Risk of breast implant removal after one- versus two-stage breast reconstructive surgery

Author(s):  
C.I.J.M. Theunissen ◽  
R.M. Brohet ◽  
Y. Hu ◽  
J.H. van Uchelen ◽  
J.H.C. Mensen ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Elliot M Hirsch

Abstract There are limited studies in the plastic surgery literature that detail technical considerations in simultaneous breast implant removal and mastopexy procedures. These procedures are difficult, with significant potential for complications and poor cosmesis. The current plastic surgery literature describes a limited number of techniques that address these concerns, virtually all of which are variants of superior or superior medial pedicle vertical pattern mastopexy. This paper details a safe technique for simultaneous explantation and mastopexy with a novel open marking pattern and vertical bipedicle, which can restore breast cosmesis following implant removal. The study will briefly retrospectively review the results of a consecutive series of 86 patients who underwent this procedure from November 2018 to November 2019, with no incidence of partial or total nipple-areola complex necrosis. Thus, the technique is safe and allows the flexibility for intraoperative adjustments that are necessary for these procedures. A future study will conduct a more in-depth analysis of the results. Level of Evidence: 4


Author(s):  
Marwan H Abboud ◽  
Ayush K Kapila ◽  
Svetlana Bogaert ◽  
Nicolas M Abboud

Abstract Background An increasing number of women wish breast implant removal whilst maintaining an acceptable projection and form were possible. Objectives The authors propose a technique to remodel the breast after implant removal utilizing internal suture loops to project the breast, recruit abdominal and axillary tissue cranially and medially, and provide a matrix for lipofilling. Methods A prospective analysis was performed of consecutive patients undergoing implant extraction followed by power-assisted liposuction loops and lipofilling. Patient characteristics were measured. The aesthetic results were evaluated by 2 independent raters. Patient-reported satisfaction was measured by standardized questionnaires. Results Implants in 52 patients with an average age of 55 and body mass index of 23.7 were extracted followed by breast remodeling. A total of 73% of patients had implants for aesthetic reasons, 41% were smokers, and 43% of the reconstruction cases received radiotherapy. A total of 28% had implant extraction for rupture, 58% for capsular contracture, and 14% due to pain and migration. The average volume of the implants removed was 292 cc, followed by an average lipofilling of 223 cc, yielding a ratio of 0.76 to 1. The average tissue recruited by loops was 82.5 cc. Independent raters measured 79% of results as good, 13% as acceptable, and 8% as requiring improvement; 80% of patients were satisfied to very satisfied. Conclusions The authors propose implant extraction followed by power-assisted liposuction loops and lipofilling can provide footprint definition, sustained projection, and high patient satisfaction. Moreover, the recruitment of a vascularized adipo-cutaneous flap by loops allows a reduced ratio of fat grafting to implant volume. Level of Evidence: 4


Author(s):  
Joanne S.K. Teh ◽  
Amalie E. Wilke ◽  
Simon M. Overstall ◽  
Jasmine C. Teng ◽  
Ruth Chin ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
G Karagiannidis ◽  
E Mallidis

Abstract Introduction Peri-implant fluid more than 6 months from surgery is a known complication of breast surgery.Differential diagnosis includes infection, inflammation,implant rupture and haematoma.Other than infection raised no concern until the identification of Breast Implant Associated Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma(BIA-ALCL). Method Retrospective electronic data collection for women 18 years or older who met the following inclusion criteria:(a)oncoplastic and/or cosmetic reconstructive surgery with placement of implant(b)peri-implant fluid collection after 6-36 months. Results In total,17 women with implants with a mean age of 56 years were included in the study.The mean time between reconstructive surgery and the peri-implant fluid collection was 23 months.The median peri-implant fluid collection size was 143 ml.14 of the 17 peri-implant fluid collections were benign.12 of 14 had polyurethane-coated textured implants.4 of the 17 were BIA-ALCL. Conclusions The current literature suggests that late peri-implant seromas arise from friction as the implant moves within the cavity and that this friction is increased with textured rather than smooth implants.In our unit 12/14 of the benign collections appeared in reconstructions with polyurethane implants.Furthermore,BIA-ALCL should always be considered in this situation and aspirate should be sent for cytology.Is this change in polyurethane implants a new entity?


2019 ◽  
Vol 74 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
N.D. Thimmappa ◽  
J.V. Vasile ◽  
C.Y. Ahn ◽  
J.L. Levine ◽  
M.R. Prince

2012 ◽  
Vol 48 ◽  
pp. S177 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Kiechle ◽  
E. Klein ◽  
D. Paepke ◽  
H. Bronger ◽  
J. Ettl ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (11) ◽  
pp. 1753-1756
Author(s):  
Paulina R. Skaff ◽  
Bridget S. Phillips ◽  
John H. Lobban ◽  
Christopher M. Bianco

1991 ◽  
Vol 87 (4) ◽  
pp. 785-787
Author(s):  
Franco Marconi ◽  
Mario Marra ◽  
Alberto Boni

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document