scholarly journals Two forms of short-interval intracortical inhibition in human motor cortex

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Po-Yu Fong ◽  
Danny Spampinato ◽  
Lorenzo Rocchi ◽  
Ricci Hannah ◽  
Yinghui Teng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Short Interval ◽  
Intracortical Inhibition ◽  
Human Motor Cortex ◽  
Human Motor

Late Cortical Disinhibition in Human Motor Cortex: A Triple-Pulse Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Study

2010 ◽  
Vol 103 (1) ◽  
pp. 511-518 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. F. H. Cash ◽  
U. Ziemann ◽  
K. Murray ◽  
G. W. Thickbroom
Keyword(s):  
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Short Interval ◽  
Motor Evoked Potential ◽  
Silent Period ◽  
Intracortical Inhibition ◽  
Human Motor Cortex ◽  
Acid Type ◽  
Human Motor

In human motor cortex transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has been used to identify short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) corresponding to γ-aminobutyric acid type A (GABAA) effects and long-interval intracortical inhibition (LICI) and the cortical silent period (SP) corresponding to postsynaptic GABAB effects. Presynaptic GABAB effects, corresponding to disinhibition, can also be identified with TMS and have been shown to be acting during LICI by measuring SICI after a suprathreshold priming stimulus (PS). The duration of disinhibition is not certain and, guided by studies in experimental preparations, we hypothesized that it may be longer-lasting than postsynaptic inhibition, leading to a period of late cortical disinhibition and consequently a net increase in corticospinal excitability. We tested this first by measuring the motor-evoked potential (MEP) to a test stimulus (TS), delivered after a PS at interpulse intervals (IPIs) ≤300 ms that encompassed the period of PS-induced LICI and its aftermath. MEP amplitude was initially decreased, but then increased at IPIs of 190–210 ms, reaching 160 ± 17% of baseline 200 ms after PS ( P < 0.05). SP duration was 181 ± 5 ms. A second experiment established that the onset of the later period of increased excitability correlated with PS intensity ( r2 = 0.99) and with the duration of the SP ( r2 = 0.99). The third and main experiment demonstrated that SICI was significantly reduced in strength at all IPIs ≤220 ms after PS. We conclude that TMS-induced LICI is associated with a period of disinhibition that is at first masked by LICI, but that outlasts LICI and gives rise to a period during which disinhibition predominates and net excitability is raised. Identification of this late period of disinhibition in human motor cortex may provide an opportunity to explore or modulate the behavior of excitatory networks at a time when inhibitory effects are restrained.

Inhibitory and Disinhibitory Effects on I-Wave Facilitation in Motor Cortex

2011 ◽  
Vol 105 (1) ◽  
pp. 100-106 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.F.H. Cash ◽  
U. Ziemann ◽  
G. W. Thickbroom
Keyword(s):  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Short Interval ◽  
Intracortical Inhibition ◽  
Pulse Interval ◽  
Onset Latency ◽  
Intracortical Facilitation ◽  
Human Motor Cortex ◽  
Human Motor ◽  
Sufficient Strength ◽  
Inhibitory Regulation

A suprathreshold pulse of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) delivered to human motor cortex results in a period of long-interval intracortical inhibition (LICI) followed by a briefer period of disinhibition (late cortical disinhibition [LCD]). Short-interval intracortical facilitation (SICF) is mediated by excitatory networks in the motor cortex responsible for the generation of the indirect (I-) wave volleys that are evoked by TMS at a periodicity of about 1.5 ms. Because the excitatory synaptic network responsible for SICF undergoes inhibitory regulation, we hypothesized that SICF will be modulated during periods of inhibition and disinhibition. In particular we were interested to know whether SICF was up-regulated during disinhibition, implying an increase in excitatory synaptic efficacy. We measured SICF, at a paired-pulse interval of 1.5 ms, at various times (100–300 ms) after a suprathreshold priming stimulus (PS) of sufficient strength to evoke LICI and LCD. We found that the strength of SICF was normal during LICI, but was increased during LCD by an average of 64%. SICF onset latency was reduced by one I-wave interval during LCD and was delayed by one I-wave interval during LICI. We conclude that disinhibition, rather than inhibition, modulates the excitatory neuronal networks that underlie SICF, whereas the I-wave targeted is modified by the presence of both inhibition and disinhibition and that there is therefore a dissociation between the strength and site of SICF interaction. The increase in SICF during disinhibition further indicates that this is a promising period to investigate or modulate excitatory synaptic networks while they are less constrained by ongoing levels of inhibition.

Intracortical Inhibition and Facilitation in Different Representations of the Human Motor Cortex

1998 ◽  
Vol 80 (6) ◽  
pp. 2870-2881 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Chen ◽  
Alda Tam ◽  
Cathrin Bütefisch ◽  
Brian Corwell ◽  
Ulf Ziemann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Biceps Brachii ◽  
Conditioning Stimulus ◽  
Motor Evoked Potential ◽  
Intracortical Inhibition ◽  
Abductor Hallucis ◽  
Human Motor Cortex ◽  
Human Motor ◽  
Motor Representations ◽  
Intracortical Inhibition And Facilitation

Chen, Robert, Alda Tam, Cathrin Bütefisch, Brian Corwell, Ulf Ziemann, John C. Rothwell, and Leonardo G. Cohen. Intracortical inhibition and facilitation in different representations of the human motor cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 80: 2870–2881, 1998. Intracortical inhibition (ICI) and intracortical facilitation (ICF) of the human motor cortex can be studied with paired transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Plastic changes and some neurological disorders in humans are associated with changes in ICI and ICF. Although well characterized in the hand representation, it is not known if ICI and ICF vary across different body part representations. Therefore we studied ICI and ICF in different motor representations of the human motor cortex. The target muscles were rectus abdominus (RA), biceps brachii (BB), abductor pollicis brevis (APB), quadriceps femoris (QF), and abductor hallucis (AH). For each muscle, we measured the rest and active motor thresholds (MTs), the motor-evoked potential (MEP) stimulus-response curve (MEP recruitment), ICI, and ICF. The effects of different interstimulus intervals (ISIs) were studied with a conditioning stimulus (CS) intensity of 80% active MT. The effects of different CS intensities were studied at ISI of 2 ms for ICI and ISI of 15 ms for ICF. MT was lowest for APB, followed by BB, AH, and QF, and was highest for RA. Except for BB, MEP recruitment was generally steeper for muscles with lower MT. ICI and ICF were present in all the motor representations tested. The stimulus intensity necessary to elicit ICI was consistently lower than that required to elicit ICF, suggesting that they are mediated by separate mechanisms. Despite wide differences in MT and MEP recruitment, the absolute CS intensities (expressed as percentage of the stimulator's output) required to elicit ICI and ICF appear unrelated to MT and MEP recruitment in the different muscles tested. These findings suggest that the intracortical mechanisms for inhibition and facilitation in different motor representations are not related to the strength of corticospinal projections.

Evidence for high-fidelity timing-dependent synaptic plasticity of human motor cortex

2013 ◽  
Vol 109 (1) ◽  
pp. 106-112 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. F. H. Cash ◽  
F. L. Mastaglia ◽  
G. W. Thickbroom
Keyword(s):  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Short Interval ◽  
Motor Evoked Potential ◽  
Single Pulse ◽  
Cortical Inhibition ◽  
Membrane Excitability ◽  
Human Motor Cortex ◽  
Excitatory Transmission ◽  
Resting Motor Threshold ◽  
Human Motor

A single transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) pulse typically evokes a short series of spikes in corticospinal neurons [known as indirect (I)-waves] which are thought to arise from transynaptic input. Delivering a second pulse at inter-pulse intervals (IPIs) corresponding to the timing of these I-waves leads to a facilitation of the response, and if stimulus pairs are delivered repeatedly, a persistent LTP-like increase in excitability can occur. This has been demonstrated at an IPI of 1.5 ms, which corresponds to the first I-wave interval, in an intervention referred to as ITMS (I-wave TMS), and it has been argued that this may have similarities with timing-dependent plasticity models. Consequently, we hypothesized that if the second stimulus is delivered so as not to coincide with I-wave timing, it should lead to LTD. We performed a crossover study in 10 subjects in which TMS doublets were timed to coincide (1.5-ms IPI, ITMS1.5) or not coincide (2-ms IPI, ITMS2) with I-wave firing. Single pulse motor-evoked potential (MEP) amplitude, resting motor threshold (RMT), and short-interval cortical inhibition (SICI) were measured from the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle. After ITMS1.5 corticomotor excitability was increased by ∼60% for 15 min ( P < 0.05) and returned to baseline by 20 min. Increasing the IPI by just 500 μs to 2 ms reversed the aftereffect, and MEP amplitude was significantly reduced (∼35%, P < 0.05) for 15 min before returning to baseline. This reduction was not associated with an increase in SICI, suggesting a reduction in excitatory transmission rather than an increase in inhibitory efficacy. RMT also remained unchanged, suggesting that these changes were not due to changes in membrane excitability. Amplitude-matching ITMS2 did not modulate excitability. The results are consistent with timing-dependent synaptic LTP/D-like effects and suggest that there are plasticity mechanisms operating in the human motor cortex with a temporal resolution of the order of a few hundreds of microseconds.

scholarly journals Effects of volitional contraction on intracortical inhibition and facilitation in the human motor cortex

2008 ◽  
Vol 586 (21) ◽  
pp. 5147-5159 ◽  
Author(s):  
Enzo Ortu ◽  
Franca Deriu ◽  
Antonio Suppa ◽  
Eusebio Tolu ◽  
John C. Rothwell
Keyword(s):  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Intracortical Inhibition ◽  
Human Motor Cortex ◽  
Human Motor ◽  
Intracortical Inhibition And Facilitation
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document