The puzzle of intrafamilial child sexual abuse: A meta-analysis comparing intrafamilial and extrafamilial offenders with child victims

2015 ◽  
Vol 39 ◽  
pp. 42-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael C. Seto ◽  
Kelly M. Babchishin ◽  
Lesleigh E. Pullman ◽  
Ian V. McPhail
2016 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 231-243 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Gekoski ◽  
Julia C. Davidson ◽  
Miranda A.H. Horvath

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to report on the findings from a study commissioned by the Office of the Children’s Commissioner (OCC) in England, concerning intrafamilial child sexual abuse (IFCSA)/incest. Specifically, it aims to explore what is known about the prevalence, nature, and impact of IFCSA and where the gaps in knowledge lie. Design/methodology/approach A rapid evidence assessment (REA) was used, the function of which is to: search the literature as comprehensively as possible within given time constraints; collate descriptive outlines of the available evidence on a topic and critically appraise it; sift out studies of poor quality; and provide an overview of the evidence. Over 57,000 documents were scanned, and 296 ultimately systematically analysed. Findings It was found that: there is wide variation in prevalence rates between studies; girls are more likely to be victims than boys; the onset of abuse is typically school age; abuse in minority groups is under-reported; sibling abuse may be more common than that by fathers; female perpetrated abuse may be under-reported; families where abuse occurs are often dysfunctional; and IFCSA has significant adverse effects on victims. Research limitations/implications A REA is not a full systematic review, differing in the scope and depth of the searches and depending almost exclusively on electronic databases, not accompanied by searching journals by hand. Practical implications This work found numerous gaps in current knowledge about IFCSA, which the authors recommend be addressed by further research, including: the scale and nature of IFCSA in disabled victims, research on BME children’s experiences; the prevalence of abuse by stepfathers as compared to biological fathers; the experiences of male victims; the experiences of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgendered child victims; the short-term impact of IFCSA based on child victims’ experiences; and more widely, further research on the prevalence of abuse in clinical populations and the relationship between that and prevalence in wider society. In addition to such questions, the OCC inquiry will also investigate issues surrounding child protection and criminal justice responses to (IF)CSA and how these might be improved. The evidence base for this section of the inquiry is reported in Gekoski et al. (2016). Originality/value The findings of this research provide the evidence base for a new two-year inquiry into the subject of IFCSA by the OCC.


Author(s):  
Asha Bajpai

Child sexual abuse and exploitation covers the sexual maltreatment of both children and young people. Part A deals with child sexual abuse (CSA) in India, its magnitude, and child sexual abuse in institutions. It deals with the national legal regime relating to CSA including the constitutional provisions, Juvenile Justice Act, 2015 and Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO). Law reform relating to some provisions in POCSO, child marriage laws, Right to Education Act and, and child victims and witnesses is recommended. Part B deals with commercial sexual exploitation and trafficking of minor children in the context of organized exploitation for commercial gain. The Indian laws dealing with commercial sexual exploitation and pornography are included. Important judgements and international instruments dealing with child sexual abuse and exploitation and the important role played by NGOs and government in dealing with cases of CSA and exploitation are included.


Author(s):  
Tayler M. Jones ◽  
Bette L. Bottoms ◽  
Kajal Sachdev ◽  
Jonathan Aniciete ◽  
Karis Gorak

2013 ◽  
Vol 37 (9) ◽  
pp. 613-622 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kai Ji ◽  
David Finkelhor ◽  
Michael Dunne

2009 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 328-338 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noemí Pereda ◽  
Georgina Guilera ◽  
Maria Forns ◽  
Juana Gómez-Benito

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document