scholarly journals Rank influences human sex differences in dyadic cooperation

2014 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
pp. R190-R191 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joyce F. Benenson ◽  
Henry Markovits ◽  
Richard Wrangham
2009 ◽  
Vol 32 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 279-279 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eli J. Finkel ◽  
Erica B. Slotter

AbstractAccording to I3 Theory, individuals enact aggressive behaviors when (a) instigating triggers are severe, (b) impelling forces are strong, and/or (c) inhibiting forces are weak. Archer's analysis of human sex differences in aggression could be bolstered by a careful analysis of male-female discrepancies in reactivity (or exposure) to instigating triggers, proneness toward impelling forces, and/or proneness toward inhibiting forces.


Addiction ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 105 (4) ◽  
pp. 727-731 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea R. Vansickel ◽  
William W. Stoops ◽  
Craig R. Rush

2009 ◽  
Vol 32 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 292-311 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Archer

AbstractMy response is organized into three sections. The first revisits the theme of the target article, the explanatory power of sexual selection versus social role theory. The second considers the range and scope of sexual selection, and its application to human sex differences. Two topics are examined in more detail: (1) the paternity uncertainty theory of partner violence; (2) evolution of inter-group aggression. Section 4 covers ultimate and proximal explanations and their integration within an ethological approach. I consider the development of sex differences in aggression, and their causal mechanisms, within this framework.


1998 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 444-447 ◽  
Author(s):  
David C. Geary

Sexual selection traditionally involves male-male competition and female choice, but in some species, including humans, sexual selection can also involve female-female competition and male choice. The degree to which one aspect of sexual selection or another is manifest in human populations will be influenced by a host of social and ecological variables, including the operational sex ratio. These variables are discussed in connection with the relative contribution of sexual selection and the division of labor to the evolution of human sex differences.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document