Modified aesthetic abdominoplasty approach in perforator free-flap breast reconstruction: Impact of drain free donor site on patient outcomes

2015 ◽  
Vol 68 (6) ◽  
pp. 800-809 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anita T. Mohan ◽  
Charalambos K. Rammos ◽  
Prakriti Gaba ◽  
John Schupbach ◽  
Whitney J. Goede ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Dimitra Kotsougiani-Fischer ◽  
Laura Sieber ◽  
Sebastian Fischer ◽  
Christoph Hirche ◽  
Spyridoula Maraka ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
pp. 781-794
Author(s):  
Maurice Y. Nahabedian

The deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) and muscle-sparing (MS) free transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flaps are arguably the most common flaps used for autologous breast reconstruction. The benefit of these flaps is that very little to no donor site muscle is harvested. The decision to use one or the other is occasionally made preoperatively based on body habitus but often intraoperatively based on the quality of the perforating vessels. The technical aspects of the operation are similar except for the actual dissection around the perforating vessels. Studies have demonstrated no significant differences in outcome when comparing the DIEP and MS free TRAM flaps.


2013 ◽  
Vol 132 (6) ◽  
pp. 1383-1391 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward I. Chang ◽  
Eric I. Chang ◽  
Miguel A. Soto-Miranda ◽  
Hong Zhang ◽  
Naveed Nosrati ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 135 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael N. Mirzabeigi ◽  
Anthony J. Wilson ◽  
John P. Fischer ◽  
Marten Basta ◽  
Suhail Kanchwala ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (07) ◽  
pp. 474-482
Author(s):  
Alberto Okada ◽  
Diego Pereira ◽  
Eduardo Montag ◽  
Marcelo Portocarrero ◽  
Carlos Felício ◽  
...  

Background Free flap breast reconstruction is a conventional procedure in many countries; however, microvascular compromise remains a devastating outcome. Given the morbidity of total necrosis, optimizing free flap salvage stands out as an important area for research, especially among surgeons to overcome the learning curve period and in resource constrained scenario such as community hospitals. To ensure free deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP)/superficial inferior epigastric artery (SIEA) flap breast reconstruction, the authors present a technique involving raising a hemiabdominal flap as a free flap, and banking the remaining flap to be utilized if needed in a subsequent procedure. Methods A retrospective review was performed on all free flap breast reconstructions. In this period, 84 patients (mean age: 50.1 ± 8 years) were included. Results In this study, 65.5% patients underwent immediate reconstruction, and 51.2% received DIEP reconstruction; 9.52% patients were returned to the operating room, and salvage reconstruction using the banked flap was performed in all patients. No differences were observed regarding early complications and age, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists status, diabetes, smoking history, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and type of flap used (p > 0.05). Hypertension was significantly associated with early complications (p < 0.05). Donor-site complications were associated with RT (p < 0.05). Conclusion The banked flap is a reliable method for ensuring DIEP/SIEA flap survival and should be considered in higher risk reconstructions and community hospitals. We believe that the present technique can be a good addition to the arsenal of plastic surgeons dealing with free flap breast reconstructions in selected patients.


2008 ◽  
Vol 121 (5) ◽  
pp. 1519-1526 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raj M. Vyas ◽  
Brian P. Dickinson ◽  
Jaco H. Fastekjian ◽  
James P. Watson ◽  
Andrew L. DaLio ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (01) ◽  
pp. 059-066 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rami Dibbs ◽  
Jeff Trost ◽  
Valerie DeGregorio ◽  
Shayan Izaddoost

AbstractFree tissue transfer serves as a modern workhorse for breast reconstruction. Advancements in microsurgical technique have allowed for the development of free flap procedures that produce an aesthetic breast while minimizing donor site morbidity. Here, the authors review the use of different free flap procedures for breast reconstruction with a focus on the preferred and most commonly used flap, the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap. Each flap has its advantages and drawbacks, and certain patient risk factors increase postoperative complications. Other techniques of breast reconstruction including pedicled flaps and adjunctive fat grafting are also briefly discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document