scholarly journals Risk stratification for colorectal neoplasia detection in the Flemish colorectal cancer screening programme

2018 ◽  
Vol 56 ◽  
pp. 90-96 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wessel van de Veerdonk ◽  
Guido Van Hal ◽  
Marc Peeters ◽  
Isabel De Brabander ◽  
Geert Silversmit ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 92-97 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johannes Blom ◽  
Christian Löwbeer ◽  
K. Miriam Elfström ◽  
Marika Sventelius ◽  
Daniel Öhman ◽  
...  

Objective Using quantitative Faecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) in colorectal cancer screening enables adjustment of the cut-off for a positive test. As men have higher stool blood levels and higher prevalence of colorectal neoplasia, different cut-off levels can be chosen for men and women. We evaluated participation and positivity rates switching from guaiac-based faecal occult blood test (gFOBT) (Hemoccult®) to FIT (OC-Sensor), using gender-specific cut-offs. Methods The colorectal cancer screening programme of Stockholm-Gotland, Sweden, started in 2008 and invited individuals aged 60–69 to biennial testing using gFOBT. From 1 October 2015 the test was switched to FIT, with positivity cut-offs of 40 (200) and 80 (400) µg Hb/g (ng/mL) faeces for women and men, respectively. The first year was evaluated for compliance and positivity, number of reminders and incorrect/inadequate tests, compared with gFOBT in the preceding 12-month period. Results There were 127,030 and 87,269 individuals invited to screening with gFOBT and FIT, respectively. The change of test increased overall participation by 11.9% (95% confidence interval 11.5%–12.3%) from 56.5% to 68.4% ( p < 0.001). The increase was larger in men (14.3%) than women (9.7%), and in those aged 60–64 (14.2%) than those aged 65–69 (8.7%). The positivity rate was 2.6% in women and 2.5% in men. There was a lower rate of reminders and incorrect/inadequate tests with FIT. Conclusions Within a well-organised colorectal cancer screening programme, changing the test from gFOBT to FIT markedly increased participation, especially among men, and in the younger age group. With a lower cut-off in women than men, the positivity rate was similar.


2010 ◽  
Vol 138 (5) ◽  
pp. S-192
Author(s):  
Stepan Suchanek ◽  
Miroslav Zavoral ◽  
Ondrej Majek ◽  
Ladislav Dusek ◽  
Premysl Fric

2018 ◽  
Vol 52 (4) ◽  
pp. 413-421 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dominika Novak Mlakar ◽  
Tatjana Kofol Bric ◽  
Ana Lucija Škrjanec ◽  
Mateja Krajc

Abstract Background We assessed the incidence and characteristics of interval cancers after faecal immunochemical occult blood test and calculated the test sensitivity in Slovenian colorectal cancer screening programme. Patients and methods The analysis included the population aged between 50 to 69 years, which was invited for screening between April 2011 and December 2012. The persons were followed-up until the next foreseen invitation, in average for 2 years. The data on interval cancers and cancers in non-responders were obtained from cancer registry. Gender, age, years of schooling, the cancer site and stage were compared among three observed groups. We used the proportional incidence method to calculate the screening test sensitivity. Results Among 502,488 persons invited for screening, 493 cancers were detected after positive screening test, 79 interval cancers after negative faecal immunochemical test and 395 in non-responders. The proportion of interval cancers was 13.8%. Among the three observed groups cancers were more frequent in men (p = 0.009) and in persons aged 60+ years (p < 0.001). Comparing screen detected and cancers in non-responders with interval cancers more interval cancers were detected in persons with 10 years of schooling or more (p = 0.029 and p = 0.001), in stage III (p = 0.027) and IV (p < 0.001), and in right hemicolon (p < 0.001). Interval cancers were more frequently in stage I than non-responders cancers (p = 0.004). Test sensitivity of faecal immunochemical test was 88.45%. Conclusions Interval cancers in Slovenian screening programme were detected in expected proportions as in similar programmes. Test sensitivity was among the highest when compared to similar programmes and was accomplished using test kit for two stool samples.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dianne Bosch ◽  
Laura W. Leicher ◽  
Nina C.A. Vermeer ◽  
Koen C.M.J. Peeters ◽  
Wouter H. Vos tot Nederveen Cappel ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 156 (6) ◽  
pp. S-46
Author(s):  
Susanne M. O’Reilly ◽  
Sara McNally ◽  
Therese Mooney ◽  
Patricia Fitzpatrick ◽  
Diarmuid O’Donoghue ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document