30. Sensory nerve action potential electrical power may be more sensitive than amplitude in the assessment of axonal loss

2009 ◽  
Vol 120 (2) ◽  
pp. e97
Author(s):  
N.M. Roberts ◽  
J.J. Wertsch
2010 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 318-323 ◽  
Author(s):  
Niles M. Roberts ◽  
Jacqueline J. Wertsch

2012 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 833-839 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muneharu Ando ◽  
Tetsuya Tamaki ◽  
Mamoru Kawakami ◽  
Akihito Minamide ◽  
Yukihiro Nakagawa ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 130 (7) ◽  
pp. 1160-1165
Author(s):  
Yun-Ru Lai ◽  
Chih-Cheng Huang ◽  
Wen-Chan Chiu ◽  
Rue-Tsuan Liu ◽  
Nai-Wen Tsai ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 117 (2) ◽  
pp. 565-567
Author(s):  
Mehmet Ilker Yon ◽  
Hafize Nalan Gunes ◽  
Burcu Gokce Cokal ◽  
Selda Keskin Guler ◽  
Tahir Kurtulus Yoldas

2013 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 199-206 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Şahin ◽  
N. Ş. Atalay ◽  
N. Akkaya ◽  
Ö. Ercidoğan ◽  
B. Başakçı ◽  
...  

In this study, we aimed to determine whether there is a correlation between the electrodiagnostic findings and the functional status, muscle strength and sensibility in patients with traumatic nerve injury to the wrists. We assessed 50 patients at a mean of 11.6 months (SD 5.85) (range 6–25) after nerve injury. Sensibility was assessed by monofilament testing. Motor function was evaluated by assessing the manual muscle grade of the abductor pollicis brevis and abductor digiti minimi muscles. Function was evaluated by the Sollerman Hand Function Test. The amplitudes of the compound muscle action potential and the sensory nerve action potential were determined by electroneuromyography. While the compound muscle action potential and sensory nerve action potential amplitudes had significant correlation with muscle grade and Semmes Weinstein Monofilament tests, there was no correlation with the functional scores.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document