts have been made to establish sound exposure criteria setting regulatory limits to the levels of noise in terms of effects upon mortality levels, injury to tissues, hearing abilities, behaviour, and physiology. However, such criteria have almost exclusively been developed for marine mammals. Criteria for fishes and invertebrates have often had to be assumed, or they have been derived from poorly designed and controlled studies. Moreover, the metrics employed to describe sounds from different sources have often been inappropriate, especially for fishes, and invertebrates, as they have been based on sound pressure rather than particle motion. In addition, the sound propagation models employed to assess the distances over which effects might occur have seldom been validated by actual measurements and are especially poor at dealing with transmission under shallow water conditions, close to or within the seabed, or at the surface. Finally, impacts on fish and invertebrate populations are often unknown and remain unassessed. This paper considers the problems of assessing the impact of noise upon fishes and invertebrates and the assessment procedures that need to be implemented to protect these animals and the marine ecosystems of which they form an integral part. The paper also suggests directions for future research and planning that, if implemented, will provide for a far better scientific and regulatory basis for dealing with effects of noise on aquatic life.


2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marta Solé ◽  
Peter Sigray ◽  
Marc Lenoir ◽  
Mike van der Schaar ◽  
Emilia Lalander ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erwin Jansen ◽  
Mark Prior ◽  
Eef Brouns

2013 ◽  
Vol 63 (2) ◽  
pp. 199-215 ◽  
Author(s):  
Franklin Bretschneider ◽  
Herman van Veen ◽  
Peter F.M. Teunis ◽  
Robert C. Peters ◽  
Albert V. van den Berg

In order to investigate the hearing capacities of adult zebrafish (Danio rerio), wild type zebrafish were conditioned to both sound pressure and particle motion in a respondent conditioning paradigm. Sound fields were generated by five underwater loudspeakers in a cylindrical tank, which allows separate control of sound pressure and particle motion. Sound stimuli were soft-switched sound pulses having a strength (RMS) of 0.4 to 5 Pa sound pressure (112 to 134 dB re 1 μPa), 6.7 × 10−7 to 6.7 × 10−6 m/s particle velocity or a combination thereof. Frequencies used were 800 Hz or 250 Hz. During the test a fish was placed in the acoustic centre of the tank, confined in a soft nylon mesh fitted with two silver chloride recording electrodes to measure both changes in position and the ventilatory response. Each sound presentation was followed by a brief mechanical jerk of the fish cage (unconditioned stimulus). The startling response to the unconditioned stimulus was thus coupled to the sound signal (conditioned stimulus). Responses were scored as changes in fish position and/or ventilatory rhythm, occurring during or after the sound pulses, but before the unconditioned stimulus. In this way, we found that wildtype zebrafish respond to artificial sounds having either predominantly sound pressure or particle motion. Discrimination of directionally different sounds could not be established. The method is suited well to probe other auditory capabilities, and to test zebrafish mutants lacking one or more otoliths.


2008 ◽  
Vol 99 (2) ◽  
pp. 107-119 ◽  
Author(s):  
E.J. Tuck ◽  
J.F.C. Windmill ◽  
D. Robert

AbstractTympanal hearing organs are widely used by insects to detect sound pressure. Such ears are relatively uncommon in the order Diptera, having only been reported in two families thus far. This study describes the general anatomical organization and experimentally examines the mechanical resonant properties of an unusual membranous structure situated on the ventral prothorax of the tsetse fly, Glossina morsitans (Diptera: Glossinidae). Anatomically, the prosternal membrane is backed by an air filled chamber and attaches to a pair of sensory chordotonal organs. Mechanically, the membrane shows a broad resonance around 5.3–7.2 kHz. Unlike previously reported dipteran tympana, a directional response to sound was not found in G. morsitans. Collectively, the morphology, the resonant properties and acoustic sensitivity of the tsetse prothorax are consistent with those of the tympanal hearing organs in Ormia sp. and Emblemasoma sp. (Tachinidae and Sarcophagidae). The production of sound by several species of tsetse flies has been repeatedly documented. Yet, clear behavioural evidence for acoustic behaviour is sparse and inconclusive. Together with sound production, the presence of an ear-like structure raises the enticing possibility of auditory communication in tsetse flies and renews interest in the sensory biology of these medically important insects.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document