Revised Gleason Grading System Is a Better Predictor of Indolent Prostate Cancer at the Time of Diagnosis: Retrospective Clinical-Pathological Study on Matched Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Specimens

2014 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 325-329 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesca Giunchi ◽  
Eugenio Brunocilla ◽  
Marco Borghesi ◽  
Simona Rizzi ◽  
Martina Sofia Ricci ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 140 (10) ◽  
pp. 1140-1152 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oleksandr N. Kryvenko ◽  
Jonathan I. Epstein

Since 1966, when Donald Gleason, MD, first proposed grading prostate cancer based on its histologic architecture, there have been numerous changes in clinical and pathologic practices relating to prostate cancer. Patterns 1 and 2, comprising more than 30% of cases in the original publications by Gleason, are no longer reported on biopsy and are rarely diagnosed on radical prostatectomy. Many of these cases may even have been mimickers of prostate cancer that were described later with the use of contemporary immunohistochemistry. The original Gleason system predated many newly described variants of prostate cancer and our current concept of intraductal carcinoma. Gleason also did not describe how to report prostate cancer on biopsy with multiple cores of cancer or on radical prostatectomy with separate tumor nodules. To address these issues, the International Society of Urological Pathology first made revisions to the grading system in 2005, and subsequently in 2014. Additionally, a new grading system composed of Grade Groups 1 to 5 that was first developed in 2013 at the Johns Hopkins Hospital and subsequently validated in a large multi-institutional and multimodal study was presented at the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology meeting and accepted both by participating pathologists as well as urologists, oncologists, and radiation therapists. In the present study, we describe updates to the grading of prostate cancer along with the new grading system.


2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katsuki Tsuchiyama ◽  
Hideaki Ito ◽  
Minekatsu Taga ◽  
Konosuke Oshinoya ◽  
Kenichi Nagano ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 411-419 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia Harnden ◽  
Mike D Shelley ◽  
Bernadette Coles ◽  
John Staffurth ◽  
Malcom D Mason

The Prostate ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 77 (3) ◽  
pp. 263-273 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paolo Dell'Oglio ◽  
Robert Jeffrey Karnes ◽  
Giorgio Gandaglia ◽  
Nicola Fossati ◽  
Armando Stabile ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 95 (8) ◽  
pp. 1146-1152 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rodolfo Montironi ◽  
Roberta Mazzuccheli ◽  
Marina Scarpelli ◽  
Antonio Lopez-Beltran ◽  
Giovanni Fellegara ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Ashwyna Sunassee ◽  
Ghadah Al Sannaa ◽  
Jae Y. Ro

The Gleason grading system for prostatic carcinoma is widely used internationally and is based on microscopic architectural patterns of tumors. Over the years, there have been modifications to the original grading system established by Donald F Gleason in 1966 and refined in 1974 which have subsequently been established by the World Health Organization in its WHO Classification of Tumors of the Urinary System and Male Genital Organs book, published in 2016. There have been certain practical issues associated with the changes, of note, the addition of intraductal carcinoma of prostate (IDC-P), which unlike its breast counterpart rarely occurs in isolation without association with invasive carcinoma and tends to be associated with high-grade invasive carcinoma. In addition, the Grade group system has been introduced which categorizes tumors into prognostically relevant groups based on the histological grade scores. The grade group system brings to light the importance of making accurate scoring and subsequent grouping of the tumors as it affects the clinical treatment, prognostic implication and stage assignment. Molecular pathology of the prostate is not widely utilized in clinical practice, but is emerging. The most common genomic aberration in prostate cancer includes gene fusion, amplification, deletion, and mutation. In addition, up and down regulation of gene expression in critical cellular pathways is also at play. A series of long noncoding RNA expression changes have been also unveiled from transcriptome sequencing data. They play a regulatory role in prostate cancer and are promising diagnostic and potentially prognostic markers as well as molecular treatment strategy. In this review, we summarize recent advances in molecular pathology of prostate cancer and their emerging clinical utility with currently available molecular tests. In this review article, we discuss the followings: 1) Gleason grading system with its modification, 2) Grade group, 3) Intraductal carcinoma, and 4) molecular pathology. Additionally, we present that molecular studies continue to emerge, and there is significant opportunity for targeted therapeutic options that remains to be explored in depth.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document