scholarly journals Incidence of Interval Colorectal Cancer Among Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients Undergoing Regular Colonoscopic Surveillance

2015 ◽  
Vol 13 (9) ◽  
pp. 1656-1661 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erik Mooiweer ◽  
Andrea E. van der Meulen-de Jong ◽  
Cyriel Y. Ponsioen ◽  
C. Janneke van der Woude ◽  
Ad A. van Bodegraven ◽  
...  
2014 ◽  
Vol 146 (5) ◽  
pp. S-632 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erik Mooiweer ◽  
Andrea E. van der Meulen -de Jong ◽  
Cyriel Ponsioen ◽  
Christien J. van der Woude ◽  
Jeroen M. Jansen ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 112 ◽  
pp. S79-S80
Author(s):  
Shirley Cohen-Mekelburg ◽  
Yecheskel Schneider ◽  
Stephanie Gold ◽  
Gaurav Ghosh ◽  
Russell Rosenblatt ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 65 (1) ◽  
pp. 111-118
Author(s):  
Kristin E. Burke ◽  
Jennifer Nayor ◽  
Emily J. Campbell ◽  
Ashwin N. Ananthakrishnan ◽  
Hamed Khalili ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 101 (10) ◽  
pp. 1671-1675 ◽  
Author(s):  
M W M D Lutgens ◽  
◽  
B Oldenburg ◽  
P D Siersema ◽  
A A van Bodegraven ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 154 (6) ◽  
pp. S-146
Author(s):  
Kristin E. Burke ◽  
Jennifer Nayor ◽  
Ashwin Ananthakrishnan ◽  
Hamed Khalili ◽  
James Richter

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (8) ◽  
pp. 1172-1177 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shailja C Shah ◽  
Steven H Itzkowitz

Abstract One of the most feared complications of inflammatory bowel disease [IBD]-associated colitis is colorectal cancer. When considering the substantial increase in the prevalence of IBD, without any anticipated decline, coupled with decreasing colectomy rates for dysplasia and expanding medical options for effectively controlling inflammation, it is predicted that the pool of people living with—and ageing with—colonic IBD, who are recommended to undergo lifelong colonoscopic surveillance for colorectal neoplasia, will strain existing resources and challenge the sustainability of current guideline-based surveillance recommendations. At the same time, we are missing the opportunity for early detection in a group that is overlooked as high-risk, as a substantial proportion of colorectal cancers are being diagnosed in individuals with colonic IBD who have disease duration shorter than when guidelines recommend surveillance initiation. Here, we reappraise: 1] inflammation as a dynamic risk factor that considers patients’ cumulative course; 2] time of screening initiation that is not based primarily on absolute disease duration; and 3] surveillance intervals as an iterative determination based on individual patient factors and consecutive colonoscopic findings. This Viewpoint supports a paradigm shift that will ideally result in a more effective and higher-value colorectal cancer prevention approach in IBD.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document