Prospective comparative evaluation study of Laser Doppler Imaging and thermal imaging in the assessment of burn depth

Burns ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 124-133 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher Wearn ◽  
Kwang Chear Lee ◽  
Joseph Hardwicke ◽  
Ammar Allouni ◽  
Amy Bamford ◽  
...  
Burns ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 33 (7) ◽  
pp. 833-842 ◽  
Author(s):  
D.J. McGill ◽  
K. Sørensen ◽  
I.R. MacKay ◽  
I. Taggart ◽  
S.B. Watson

2015 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 349-355 ◽  
Author(s):  
Taiichiro Ida ◽  
Hideaki Iwazaki ◽  
Yasushi Kawaguchi ◽  
Satoko Kawauchi ◽  
Tsuyako Ohkura ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 27 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. S91
Author(s):  
R J. Spence ◽  
S J. Monstrey ◽  
D Wilson ◽  
J C. Jeng ◽  
H Hoeksema ◽  
...  

Burns ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 359-363 ◽  
Author(s):  
F.W.H. Kloppenberg ◽  
G.I.J.M. Beerthuizen ◽  
H.J. ten Duis

2003 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 177-186 ◽  
Author(s):  
Colin L. Riordan ◽  
Mark McDonough ◽  
Jeffrey M. Davidson ◽  
Randall Corley ◽  
Cathy Perlov ◽  
...  

Burns ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 396-397 ◽  
Author(s):  
Darren Ng ◽  
Sherilyn Tay ◽  
Simon Booth ◽  
Philip M. Gilbert ◽  
Baljit S. Dheansa

2019 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 619-625 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ru Wang ◽  
Juan Zhao ◽  
Zhenyu Zhang ◽  
Chang Cao ◽  
Yange Zhang ◽  
...  

Abstract An overall assessment of the diagnostic value of laser Doppler imaging (LDI) to assess burn depth in patients is presented based on relevant studies. Both eligible research and relevant articles were identified through specific index searches of Embase, Cochrane, and PubMed databases. The latest study included was published in March 2019 and all eligible publications reported on cohort or cross-sectional research. All articles were tested for heterogeneity by using a suitable effect model to calculate amalgamative values of sensitivity, specificity, and the diagnostic odds ratio (DOR). Analyses of summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) are given for burn depth values. After rigorous screening, 14 studies with a total cohort of 1,818 patients were chosen for the meta-analysis to explore the validity of LDI diagnosis to assess the depth of burns. The burn depth overall sensitivity for LDI was 91% (95% CI: 86–95%) and global specificity was 96% (95% CI: 92–98%). The overall positive likelihood ratio of LDI was 20.35 (95% CI: 10.71–38.69) and the overall negative likelihood ratio was 0.09 (95% CI: 0.05–0.15). The overall DOR was 152.93 (95% CI: 69.44–336.81) of LDI. The acreage under the SROC was not low for LDI (AUC = 0.98; 95% CI: 0.96–0.99). In conclusion, the present analysis reviewed the literature and meta-analysis of studies to validate LDI for the diagnosis of burn depth. The results indicated that LDI has a high accuracy for this diagnostic function.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document