Corrigendum to “A correlation for interfacial area concentration in high void fraction flows in large diameter channels” [Chem. Eng. Sci. 131 (2015) 172–186]

2020 ◽  
Vol 222 ◽  
pp. 115768
Author(s):  
J.P. Schlegel ◽  
T. Hibiki
Author(s):  
Tatsuya Hazuku ◽  
Naohisa Tamura ◽  
Norihiro Fukamachi ◽  
Tomoji Takamasa ◽  
Takashi Hibiki ◽  
...  

Accurate prediction of the interfacial area concentration is essential to successful development of the interfacial transfer terms in the two-fluid model. Mechanistic modeling of the interfacial area concentration entirely relies on accurate local flow measurements over extensive flow conditions and channel geometries. From this point of view, accurate measurements of flow parameters such as void fraction, interfacial area concentration, gas velocity, bubble Sauter mean diameter, and bubble number density were performed by the image processing method at five axial locations in vertical upward bubbly flows using a 1.02 mm-diameter pipe. The frictional pressure loss was also measured by a differential pressure cell. In the experiment, the superficial liquid velocity and the void fraction ranged from 1.02 m/s to 4.89 m/s and from 0.980% to 24.6%, respectively. The obtained data give near complete information on the time-averaged local hydrodynamic parameters of two-phase flow. These data can be used for the development of reliable constitutive relations which reflect the true transfer mechanisms in two-phase flow. As the first step to understand the flow characteristics in mini-channels, the applicability of the existing drift-flux model, interfacial area correlation, and frictional pressure correlation was examined by the data obtained in the mini-channel.


1997 ◽  
Vol 119 (4) ◽  
pp. 916-922 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Wilmarth ◽  
M. Ishii

Adiabatic concurrent vertical two-phase flow of air and water through narrow rectangular channels, gap widths 1 mm and 2 mm, was investigated. This study involved the observation of flow using a charge coupled device (CCD) camera. These images were then digitized and examined by applying an image processing technique to determine local average void fraction and local average interfacial area concentration. The void fraction data were then plotted using a drift flux plot to determine the distribution parameter and vapor drift velocity for each separate flow regime.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document