Changes in soil carbon and nutrients and related extracellular enzymes in successive rotations of Japanese larch plantations

CATENA ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 204 ◽  
pp. 105386
Author(s):  
Hongxing Wang ◽  
Chunyan Wu ◽  
Dongsheng Chen ◽  
Hongyan Liu ◽  
Xiaomei Sun ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. e03SC01 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emilio Benitez ◽  
Rogelio Nogales ◽  
Serena Doni ◽  
Grazia Masciandaro ◽  
Beatriz Moreno

 Because their crucial role in several soil biochemical cycles and their fast response to changes in soil management, extracellular enzymes activities are widely used as sensitive indicators of ecological change and soil quality. The aim of this work was to determine the effects of soil management on the stable pool of soil carbon cycling enzymes as indicators of essential functions. For this, extracellular β-glucosidase enzymes bounded by humic acids (C higher than 104 Da) were used to compare four long-term contrasting agricultural managements in a rainfed olive orchard representative of semi-arid Mediterranean habitats. The study was conducted for 30 years by designing a random-block of four treatments (nude vs. covered soils) and four replicates. Maintaining cover crops through fall, winter and early spring provoked a more stable and active pool of extracellular β-glucosidase in soils only if spontaneous vegetation was managed with mechanical methods. When herbicides were used during 30 years, the pattern of the molecular composition and activity of humus β-glucosidase complexes were similar in covered and nude soils, although higher activity was retrieved in the former. Tillage management increased carbon mineralization and the level of humic substances and the activity of β-glucosidase humic-bound were quite lower than in the rest of treatments. Given the ecological role of extracellular soil carbon cycling enzymes, the characterization of humus β-glucosidase complexes could be an adequate indicator of sustainability of agricultural management systems.


Geoderma ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 374 ◽  
pp. 114426
Author(s):  
J.Y. Wang ◽  
C.J. Ren ◽  
X.X. Feng ◽  
L. Zhang ◽  
R. Doughty ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ji Chen

<p>Soil extracellular enzymes (EEs) catalyze rate-limiting steps in soil carbon (C) decomposition, which may have important implications for soil C cycling. Hydrolytic and oxidative EEs are targeting the decomposition of different soil C pools with distinct microbial C use efficiency. Here, we analyzed the responses of hydrolytic and oxidative EEAs to experimental warming, enhanced N deposition and altered precipitation. Experimental warming profoundly increased oxidative EEAs by 21%, while having no effect on hydrolytic EEAs. Enhanced N addition significantly decreased oxidative EEAs by 21% but enhanced hydrolytic EEAs by 15%. Increased precipitation substantially stimulated oxidative EEAs by 21%, while having no effect on hydrolytic EEAs. On the contrary, decreased precipitation significantly suppressed oxidative EEAs by 11% but enhanced hydrolytic EEAs by 26%. Those results together showed that hydrolytic and oxidative EEAs generally responded asymmetrically to the experimental treatments, representing the trade-offs between microbial hydrolytic and oxidative EEs production. Moreover, experimental treatments were more likely to have positive effects on soil C stock when oxidative EEAs respond negatively, and vice versa. One explanation might be that degradation of soil C pools that targeted by oxidative EEs were typical with lower microbial C use efficiency, since additional energy was required for the deconstruction of those complex and recalcitrant soil C pools. Altogether, our results highlight that soil EEAs can potentially be harnessed towards soil C sequestration if we can better understand the underlying mechanisms associated with the trade-offs between hydrolytic and oxidative EEAs.</p>


Author(s):  
W. R. EMANUEL ◽  
J. S. OLSON ◽  
W. M. POST ◽  
A. G. STANGENBERGER ◽  
P. J. ZINKE

Author(s):  
W. R. EMANUEL ◽  
J. S. OLSON ◽  
W. M. POST ◽  
A. G. STANGENBERGER ◽  
P. J. ZINKE

Author(s):  
W. R. EMANUEL ◽  
J. S. OLSON ◽  
W. M. POST ◽  
A. G. STANGENBERGER ◽  
P. J. ZINKE

Author(s):  
J. A. NEWCOMER ◽  
G. RAPALEE ◽  
S. E. TRUMBORE
Keyword(s):  

2016 ◽  
Vol 67 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-69
Author(s):  
M Forouzangohar ◽  
R Setia ◽  
DD Wallace ◽  
CR Nitschke ◽  
LT Bennett

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document