129. Acoustic sensitivity of autism spectrum disorder: Event related potential (ERP) study

2009 ◽  
Vol 120 (5) ◽  
pp. e176
Author(s):  
Kiyoshi Yaguchi
Author(s):  
Emme O’Rourke ◽  
Emily L. Coderre

AbstractWhile many individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) experience difficulties with language processing, non-linguistic semantic processing may be intact. We examined neural responses to an implicit semantic priming task by comparing N400 responses—an event-related potential related to semantic processing—in response to semantically related or unrelated pairs of words or pictures. Adults with ASD showed larger N400 responses than typically developing adults for pictures, but no group differences occurred for words. However, we also observed complex modulations of N400 amplitude by age and by level of autistic traits. These results offer important implications for how groups are delineated and compared in autism research.


Author(s):  
Erin Kang ◽  
Cara M. Keifer ◽  
Emily J. Levy ◽  
Jennifer H. Foss-Feig ◽  
James C. McPartland ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shashwat Kala ◽  
Max J. Rolison ◽  
Dominic A. Trevisan ◽  
Adam J. Naples ◽  
Kevin Pelphrey ◽  
...  

Background: Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by primary difficulties in social function. Individuals with ASD display slowed neural processing of faces, as indexed by the latency of the N170, a face-sensitive event-related potential. Currently, there are no objective biomarkers of ASD useful in clinical care or research. Efficacy of behavioral treatment is currently evaluated through subjective clinical impressions. To explore whether the N170 might have utility as an objective index of treatment response, we examined N170 before and after receipt of an empirically validated behavioral treatment in children with ASD.Method: Electroencephalography (EEG) data were obtained on a preliminary cohort of preschool-aged children with ASD before and after a 16-week course of PRT and in a subset of participants in waitlist control (16-weeks before the start of PRT) and follow-up (16-weeks after the end of PRT). EEG was recorded while participants viewed computer-generated faces with neutral and fearful affect.Results: Significant reductions in N170 latency to faces were observed following 16 weeks of PRT intervention. Change in N170 latency was not observed in the waitlist-control condition.Conclusions: This exploratory study offers suggestive evidence that N170 latency may index response to behavioral treatment. Future, more rigorous, studies in larger samples are indicated to evaluate whether the N170 may be useful as a biomarker of treatment response.


2020 ◽  
Vol 131 (2) ◽  
pp. 406-413
Author(s):  
Amanda Cremone-Caira ◽  
Akshita Vaidyanathan ◽  
Danielle Hyatt ◽  
Rachel Gilbert ◽  
Tessa Clarkson ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Girija Kadlaskar ◽  
Sophia Bergmann ◽  
Rebecca McNally Keehn ◽  
Amanda Seidl ◽  
Brandon Keehn

Behavioral differences in responding to tactile and auditory stimuli are widely reported in individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). However, the neural mechanisms underlying distinct tactile and auditory reactivity patterns in ASD remain unclear with theories implicating differences in both perceptual and attentional processes. The current study sought to investigate (1) the neural indices of early perceptual and later attentional factors underlying tactile and auditory processing in children with and without ASD, and (2) the relationship between neural indices of tactile and auditory processing and ASD symptomatology. Participants included 14, 6–12-year-olds with ASD and 14 age- and non-verbal IQ matched typically developing (TD) children. Children participated in an event-related potential (ERP) oddball paradigm during which they watched a silent video while being presented with tactile and auditory stimuli (i.e., 80% standard speech sound/a/; 10% oddball speech sound/i/; 10% novel vibrotactile stimuli on the fingertip with standard speech sound/a/). Children’s early and later ERP responses to tactile (P1 and N2) and auditory stimuli (P1, P3a, and P3b) were examined. Non-parametric analyses showed that children with ASD displayed differences in early perceptual processing of auditory (i.e., lower amplitudes at central region of interest), but not tactile, stimuli. Analysis of later attentional components did not show differences in response to tactile and auditory stimuli in the ASD and TD groups. Together, these results suggest that differences in auditory responsivity patterns could be related to perceptual factors in children with ASD. However, despite differences in caregiver-reported sensory measures, children with ASD did not differ in their neural reactivity to infrequent touch-speech stimuli compared to TD children. Nevertheless, correlational analyses confirmed that inter-individual differences in neural responsivity to tactile and auditory stimuli were related to social skills in all children. Finally, we discuss how the paradigm and stimulus type used in the current study may have impacted our results. These findings have implications for everyday life, where individual differences in responding to tactile and auditory stimuli may impact social functioning.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. e0216051 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca P. Thomas ◽  
Leah A. L. Wang ◽  
Whitney Guthrie ◽  
Meredith Cola ◽  
Joseph P. McCleery ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document