HEMA release and degree of conversion from a resin-modified glass ionomer cement after various delays of light activation

2016 ◽  
Vol 32 (5) ◽  
pp. 640-645 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisabeth Dursun ◽  
Jean-François Nguyen ◽  
Mie-Leng Tang ◽  
Jean-Pierre Attal ◽  
Michael Sadoun
Keyword(s):  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
Degree Of Conversion ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Light Activation ◽  
Resin Modified Glass Ionomer ◽  
Ionomer Cement

scholarly journals Structural and long-term mechanical properties from a resin-modified glass ionomer cement after various delays of light-activation

2018 ◽  
Vol 37 (6) ◽  
pp. 874-879 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marianne LAGARDE ◽  
Philippe FRANCOIS ◽  
Stéphane LE GOFF ◽  
Jean-Pierre ATTAL ◽  
Elisabeth DURSUN
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Properties ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Light Activation ◽  
Resin Modified Glass Ionomer ◽  
Ionomer Cement

scholarly journals Degree of Conversion of Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement Containing Hydroxyapatite Nanoparticles

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Behnoosh Jalalian ◽  
Parisa Golkar ◽  
Alireza Paktinat ◽  
Elham Ahmadi ◽  
Seyed Ali Panahande ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
Physical And Mechanical Properties ◽  
Degree Of Conversion ◽  
Pairwise Comparisons ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Weight Percentage ◽  
Resin Modified Glass Ionomer ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Ionomer Cement

Objectives: Hydroxyapatite (HA) nanoparticles are used to improve the physical and mechanical properties of glass ionomers (GIs). This study aimed to assess the effect of addition of different weight percentages of nano-HA on degree of conversion (DC) of Fuji II LC GI cement using a spectrometer. Materials and Methods: In this in vitro experimental study, 30 samples were fabricated of Fuji II LC (improved) GI cement in six groups (n=5) containing 0%, 1%, 2%, 5%, 7% and 10wt% nano-HA. The obtained paste in each group was subjected to Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) before curing to assess the monomer to polymer DC percentage. The paste was then light-cured and underwent FTIR again. One-way ANOVA was applied to compare the DC percentage of different groups. Pairwise comparisons were performed using the Tukey’s test. Results: The DC was 57.88±0.57% in 0%, 60.04±0.63% in 1%, 66.92±0.54% in 2%, 65.5±0.71% in 5%, 51.49±0.24% in 7% and 50.09±0.32% in 10% nano-HA group. The difference in DC among the groups was statistically significant (P<0.0001). The highest DC was noted in 2% nano-HA and the lowest DC was found in 10% nano-HA group. Pairwise comparisons revealed significant differences between the groups in DC (P<0.0001). Conclusion: Increasing the weight percentage of nano-HA to 2% increased the DC but increasing the nano-HA weight percentage over 5% decreased the DC of resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC). The highest DC was noted in 5w% and 2w% nano-HA groups. Thus, 5w% and 2w% nano-HA can be used to improve the DC of RMGIC

Microleakage of class II restoration with zirconia inlay: An in vitro study

2019 ◽  
pp. 61-67
Author(s):  
Xuan Anh Ngoc Ho ◽  
Anh Chi Phan ◽  
Toai Nguyen
Keyword(s):  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Resin Cement ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Resin Modified Glass Ionomer ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Self Etch ◽  
Ionomer Cement ◽  
Group 1 ◽  
Composite Restoration

Background: Class II restoration with zirconia inlay is concerned by numerous studies about the luting coupling between zirconia inlay and teeth. The present study was performed to evaluate the microleakage of Class II zirconia inlayusing two different luting agents and compare to direct restoration using bulk fill composite. Aims: To evaluate the microleakage of Class II restorations using three different techniques. Materials and methods: The study was performed in laboratory with three groups. Each of thirty extracted human teeth was prepared a class II cavity with the same dimensions, then these teeth were randomly divided into 3 groups restored by 3 different approaches. Group 1: zirconia inlay cemented with self-etch resin cement (Multilink N); Group 2: zirconia inlay cemented with resin-modified glass ionomer cement (Fuji Plus); Group 3: direct composite restoration using bulk fill composite(Tetric N-Ceram Bulk Fill). All restorations were subjected to thermal cycling (100 cycles 50C – 55 0C), then immersed to 2% methylene blue solution for 24 hours. The microleakage determined by the extent of dye penetration along the gingival wall was assessed using two methods: quantitative and semi-quantitative method. Results: Among three types of restorations, group 1 demonstrated the significantly lower rate of leakage compared to the others, while group 2 and 3 showed no significant difference. Conclusion: Zirconia inlay restoration cemented with self-etch resin cement has least microleakage degree when compare to class II zirconia inlay restoration cemented with resin-modified glass ionomer cement and direct composite restoration using bulk fill composite. Key words: inlay, zirconia ceramic, class II restoration, microleakage.

scholarly journals To Evaluate Shear Bond Strength of Resin Composite to Theracal Lc, Biodentine, and Resin–Modified Glass Ionomer Cement and Mode of Fracture: An In Vitro Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (02) ◽  
pp. 49-54
Author(s):  
Salil Mehra ◽  
Ashu K. Gupta ◽  
Bhanu Pratap Singh ◽  
Mandeep Kaur ◽  
Ashwath Kumar
Keyword(s):  
Statistical Analysis ◽  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
Bonding Agent ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Universal Adhesive ◽  
Resin Modified Glass Ionomer ◽  
Ionomer Cement

Abstract Introduction The aim of the current study was to evaluate shear bond strength of resin composite bonded to Theracal LC, Biodentine, and resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) using universal adhesive and mode of fracture. Materials and Methods A total of 50 caries-free maxillary and mandibular molars extracted were taken; occlusal cavities were prepared, mounted in acrylic blocks, and divided into five groups based on the liner used. Group 1: Biodentine liner placed into the cavity and bonding agent and resin composite applied after 12 minutes. Group 2: Biodentine liner placed into the cavity and bonding agent and resin composite applied after 14 days. Group 3: RMGIC liner placed into the cavity and bonding agent and resin composite applied immediately. Group 4: RMGIC liner placed into the cavity and bonding agent and resin composite applied after 7 days. Group 5: Theracal LC liner placed into the cavity and bonding agent and resin composite applied immediately. Each sample was bonded to resin composite using universal adhesive. Shear bond strength analysis was performed at a cross-head speed of 0.1 mm/min. Statistical Analysis  Statistical analysis was performed with one-way analysis of variance and posthoc Bonferroni test using SPSS version 22.0. Results and Conclusion Biodentine liner when bonded immediately to resin composite showed minimum shear bond strength. RMGIC when bonded to resin composite after 7 days showed maximum shear bond strength. Mode of fracture was predominantly cohesive in groups having Biodentine and Theracal LC as liner.

Short-term evaluation of the pulpo-dentin complex response to a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement and a bonding agent applied in deep cavities

2003 ◽  
Vol 19 (8) ◽  
pp. 739-746 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos Alberto de Souza Costa ◽  
Elisa Maria Aparecida Giro ◽  
Alexandre Batista Lopes do Nascimento ◽  
Hilcia Mezzalira Teixeira ◽  
Josimeri Hebling
Keyword(s):  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
Bonding Agent ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Complex Response ◽  
Resin Modified Glass Ionomer ◽  
Short Term Evaluation ◽  
Term Evaluation ◽  
Deep Cavities ◽  
Ionomer Cement

scholarly journals Bond strength of orthodontic light-cured resin-modified glass ionomer cement

2010 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 180-184 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Y. Cheng ◽  
C. H. Chen ◽  
C. L. Li ◽  
H. H. Tsai ◽  
T. H. Chou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Resin Modified Glass Ionomer ◽  
Ionomer Cement
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document