MDCC-Net: Multiscale double-channel convolution U-Net framework for colorectal tumor segmentation

2021 ◽  
Vol 130 ◽  
pp. 104183
Author(s):  
Suichang Zheng ◽  
Xue Lin ◽  
Weifeng Zhang ◽  
Baochun He ◽  
Shuangfu Jia ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Wenbo Zhang ◽  
Guang Yang ◽  
He Huang ◽  
Weiji Yang ◽  
Xiaomei Xu ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Yi-Jie Huang ◽  
Qi Dou ◽  
Zi-Xian Wang ◽  
Li-Zhi Liu ◽  
Ying Jin ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Cheng Chen ◽  
Kangneng Zhou ◽  
Huilin Wang ◽  
YuanYuan Lu ◽  
Zhiliang Wang ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Mumtaz Hussain Soomro ◽  
Matteo Coppotelli ◽  
Silvia Conforto ◽  
Maurizio Schmid ◽  
Gaetano Giunta ◽  
...  

The main goal of this work is to automatically segment colorectal tumors in 3D T2-weighted (T2w) MRI with reasonable accuracy. For such a purpose, a novel deep learning-based algorithm suited for volumetric colorectal tumor segmentation is proposed. The proposed CNN architecture, based on densely connected neural network, contains multiscale dense interconnectivity between layers of fine and coarse scales, thus leveraging multiscale contextual information in the network to get better flow of information throughout the network. Additionally, the 3D level-set algorithm was incorporated as a postprocessing task to refine contours of the network predicted segmentation. The method was assessed on T2-weighted 3D MRI of 43 patients diagnosed with locally advanced colorectal tumor (cT3/T4). Cross validation was performed in 100 rounds by partitioning the dataset into 30 volumes for training and 13 for testing. Three performance metrics were computed to assess the similarity between predicted segmentation and the ground truth (i.e., manual segmentation by an expert radiologist/oncologist), including Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), recall rate (RR), and average surface distance (ASD). The above performance metrics were computed in terms of mean and standard deviation (mean ± standard deviation). The DSC, RR, and ASD were 0.8406 ± 0.0191, 0.8513 ± 0.0201, and 2.6407 ± 2.7975 before postprocessing, and these performance metrics became 0.8585 ± 0.0184, 0.8719 ± 0.0195, and 2.5401 ± 2.402 after postprocessing, respectively. We compared our proposed method to other existing volumetric medical image segmentation baseline methods (particularly 3D U-net and DenseVoxNet) in our segmentation tasks. The experimental results reveal that the proposed method has achieved better performance in colorectal tumor segmentation in volumetric MRI than the other baseline techniques.


Author(s):  
Yankai Jiang ◽  
Shufeng Xu ◽  
Hongjie Fan ◽  
Jiahong Qian ◽  
Weizhi Luo ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 46 (8) ◽  
pp. 3532-3542 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoming Liu ◽  
Shuxu Guo ◽  
Huimao Zhang ◽  
Kan He ◽  
Shengnan Mu ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Bazaga ◽  
R Sánchez-Ocaña ◽  
A Yaiza Carbajo ◽  
FJ García-Alonso ◽  
M de Benito ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 64 (4) ◽  
pp. 40412-1-40412-11
Author(s):  
Kexin Bai ◽  
Qiang Li ◽  
Ching-Hsin Wang

Abstract To address the issues of the relatively small size of brain tumor image datasets, severe class imbalance, and low precision in existing segmentation algorithms for brain tumor images, this study proposes a two-stage segmentation algorithm integrating convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and conventional methods. Four modalities of the original magnetic resonance images were first preprocessed separately. Next, preliminary segmentation was performed using an improved U-Net CNN containing deep monitoring, residual structures, dense connection structures, and dense skip connections. The authors adopted a multiclass Dice loss function to deal with class imbalance and successfully prevented overfitting using data augmentation. The preliminary segmentation results subsequently served as the a priori knowledge for a continuous maximum flow algorithm for fine segmentation of target edges. Experiments revealed that the mean Dice similarity coefficients of the proposed algorithm in whole tumor, tumor core, and enhancing tumor segmentation were 0.9072, 0.8578, and 0.7837, respectively. The proposed algorithm presents higher accuracy and better stability in comparison with some of the more advanced segmentation algorithms for brain tumor images.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document