Test characteristics of cross-sectional imaging and concordance with endoscopy in postoperative Crohn’s disease

Author(s):  
Salam P. Bachour ◽  
Ravi Shah ◽  
Ruishen Lyu ◽  
Takahiro Nakamura ◽  
Michael Shen ◽  
...  
Gut ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 62 (12) ◽  
pp. 1806-1816 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jose-Manuel Benitez ◽  
Marie-Alice Meuwis ◽  
Catherine Reenaers ◽  
Catherine Van Kemseke ◽  
Paul Meunier ◽  
...  

Gut ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 68 (6) ◽  
pp. 1115-1126 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dominik Bettenworth ◽  
Arne Bokemeyer ◽  
Mark Baker ◽  
Ren Mao ◽  
Claire E Parker ◽  
...  

Patients with Crohn’s disease commonly develop ileal and less commonly colonic strictures, containing various degrees of inflammation and fibrosis. While predominantly inflammatory strictures may benefit from a medical anti-inflammatory treatment, predominantly fibrotic strictures currently require endoscopic balloon dilation or surgery. Therefore, differentiation of the main components of a stricturing lesion is key for defining the therapeutic management. The role of endoscopy to diagnose the nature of strictures is limited by the superficial inspection of the intestinal mucosa, the lack of depth of mucosal biopsies and by the risk of sampling error due to a heterogeneous distribution of inflammation and fibrosis within a stricturing lesion. These limitations may be in part overcome by cross-sectional imaging techniques such as ultrasound, CT and MRI, allowing for a full thickness evaluation of the bowel wall and associated abnormalities. This systematic literature review provides a comprehensive summary of currently used radiologic definitions of strictures. It discusses, by assessing only manuscripts with histopathology as a gold standard, the accuracy for diagnosis of the respective modalities as well as their capability to characterise strictures in terms of inflammation and fibrosis. Definitions for strictures on cross-sectional imaging are heterogeneous; however, accuracy for stricture diagnosis is very high. Although conventional cross-sectional imaging techniques have been reported to distinguish inflammation from fibrosis and grade their severity, they are not sufficiently accurate for use in routine clinical practice. Finally, we present recent consensus recommendations and highlight experimental techniques that may overcome the limitations of current technologies.


2017 ◽  
Vol 62 (6) ◽  
pp. 1628-1636 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cécile Campos ◽  
Antoine Perrey ◽  
Céline Lambert ◽  
Bruno Pereira ◽  
Marion Goutte ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 32-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Massimo Tonolini ◽  
Chiara Villa ◽  
Alessandro Campari ◽  
Anna Ravelli ◽  
Roberto Bianco ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Daniel Stocker ◽  
Michael J King ◽  
Maria El Homsi ◽  
Guillermo Carbonell ◽  
Octavia Bane ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and Aims Current consensus recommendations define small bowel strictures (SBS) in Crohn’s disease (CD) on imaging as luminal narrowing with unequivocal upstream bowel dilation. The aim of this study was to 1) evaluate the performance of cross-sectional imaging for SBS diagnosis in CD using luminal narrowing with upstream SB dilation and luminal narrowing with or without upstream dilation, and 2) compare the diagnostic performance of CT and MR enterography (MRE) for SBS diagnosis. Methods One hundred and eleven CD patients (81 with pathologically confirmed SBS, 30 controls) who underwent CT and/or MRE were assessed. Two radiologists (R1, R2) blinded to pathology findings independently assessed the presence of luminal narrowing and upstream SB dilation. Statistical analysis was performed for a) luminal narrowing with or without SB upstream dilation (“possible SBS”), b) luminal narrowing with upstream SB dilation ≥3cm (“definite SBS”). Results Sensitivity for detecting SBS was significantly higher using “possible SBS” (R1, 82.1%; R2, 77.9%) compared to “definite SBS” (R1, 62.1%; R2, 65.3%; p<0.0001) with equivalent specificity (R1, 96.7%; R2, 93.3%; p>0.9). Using criterion “possible SBS”, sensitivity/specificity were equivalent between CT (R1, 87.3%/93.3%; R2, 83.6%/86.7%) and MRE (R1, 75.0%/100%; R2: 70.0%/100%). Using criterion “definite SBS”, CT showed significantly higher sensitivity (78.2%) compared to MRE (40.0%) for R1 but not R2 with similar specificities (CT, 86.7%-93.3%; MRE, 100%). Conclusion SBS can be diagnosed using luminal narrowing alone without the need for upstream dilation. CT and MRE show similar diagnostic performance for SBS diagnosis using luminal narrowing with or without upstream dilation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document