Motor control: Neural correlates of optimal feedback control theory

2021 ◽  
Vol 31 (7) ◽  
pp. R356-R358
Author(s):  
Mackenzie W. Mathis ◽  
Steffen Schneider
Keyword(s):  
Motor Control ◽  
Feedback Control ◽  
Control Theory ◽  
Neural Correlates ◽  
Optimal Feedback Control ◽  
Optimal Feedback ◽  
Feedback Control Theory

Tips on Stochastic Optimal Feedback Control and Bayesian Spatiotemporal Models: Applications to Robotics

2014 ◽  
Vol 137 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jongeun Choi ◽  
Dejan Milutinović
Keyword(s):  
Sensor Networks ◽  
Feedback Control ◽  
Control Theory ◽  
Mobile Sensor Networks ◽  
Optimal Feedback Control ◽  
Mobile Sensor ◽  
Optimal Feedback ◽  
Spatiotemporal Models ◽  
Feedback Control Theory

This tutorial paper presents the expositions of stochastic optimal feedback control theory and Bayesian spatiotemporal models in the context of robotics applications. The presented material is self-contained so that readers can grasp the most important concepts and acquire knowledge needed to jump-start their research. To facilitate this, we provide a series of educational examples from robotics and mobile sensor networks.

Implications of Optimal Feedback Control Theory for Sport Coaching and Motor Learning: A Systematic Review

Motor Control ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-24
Author(s):  
Steven van Andel ◽  
Robin Pieper ◽  
Inge Werner ◽  
Felix Wachholz ◽  
Maurice Mohr ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Feedback Control ◽  
Motor Learning ◽  
Control Theory ◽  
Skill Acquisition ◽  
Best Practice ◽  
Optimal Feedback Control ◽  
Optimal Feedback ◽  
Different Types ◽  
Novel Theory ◽  
Feedback Control Theory

Best practice in skill acquisition has been informed by motor control theories. The main aim of this study is to screen existing literature on a relatively novel theory, Optimal Feedback Control Theory (OFCT), and to assess how OFCT concepts can be applied in sports and motor learning research. Based on 51 included studies with on average a high methodological quality, we found that different types of training seem to appeal to different control processes within OFCT. The minimum intervention principle (founded in OFCT) was used in many of the reviewed studies, and further investigation might lead to further improvements in sport skill acquisition. However, considering the homogenous nature of the tasks included in the reviewed studies, these ideas and their generalizability should be tested in future studies.

scholarly journals Task-dependent vestibular feedback responses in reaching

2017 ◽  
Vol 118 (1) ◽  
pp. 84-92 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johannes Keyser ◽  
W. Pieter Medendorp ◽  
Luc P. J. Selen
Keyword(s):  
Feedback Control ◽  
Control Theory ◽  
Vestibular Stimulation ◽  
Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation ◽  
The Body ◽  
Optimal Feedback Control ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Optimal Feedback ◽  
Feedback Control Theory ◽  
Feedback Responses

When reaching for an earth-fixed object during self-rotation, the motor system should appropriately integrate vestibular signals and sensory predictions to compensate for the intervening motion and its induced inertial forces. While it is well established that this integration occurs rapidly, it is unknown whether vestibular feedback is specifically processed dependent on the behavioral goal. Here, we studied whether vestibular signals evoke fixed responses with the aim to preserve the hand trajectory in space or are processed more flexibly, correcting trajectories only in task-relevant spatial dimensions. We used galvanic vestibular stimulation to perturb reaching movements toward a narrow or a wide target. Results show that the same vestibular stimulation led to smaller trajectory corrections to the wide than the narrow target. We interpret this reduced compensation as a task-dependent modulation of vestibular feedback responses, tuned to minimally intervene with the task-irrelevant dimension of the reach. These task-dependent vestibular feedback corrections are in accordance with a central prediction of optimal feedback control theory and mirror the sophistication seen in feedback responses to mechanical and visual perturbations of the upper limb. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Correcting limb movements for external perturbations is a hallmark of flexible sensorimotor behavior. While visual and mechanical perturbations are corrected in a task-dependent manner, it is unclear whether a vestibular perturbation, naturally arising when the body moves, is selectively processed in reach control. We show, using galvanic vestibular stimulation, that reach corrections to vestibular perturbations are task dependent, consistent with a prediction of optimal feedback control theory.

A Proposed Postural Control Theory Synthesizing Optimal Feedback Control Theory, Postural Motor Learning, and Cerebellar Supervision Learning

2020 ◽  
Vol 127 (6) ◽  
pp. 1118-1133
Author(s):  
Nathan Morelli ◽  
Matthew Hoch
Keyword(s):  
Feedback Control ◽  
Motor Learning ◽  
Control Theory ◽  
Postural Control ◽  
Motor Development ◽  
Internal Models ◽  
Optimal Feedback Control ◽  
Optimal Feedback ◽  
Task Goal ◽  
Feedback Control Theory

Multiple theories regarding motor learning and postural control development aim to explain how the central nervous system (CNS) acquires, adjusts, and learns postural behaviors. However, few theories of postural motor development and learning propose possible neurophysiologic correlates to support their assumptions. Evidence from behavioral and computational models support the cerebellum’s role in supervising motor learning through the production of forward internal models, corrected by sensory prediction errors. Optimal Feedback Control Theory (OFCT) states that the CNS learns new behaviors by minimizing the cost of multi-joint movements that attain a task goal. By synthesizing principles of the OFCT, postural sway characteristics, and cerebellar anatomy and its internal models, we propose an integrated learning model in which cerebellar supervision of postural control is governed by movement cost functions.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document