A comment on “A comment on ‘A fuzzy DEA/AR approach to the selection of flexible manufacturing systems”’ and “A fuzzy DEA/AR approach to the selection of flexible manufacturing systems”

2010 ◽  
Vol 59 (4) ◽  
pp. 1019-1021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhongbao Zhou ◽  
Wenyu Yang ◽  
Chaoqun Ma ◽  
Wenbin Liu
2009 ◽  
Vol 56 (4) ◽  
pp. 1713-1714 ◽  
Author(s):  
G.R. Jahanshahloo ◽  
M. Sanei ◽  
M. Rostamy-Malkhalifeh ◽  
H. Saleh

2018 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
pp. 241-257 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanjeet Singh

The concept of assurance region (AR) was proposed in Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) literature to restrict the ratio of any two weights within a given lower and upper bounds so as to overcome the difficulty of ignoring or relying too much on any of the input or output while calculating the efficiency. Further, AR approach was extended to handle fuzzy input/output data. But, available information is not always sufficient to define the impreciseness in the input/output data using classical fuzzy sets. Intuitionistic Fuzzy Set (IFS) is a generalized fuzzy set to characterize the impreciseness by taking into account degree of hesitation also. In this paper, intuitionistic fuzzy DEA/AR approach has been proposed to evaluate the efficiency where input/output data are represented as intuitionistic fuzzy. Based on the expected value approach, classical cross efficiency has also been generalized to rank the DMUs for the case of intuitionistic fuzzy data. To the best of my knowledge, this is the first attempt to propose assurance region approach (DEA/AR) in DEA with intuitionistic fuzzy input/output data. This approach is useful for the experts and decision makers when they are hesitant about defining the degree of membership/non-membership of fuzzy data. Results have been illustrated and validated using a case of flexible manufacturing systems (FMS).


2012 ◽  
Vol 220-223 ◽  
pp. 925-928
Author(s):  
Silvia Sebenova ◽  
Katarina Krajcova ◽  
Frantisek Pechacek

This paper is focused on the methods, which are used for planning, running and optimization of material flow. These methods are very important element of each production and company. There are several methods which are used, for example JIT (Just in Time), Kanban, TOC (Theorie of Constraints), etc. A selection of appropriate method affects largely production costs, efficiency and produced quantity. For the laboratory of flexible manufacturing systems with robotized manipulation supported by no drawing production were compared several methods and on the based their advantages, disadvantages and suitability of use was selected the most appropriate method of planning, running and optimization of material flow.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document