FV 6. Factors influencing the adequacy of determining hemispheric language lateralization in presurgical epilepsy patients using functional transcranial Doppler sonography (fTCD)

2021 ◽  
Vol 132 (8) ◽  
pp. e31
Author(s):  
N. Conradi ◽  
M. Salim ◽  
M. Behrens ◽  
A. Hermsen ◽  
T. Kannemann ◽  
...  
Stroke ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 29 (6) ◽  
pp. 1155-1159 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Knecht ◽  
M. Deppe ◽  
E.-B. Ringelstein ◽  
M. Wirtz ◽  
H. Lohmann ◽  
...  

Stroke ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 82-86 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Knecht ◽  
M. Deppe ◽  
A. Ebner ◽  
H. Henningsen ◽  
T. Huber ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 181801 ◽  
Author(s):  
Z. V. J. Woodhead ◽  
A. R. Bradshaw ◽  
A. C. Wilson ◽  
P. A. Thompson ◽  
D. V. M. Bishop

Hemispheric dominance for language can vary from task to task, but it is unclear if this reflects error of measurement or independent lateralization of different language systems. We used functional transcranial Doppler sonography to assess language lateralization within the middle cerebral artery territory in 37 adults (seven left-handers) on six tasks, each given on two occasions. Tasks taxed different aspects of language function. A pre-registered structural equation analysis was used to compare models of means and covariances. For most people, a single lateralized factor explained most of the covariance between tasks. A minority, however, showed dissociation of asymmetry, giving a second factor. This was mostly derived from a receptive task, which was highly reliable but not lateralized. The results suggest that variation in the strength of language lateralization reflects true individual differences and not just error of measurement. The inclusion of several tasks in a laterality battery makes it easier to detect cases of atypical asymmetry.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 200696
Author(s):  
Z. V. J. Woodhead ◽  
P. A. Thompson ◽  
E. M. Karlsson ◽  
D. V. M. Bishop

A previous study we reported in this journal suggested that left and right-handers may differ in their patterns of lateralization for different language tasks (Woodhead et al. 2019 R. Soc. Open Sci. 6 , 181801. ( doi:10.1098/rsos.181801 )). However, it had too few left-handers ( N = 7) to reach firm conclusions. For this update paper, further participants were added to the sample to create separate groups of left- ( N = 31) and right-handers ( N = 43). Two hypotheses were tested: (1) that lateralization would be weaker at the group level in left-than right-handers; and (2) that left-handers would show weaker covariance in lateralization between tasks, supporting a two-factor model. All participants performed the same protocol as in our previous paper: lateralization was measured using functional transcranial Doppler sonography during six different language tasks, on two separate testing sessions. The results supported hypothesis 1, with significant differences in laterality between groups for four out of six tasks. For hypothesis 2, structural equation modelling showed that there was stronger evidence for a two-factor model in left than right-handers; furthermore, examination of the factor loadings suggested that the pattern of laterality across tasks may also differ between handedness groups. These results expand on what is known about the differences in laterality between left- and right-handers.


2010 ◽  
Vol 52 (4) ◽  
pp. 331-336 ◽  
Author(s):  
ANJA HAAG ◽  
NICOLA MOELLER ◽  
SUSANNE KNAKE ◽  
ANKE HERMSEN ◽  
WOLFGANG H OERTEL ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document