Gender roles, eating pathology, and body dissatisfaction in men: A meta-analysis

Body Image ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aaron J. Blashill
2017 ◽  
Vol 143 (3) ◽  
pp. 293-320 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bryan T. Karazsia ◽  
Sarah K. Murnen ◽  
Tracy L. Tylka

2016 ◽  
Vol 49 (5) ◽  
pp. 439-454 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francis Puccio ◽  
Matthew Fuller-Tyszkiewicz ◽  
Deborah Ong ◽  
Isabel Krug

Obesity Facts ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 424-441 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natascha-Alexandra Weinberger ◽  
Anette Kersting ◽  
Steffi G. Riedel-Heller ◽  
Claudia Luck-Sikorski

1994 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 451-462 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janet Shibley Hyde

Meta-analysis is a statistical method for literature reviewing. Metaanalyses of gender differences in verbal ability, spatial ability, mathematics performance, helping behavior, and sexuality illustrate the ways in which this technique can illuminate research on gender differences. Meta-analysis can make feminist transformations in psychology by: (a) challenging long-standing beliefs in gender differences, (b) demonstrating the extent to which gendered behavior is context-dependent and the product of gender roles, (c) examining the intersection between gender and race/ethnicity, and (d) providing powerful data to counter assertions of difference and female inferiority that proliferate in the popular media.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Victor Pollet ◽  
Sarah Dawson ◽  
Martin Tovee ◽  
Piers Cornelissen ◽  
Katri Cornelissen

Verbal denigration of personal body size and shape (“fat talk”) and engagement in social comparison has been linked to the development of body dissatisfaction and eating disordered behaviour. A key question is whether the relationship between these two predictors is additive or multiplicative, as the latter relationship would imply a far more serious impact on body dissatisfaction. A previous report has suggested a multiplicative relationship, and in two separate studies we replicated this study. In each study, female participants filled in fat talk, social comparison and body dissatisfaction measures. In the first study, 189 UK participants took part and in the second study, 371 US participants took part. Both studies found significant correlations between all three measures but no interaction effect, consistent with an additive not a multiplicative relationship. In a further test, we used a mini meta-analysis to combine the results of the two studies reported here with the results of the original study. Again, we found no evidence of an interaction. In conclusion, these studies show an additive relationship between fat talk and social comparison, suggesting their impact on body image is serious but not as serious as previously reported.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document