laser conditioning
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

136
(FIVE YEARS 16)

H-INDEX

14
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ting Li ◽  
Yuanan Zhao ◽  
Yafei Lian ◽  
Xiangyu Zhu ◽  
Xinlin Lv ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Elahe Soltanmohamadi Borujeni ◽  
Javad Chalipa ◽  
Ardavan Etemadi ◽  
Maryam Nasiri ◽  
Mohammad Javad Kharrazifard ◽  
...  

Objectives: The aim of the present study was to compare shear bond strength (SBS), adhesive remnant index and enamel cracks in bonding and rebonding of brackets to enamel, conditioned with erbium-doped yttrium aluminium garnet (Er:YAG) laser and conventional acid-etching. Materials and Methods: Fifty-two bovine lower incisors were randomly divided into four groups consisting of group 1 (acid-conditioning in both bondings), group 2 (acid-conditioning in first and laser-conditioning in second bonding), group 3 (laser-conditioning in first- and acid-conditioning in second bonding), and group 4 (laser-conditioning in both bondings). After bracket placement, the samples were thermocycled and tested for SBS in both bonding procedures. Adhesive remnant index scores and enamel cracks were also determined. Tukey's test and one-way analysis of variance was used for statistical analysis (P<0.05). Results: Mean SBS in the first bonding was 23.59MPa in groups 1 and 2, and 6.9MPa in groups 3 and 4. (P<0.001). The acid-etched teeth had a significantly lower SBS in rebonding, regardless of the reconditioning method (P<0.001). The SBS of the teeth conditioned with Er:YAG laser in the first bonding did not show significant changes in rebonding, although mean SBS was higher compared to the first bonding (P=0.675). Bonding most often failed at the enamel-adhesive interface and enamel cracks were observed in a few teeth. Conclusion: The method of primary enamel preparation can affect SBS in rebonding. Based on our results, the mean SBS of Er:YAG-conditioned groups was clinically acceptable in bonding and rebonding, although it was lower compared to the acidetched samples.


2021 ◽  
Vol 483 ◽  
pp. 126639
Author(s):  
Jian Zhang ◽  
Feng Geng ◽  
Zhichao Liu ◽  
Tao Xu ◽  
Qinghua Zhang ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 100040
Author(s):  
Owen C. Ernst ◽  
David Uebel ◽  
Stefan Kayser ◽  
Felix Lange ◽  
Thomas Teubner ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 70 (7) ◽  
pp. 074208-074208
Author(s):  
Liu Zhi-Chao ◽  
◽  
Xu Qiao ◽  
Lei Xiang-Yang ◽  
Geng Feng ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
pp. 030157422095716
Author(s):  
Piradhiba R. ◽  
Shahul Hameed Faizee ◽  
N.R. Krishnaswamy

Aim: To evaluate the demineralization resistance and the shear bond strength of enamel surfaces after erbium, chromium: yttrium–scandium–gallium-garnet (Er,Cr:YSGG) laser etching (2 W/15 Hz, 2 W/25 Hz) and to compare them with conventional acid etching for orthodontic bonding. Materials and Methods: A total of 60 extracted human premolars with intact enamel surface were used for this study. Demineralization Resistance was estimated using ion-coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometer (ICP-AES). Shear bond strength was evaluated using Universal Testing Machine—Instron. Results: Statistically significant difference ( P < .001) was found in the concentration of dissolved calcium (Ca) and phosphorus (P), with the highest mean Ca and P in the acid-etched group, followed by 2 W/15 Hz laser-etched group and least with 2 W/25 Hz laser-etched group. Maximum bond strength was found in the acid-etched group (12.06 MPa), followed by the 2 W/25 Hz laser-etched group (9.01 MPa) and 2 W/15 Hz laser-etched group (8.39 MPa). The differences were statistically significant. Conclusions: Laser conditioning of enamel surface revealed significant demineralization resistance with a minimal dissolution of Ca and P ions in the demineralizing solution. Moreover, optimum bond strength was obtained similar to that of acid etching; hence, Er,Cr:YSGG laser conditioning of enamel surface is preferred over the conventional phosphoric acid etching for orthodontic bonding.


2020 ◽  
Vol 59 (17) ◽  
pp. 5240 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhichao Liu ◽  
Feng Geng ◽  
Xiangyang Lei ◽  
Yaguo Li ◽  
Jian Cheng ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 189 ◽  
pp. 108530 ◽  
Author(s):  
Norbert Ackerl ◽  
Maximilian Warhanek ◽  
Johannes Gysel ◽  
Konrad Wegener

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document