scholarly journals Polyhedral finite elements for nonlinear solid mechanics using tetrahedral subdivisions and dual-cell aggregation

2020 ◽  
Vol 77 ◽  
pp. 101812 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph E. Bishop ◽  
N. Sukumar
Keyword(s):  
Finite Elements ◽  
Solid Mechanics ◽  
Cell Aggregation ◽  
Nonlinear Solid Mechanics

scholarly journals A MATLAB-Based Symbolic Approach for the Quick Developing of Nonlinear Solid Mechanics Finite Elements

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Bilotta
Keyword(s):  
Finite Elements ◽  
Solid Mechanics ◽  
Mathematical Formulation ◽  
Object Oriented Programming ◽  
Theoretical Formulation ◽  
Tetrahedral Element ◽  
Plane Element ◽  
Deformation Kinematics ◽  
Nonlinear Solid Mechanics ◽  
Symbolic Approach

A symbolic mathematical approach for the rapid early phase developing of finite elements is proposed. The algebraic manipulator adopted is MATLAB® and the applicative context is the analysis of hyperelastic solids or structures under the hypothesis of finite deformation kinematics. The work has been finalized through the production, in an object-oriented programming style, of three MATLAB® classes implementing a truss element, a tetrahedral element and plane element. The approach proposed, starting from the mathematical formulation and finishing with the code implementation, is described and its effectiveness, in terms of minimization of the gap between the theoretical formulation and its actual implementation, is highlighted.

On finite elements for nonlinear solid mechanics

2000 ◽  
Vol 75 (3) ◽  
pp. 235 ◽  
Author(s):  
F Armero ◽  
E.N Dvorkin
Keyword(s):  
Finite Elements ◽  
Solid Mechanics ◽  
Nonlinear Solid Mechanics

Modeling Beam–Solid Finite Element Interfaces: A Stabilized Formulation for Contact and Coupled Systems

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (09) ◽  
pp. 1850094 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge A. Montero ◽  
Ghadir Haikal
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element ◽  
Finite Elements ◽  
Computational Models ◽  
Solid Mechanics ◽  
Pressure Field ◽  
Coupled Systems ◽  
Weak Continuity ◽  
Finite Element Discretizations ◽  
Geometric Compatibility ◽  
Element Discretizations

A number of engineering applications involve contact with bodies modeled using specialized theories of solid mechanics like beams or shells. While computational models for contact in 2D and 3D solid mechanics have been extensively developed in the literature, problems involving contact with beams or shells have received less attention. When modeling contact between a solid body represented with beam or shell theory and a domain discretized with solid finite elements, the contact model faces the typical challenges of enforcing geometric compatibility and the transfer of a complete pressure field along the contact interface, with the added complications stemming from the different underlying mathematical formulations and finite element discretizations in the connecting domains. Resultant-based beam and shell theories do not provide direct estimates of surface tractions, therefore rendering the issue of pressure transfer on beam–solid and shell–solid interfaces more problematic. In the absence of specialized contact formulations for solid–beam and solid–shell interfaces, contact models have relied almost exclusively on the Node-To-Surface (NTS) geometric compatibility approach. This formulation suffers from well-known drawbacks, including instability, surface locking and incomplete pressure fields on the interface. The NTS approach, however, remains the method most readily applicable to contact with beam or shell elements among the vast variety of available methods for computational contact modeling using finite elements. The goal of this paper is to bridge the gap in the literature on coupling domains with beam and solid finite element discretizations. We propose an interface formulation for beam–solid interfaces that ensures the transfer of a complete pressure field while enforcing geometric compatibility using standard NTS constraints. The formulation uses a stabilization approach, based on a special form of the Discontinuous Galerkin method, to enforce weak continuity between the stress fields on the solid side of the interface, and the moment and shear resultants in the contacting beam. We show that the proposed formulation is a robust approach for satisfying compatibility constraints while ensuring the transfer of a complete pressure field on beam–solid finite element interfaces that can be used with bilinear and quadratic interpolations in the solid, and Euler or Timoshenko formulations for the beam.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document