735 Early Success of Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation in Patients With Structural Heart Disease: A Single Centre Experience

2012 ◽  
Vol 28 (5) ◽  
pp. S382-S383
Author(s):  
F. Khan ◽  
J. Roshan ◽  
M. Das ◽  
L. Harris ◽  
L. Wanounou ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (10-11) ◽  
pp. 429-429
Author(s):  
Nikola Pavlović ◽  
Vjekoslav Radeljić ◽  
Ivan Zeljković ◽  
Ivica Benko ◽  
Šime Manola

2011 ◽  
Vol 22 (10) ◽  
pp. 1123-1128 ◽  
Author(s):  
DAVID S. FRANKEL ◽  
STAVROS E. MOUNTANTONAKIS ◽  
MELISSA R. ROBINSON ◽  
ERICA S. ZADO ◽  
DAVID J. CALLANS ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 118 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam J Graham ◽  
Michele Orini ◽  
Pier D Lambiase ◽  
◽  
◽  
...  

Recurrent episodes of ventricular tachycardia in patients with structural heart disease are associated with increased mortality and morbidity, despite the life-saving benefits of implantable cardiac defibrillators. Reducing implantable cardiac defibrillator therapies is important, as recurrent shocks can cause increased myocardial damage and stunning, despite the conversion of ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation. Catheter ablation has emerged as a potential therapeutic option either for primary or secondary prevention of these arrhythmias, particularly in post-myocardial infarction cases where the substrate is well defined. However, the outcomes of catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia in structural heart disease remain unsatisfactory in comparison with other electrophysiological procedures. The disappointing efficacy of ventricular tachycardia ablation in structural heart disease is multifactorial. In this review, we discuss the issues surrounding this and examine the limitations of current mapping approaches, as well as newer technologies that might help address them.


2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 177 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jackson J Liang ◽  
Pasquale Santangeli ◽  
David J Callans ◽  
◽  
◽  
...  

Ventricular tachycardia (VT) often occurs in the setting of structural heart disease and can affect patients with ischaemic or nonischaemic cardiomyopathies. Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) provide mortality benefit and are therefore indicated for secondary prevention in patients with sustained VT, but they do not reduce arrhythmia burden. ICD shocks are associated with increased morbidity and mortality, and antiarrhythmic medications are often used to prevent recurrent episodes. Catheter ablation is an effective treatment option for patients with VT in the setting of structural heart disease and, when successful, can reduce the number of ICD shocks. However, whether VT ablation results in a mortality benefit remains unclear. We aim to review the long-term outcomes in patients with different types of structural heart disease treated with VT ablation.


2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 161 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mouhannad M Sadek ◽  
Robert D Schaller ◽  
Gregory E Supple ◽  
David S Frankel ◽  
Michael P Riley ◽  
...  

Scar-related reentry is the most common mechanism of monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) in patients with structural heart disease. Catheter ablation has assumed an increasingly important role in the management of VT in this setting, and has been shown to reduce VT recurrence and implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) shocks. The approach to mapping and ablation will depend on the underlying heart disease etiology, VT inducibility and haemodynamic stability. This review explores pre-procedural planning, approach to ablation of both mappable and unmappable VT, and post-procedural testing. Future developments in techniques and technology that may improve outcomes are discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document