Experience with the script concordance test to develop clinical reasoning skills in pharmacy students

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 1031-1041
Author(s):  
Kylee A. Funk ◽  
Claire Kolar ◽  
Sarah K. Schweiss ◽  
Jeffrey M. Tingen ◽  
Kristin K. Janke
Author(s):  
Jordan D. Tayce ◽  
Ashley B. Saunders

The development of clinical reasoning skills is a high priority during clinical service, but an unpredictable case load and limited time for formal instruction makes it challenging for faculty to foster and assess students’ individual clinical reasoning skills. We developed an assessment for learning activity that helps students build their clinical reasoning skills based on a modified version of the script concordance test (SCT). To modify the standard SCT, we simplified it by limiting students to a 3-point Likert scale instead of a 5-point scale and added a free-text box for students to provide justification for their answer. Students completed the modified SCT during clinical rounds to prompt a group discussion with the instructor. Student feedback was positive, and the instructor gained valuable insight into the students’ thought process. A modified SCT can be adopted as part of a multimodal approach to teaching on the clinic floor. The purpose of this article is to describe our modifications to the standard SCT and findings from implementation in a clinical rounds setting as a method of formative assessment for learning and developing clinical reasoning skills.


2016 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 86-90 ◽  
Author(s):  
François Kazour ◽  
Sami Richa ◽  
Marouan Zoghbi ◽  
Wissam El-Hage ◽  
Fady G. Haddad

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Enjy Abouzeid ◽  
Moataz Sallam

Abstract Introduction: Although clinical competence is multi-dimensional and should be acquired by each medical student, but most students learn clinical reasoning skills informally in clinical rotations. Accordingly, A prospective quasi-experimental study was conducted aiming to evaluate the merging of Script Concordance Test (SCT) and Team Based Learning (TBL) as a teaching/learning approach in clinical setting for medical students. Methodology: The study ran in three phases. Phase 1 (preparatory phase) involved students’ preparation and preparation of SCT. Phase 2 (implementation phase) included application of individual and team SCT (iSCT and tSCT respectively). Phase 3 (evaluation phase) compared score results and obtained students’ feedback.Results: Significant differences existed when comparing individual students’ response or students’ teams’ responses with experts scores. However, the use of the SCT/TBL approach had improved the clinical reasoning skills of the students in some vignettes and helped the lower achievers through the tSCT. The students found the approach appropriate for teaching or formatively assessing clinical reasoning. It helped them to discuss, correct their mistakes and improve their problem solving and reasoning skills. Conclusion: team-based learning improved students’ responses, especially the lower achievers, to script concordance test. SCT/TBL approach can be used to teach clinical reasoning for undergraduate students.


2010 ◽  
Vol 58 (11) ◽  
pp. 2178-2184 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge G. Ruiz ◽  
Renuka Tunuguntla ◽  
Bernard Charlin ◽  
Joseph G. Ouslander ◽  
Stephen N. Symes ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 35 (11) ◽  
pp. 1394-1401
Author(s):  
Rabia S. Atayee ◽  
Kashelle Lockman ◽  
Cara Brock ◽  
Daniel T. Abazia ◽  
Tracy L. Brooks ◽  
...  

Introduction: As the role of the pharmacist on the transdisciplinary palliative care team grows, the need for adequate instruction on palliative care and clinical reasoning skills in schools of pharmacy grows accordingly. Methods: This study evaluates second- and third-year pharmacy students from 6 accredited schools of pharmacy that participated in surveys before and after the delivery of a didactic palliative care elective. The survey collected student demographics, perceptions of the importance of and student skill level in palliative care topics. The script concordance test (SCT) was used to assess clinical decision-making skills on patient cases. Student scores on the SCT were compared to those of a reference panel of experts. Results: A total of 89 students completed the pre-/postsurveys and were included in data analysis. There was no statistically significant difference in student perceived importance of palliative care skills before and after the elective. Students from all 6 institutions showed significant increase in confidence in their palliative care skills at the end of the course. There was also a significant improvement across all institutions in clinical reasoning skills in most of the SCT questions used to assess these skills. Conclusions: Students choosing an elective in palliative care likely do so because they already have an understanding of the importance of these topics in their future practice settings. Delivery of a palliative care elective in the pharmacy curriculum significantly increases both student confidence in their palliative care skills and their clinical reasoning skills in these areas.


2011 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 472-477 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aloysius J. Humbert ◽  
Mary T. Johnson ◽  
Edward Miech ◽  
Fred Friedberg ◽  
Janice A. Grackin ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document