Manipulation of parasitoid state influences host exploitation by Diadromus pulchellus Wesmael (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae)

2012 ◽  
Vol 63 (3) ◽  
pp. 264-269 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wade H. Jenner ◽  
Ulrich Kuhlmann ◽  
Naomi Cappuccino ◽  
Peter G. Mason
2017 ◽  
Vol 220 (21) ◽  
pp. 3955-3966 ◽  
Author(s):  
Romain P. Boisseau ◽  
H. Arthur Woods ◽  
Marlène Goubault

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 533
Author(s):  
Pilar Domingo-Calap ◽  
Lucas Mora-Quilis ◽  
Rafael Sanjuán

Despite their simplicity, viruses can display social-like interactions such as cooperation, communication, and cheating. Focusing on bacteriophages, here we review features including viral product sharing, cooperative evasion of antiviral defenses, prudent host exploitation, superinfection exclusion, and inter-phage peptide-mediated signaling. We argue that, in order to achieve a better understanding of these processes, their mechanisms of action need to be considered in the context of social evolution theory, paying special attention to key population-level factors such as genetic relatedness and spatial structure.


1989 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 1391-1398 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacques Auger ◽  
Chantal Lecomte ◽  
Jacky Paris ◽  
Eric Thibout

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles Baillie ◽  
Rachel L. Welicky ◽  
Kerry A. Hadfield ◽  
Nico J. Smit ◽  
Stefano Mariani ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Parasite attachment structures are critical traits that influence effective host exploitation and survival. Morphology of attachment structures can reinforce host specificity and niche specialisation, or even enable host switching. Therefore, it is important to understand the determinants of variation in attachment structures. Cymothoid isopods are striking ectoparasites of fishes that include the infamous ‘tongue-biters.’ They are known to parasitise hosts in one of four qualitatively distinct anatomical regions. Here, we quantify variation in cymothoid attachment structures — hook-like appendages called dactyli — and test whether differences in dactylus shape are correlated with parasite mode (where they attach), allometry, or both, using multivariate ordinary least squares regression. We also assess the influence of shared ancestry on shape using a molecular phylogeny to weight our models using phylogenetic generalised least squares regression. Results We find clear differences in shape between externally-attaching and internally-attaching cymothoids but also between anterior and posterior dactyli across various species with the same attachment mode. Allometric effects are significant for anterior but not posterior dactyli. Mouth-attaching species show greater shape variability than gill- and mouth-attaching species. We find no evidence that there are clade-specific patterns of association between parasite mode and dactylus shape. Conclusions Parasite mode appears to be the main driver of attachment morphology. This likely reflects several components of parasite ecology including feeding and functional demands of attachment in different microhabitats. Geometric morphometric approaches to the quantification of shape variation of simple structures is an effective tool that provides new insights into the evolvability of parasite attachment.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document