Post-Implant Visualization of the Prostate Brachytherapy Seeds and Calcifications Using Quantitative MR Techniques: T2, T2* and PD Mapping

Brachytherapy ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
pp. S183
Author(s):  
Reyhaneh Nosrati ◽  
Abraam Soliman ◽  
Nilesh Ghugre ◽  
Amir Owrangi ◽  
Shahram Mashouf ◽  
...  
2007 ◽  
Vol 177 (4S) ◽  
pp. 187-187
Author(s):  
Erin P. Gibbons ◽  
Ryan P. Smith ◽  
Sushil Beriwal ◽  
Komanduri Krishna ◽  
Ronald M. Benoit

2007 ◽  
Vol 177 (4S) ◽  
pp. 586-586
Author(s):  
Nelson N. Stone ◽  
Louis Potters ◽  
Brian J. Davis ◽  
Jay P. Ciezki ◽  
Michael J. Zelefsky ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (02) ◽  
pp. 132-142
Author(s):  
Klaus Engelke ◽  
Oliver Chaudry ◽  
Armin Nagel
Keyword(s):  

ZusammenfassungDieser Beitrag gibt einen Überblick über Magnetresonanztomographie-basierte (MRT-basierte) Methoden zur Quantifizierung der Muskeldegeneration. Neben Muskelvolumen kann mit Dixon-Bildgebung insbesondere der prozentuale Fettgehalt bestimmt werden. Daneben gibt es Ansätze, frühe Anzeichen einer Degeneration über die Verteilung des Entzündungsgrades oder der Natriumkonzentration in der Muskulatur zu visualisieren und quantifizieren. Bis auf die Natrium-Bildgebung werden diese Methoden bei Muskelerkrankungen routinemäßig zur Diagnose und Verlaufskontrolle eingesetzt.Im Bereich der Osteologie und Gerontologie wird zwar die Bedeutung der Muskel-Knochen-Einheit unter anderem für Frakturprädiktion und Gebrechlichkeit im Alter immer wieder betont, Degeneration der Muskulatur wird aber im Wesentlichen über extrinsische Parameter wie Muskelkraft und -funktion erfasst. Häufig benutzte intrinsische Parameter wie DXA Lean Mass oder Muskelvolumen, bestimmt mit CT oder MRT, korrelieren nur mäßig mit extrinsischen Parametern. Eine genauere Charakterisierung von Muskelqualität sollte dieses Manko aber beseitigen. Mit CT und MRT stehen entsprechende Methoden zur Verfügung, die jetzt aber in Studien zur altersassoziierten Muskeldegeneration, in Interventionsstudien und in Studien zur Frakturrisikoprognostik auch eingesetzt werden müssen.


Brachytherapy ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. S135-S136
Author(s):  
Marcus Sonier ◽  
Cameron Appeldoorn ◽  
Ramani Ramaseshan

Author(s):  
Beatrice Heim ◽  
Florian Krismer ◽  
Klaus Seppi

AbstractDifferential diagnosis of parkinsonian syndromes is considered one of the most challenging in neurology. Quantitative MR planimetric measurements were reported to discriminate between progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) and non-PSP-parkinsonism. Several studies have used midbrain to pons ratio (M/P) and the Magnetic Resonance Parkinsonism Index (MRPI) in distinguishing PSP patients from those with Parkinson's disease. The current meta-analysis aimed to compare the performance of these measures in discriminating PSP from multiple system atrophy (MSA). A systematic MEDLINE review identified 59 out of 2984 studies allowing a calculation of sensitivity and specificity using the MRPI or M/P. Meta-analyses of results were carried out using random effects modelling. To assess study quality and risk of bias, the QUADAS-2 tool was used. Eight studies were suitable for analysis. The meta‐analysis showed a pooled sensitivity and specificity for the MRPI of PSP versus MSA of 79.2% (95% CI 72.7–84.4%) and 91.2% (95% CI 79.5–96.5%), and 84.1% (95% CI 77.2–89.2%) and 89.2% (95% CI 81.8–93.8%), respectively, for the M/P. The QUADAS-2 toolbox revealed a high risk of bias regarding the methodological quality of patient selection and index test, as all patients were seen in a specialized outpatient department without avoiding case control design and no predefined threshold was given regarding MRPI or M/P cut-offs. Planimetric brainstem measurements, in special the MRPI and M/P, yield high diagnostic accuracy for the discrimination of PSP from MSA. However, there is an urgent need for well-designed, prospective validation studies to ameliorate the concerns regarding the risk of bias.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Achiraya Teyateeti ◽  
Craig Grossman ◽  
Marisa A. Kollmeier ◽  
Megan Fiasconaro ◽  
Margaret Hopkins ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Woulfe ◽  
F. J. Sullivan ◽  
L. Byrne ◽  
A. J. Doyle ◽  
W. Kam ◽  
...  

AbstractAn optical fibre sensor based on radioluminescence, using the scintillation material terbium doped gadolinium oxysulphide (Gd2O2S:Tb) is evaluated, using a 3D printed anthropomorphic phantom for applications in low dose-rate (LDR) prostate brachytherapy. The scintillation material is embedded in a 700 µm diameter cavity within a 1 mm plastic optical fibre that is fixed within a brachytherapy needle. The high spatial resolution dosimeter is used to measure the dose contribution from Iodine-125 (I-125) seeds. Initially, the effects of sterilisation on the sensors (1) repeatability, (2) response as a function of angle, and (3) response as a function of distance, are evaluated in a custom polymethyl methacrylate phantom. Results obtained in this study demonstrate that the output response of the sensor, pre- and post-sterilisation are within the acceptable measurement uncertainty ranging from a maximum standard deviation of 4.7% pre and 5.5% post respectively, indicating that the low temperature sterilisation process does not damage the sensor or reduce performance. Subsequently, an LDR brachytherapy plan reconstructed using the VariSeed treatment planning system, in an anthropomorphic 3D printed training phantom, was used to assess the suitability of the sensor for applications in LDR brachytherapy. This phantom was printed based on patient anatomy, with the volume and dimensions of the prostate designed to represent that of the patient. I-125 brachytherapy seeds, with an average activity of 0.410 mCi, were implanted into the prostate phantom under trans-rectal ultrasound guidance; following the same techniques as employed in clinical practice by an experienced radiation oncologist. This work has demonstrated that this sensor is capable of accurately identifying when radioactive I-125 sources are introduced into the prostate via a brachytherapy needle.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document